1. Studies of Impact Assessment in Turkey-EU Accession Negotiations Process

2. 1.Harmonisation with Copenhagen Economic Criteria 2. Economic and Social Harmonisation 3. Economic and Social Effects of Harmonisation to the Acquis Economic Dimension of Negotiation Process

3. Economic and Social Effects Of Harmonisation with the Acquis (Impact Analysis)

4. Economic and Social Effects of Harmonisation to the Acquis Negotiations Undertaking EU acquis in a short period of time Economic and Social effects of harmonisation Cost of harmonisation

5. Impact Analysis Economic and Social Impacts of Harmonisation to the Acquis Accurate calculationof economic and social impacts resulting from harmonisation Planning harmonisation by taking costs into consideration (national resources; financila Aids and others) Management of harmonisation within a strategy supporting the economic performance

6. Identification of problematic areas in harmonisation, Identification of economic and social impacts of harmonisation, Calculation of financial burden of harmonisation, Identification of institutional impacts of harmonisation, Enabling efficient use of resources during harmonisation process, Carrying out negotiation process with a strategic and integrated approach Continuing negotiations with strong communication and cooperation Preparation of related parties for the harmonisation process Why Impact Analysis during Negotiation Process?

7. Reduction of the costs resulting from harmonisation to minimum, Planning of harmonisation by prioritizing it, Preparation of Negotiation Status Documents, Identification of transition arrangements to be demanded, Formation of institutional structures that harmonisation requires, Informing private sector and public. Areas in which the results of Impact Analysis will be used

8. Transition Arrangements; which should be limited in number and time because of some sensitive sectors Facilities provided for candidate countries related to harmonisation to and implementation of EU acquis Restrictions introduced to the new member countries to make existing member countries adapt the new situation resulting from enlargement easily Transition Arrangements

9. Opening-Closing criteria, Experiences of other countries,  latest members to the EU  member countries Areas that may cause difficulty in harmonisation  Expert opinions  Screening results Identification of Areas in which Impact Analysis will be carried out during negotiation process

10. Chapter NameOpening CriteriaClosing Criteria Free Movement of Goods Right of Establishment and Freedom to Provide Services Free Movement of Capital Public Procurement Competition Policy Financial Services Agriculture and Rural Development Food Safety, Veterinary and Phytosanitary Taxation Social Policy and Employment Enterprie and Industrial Policy Environment Customs Union Chapters for which opening and closing criteria are identified

11. Transition Arrangements made by Countries in the last two Enlargements of EU

12. CountriesNumber of Acquis for which Transition Arrangement was made Czech Republic22 Estonia25 Greek Administration of S. Cyprus19 Latvia39 Lithuania33 Hungary27 Malta40 Poland50 Slovenia27 Slovakia25 Bulgaria23 Romania28

13. Works Carried out On the basis of chapters for which screening was completed in 2006 Transportation Policy Competition Policy Right of Establishment and Freedom to provide Services Free Movement of Capital Intellectual Property Rights It was decided to carry ot impact assessment study in a total of 8 areas in chapters above. Out of these 8 areas, in just “1” area, an impact analysis study could be carried out.

14. Problems faced during studies EU membership process, conjunctural changes, Lack of political, accordingly senior bureaucratic support, Insufficient information about the study to be carried out, insufficient administrative and technical capacity, Shortcomings in the in-house and interinstitutional common working culture, Lack of participation, Common standards with which impact analysis will be carried out were not identified in a clear and informing way, Lack of adequate and reliable statistics, Lack of financial resource to be used for procuring services which may be needed in studies from time to time

15. Current Status 2009 Programme:Annex to Council of Ministers Resolution no. 2008/14200 Measure No: 224 Impact analysis studies will be carried out within the framework of accession negotiations. “Impact Analysis Guidelines will be prepared for the impact analyses to be carried out with the aim of identifying the economic and social impacts resulting from the harmonisation in areas where it is possible to come across with difficulties during harmonisation to acquis, areas will be identified and studies will be started.”

16. Current Status 22 January 2009 Chapter coordinator sent a formal paper to the institutions about identifying subjects/areas where it seemed to be useful to work in cooperation with other institutions during impact assessment. About100 subjects/areas found useful to carry out impact assessment for were proposed by institutions. 16 February 2009 A paper signed by Mr. Egemen BAĞIŞ, Chief Negotiator.