1. 1 V.A. Khoze ( IPPP, Durham and PINP ) KHARYS (in collaboration with Lucian HArland-Lang and Misha RYSkin) Central Exclusive Processes at Hadron Colliders ( Selected Topics ) CEP =

2. 2 Introduction (why we are interested in collecting CEPs ?) Standard Candle CEP reactions. CEP as a way to study old and new heavy resonances Dimeson and Update on exclusive Higgs production Summary and Outlook.

3. 3

4. 4 PPS@CMS PPS Totem-CMS measurements, ongoing discussions in LHCb and Alice hopefully…

5. 5 CENTRAL EXCLUSIVE PRODUCTION PROCESSES (odderon searches )

6. 6 (a lot of attention, ( Asher’s talk) )

7. 7 (S. Ostapchenko) One step forward, two steps back (V.I. Lenin)

8. 8 LHCb, CMS, (Totem-CMS) (soon to come CMS, Totem-CMS, LHCb, RHIC) ( D0, Totem-CMS,….AFP/PPS). (CDF) (so far all available CEP data in a good agreement with Durham)

9. 9 New Durham Studies Account for the b-dependence of the survival factors    (known unknowns) Improvements of models for soft diffraction : removing tensions with Totem data on and, agreement with the LHC results on low mass SD, (KMR, arXiv:1306.2149) agreement with the Tevatron/LHC data on CEP processes subprogram to SuperCHIC to calculate S 2 -KHARYS -13 (N)NLO-effects in the hard ME. (Mike’s talk) (Asher’s talk)

10. 10 New Dime MC (Harland-Lang, Khoze, Ryskin- 2013)

11. 11 New SuperCHIC MC

12. 12 CEP as a way to study old and new heavy resonances. Heavy Quarkonia Zoo of charmonium –like XYZ states

13. 13 (A. Alekseev-1958-positronium) (R.Pasechnik et al, Phys.Lett.B680:62-71,2009; HKRS, Eur.Phys.J.C65:433-448,2010 ) KMR-01 The effects of non-zero (especially for 2 + ). …and especially without proton detectors! (Krakow group )

14. 14 First ‘exclusive’ events now being seen at LHCb. Results suggestive of a sizeable contribution. 1 : 0.6 : 0.22 From CDF dipion/KK CEP : (Mike’s talk)

15. 15

16. 16 First CDF limits -2013 KMRS-2004 (Mike’s talk)

17. 17 Zoo of charmonium –like XYZ states

18. 18

19. 19

20. 20 Good Luck to LHCb

21. 21 and light (LHCb,CMS, Totem+CMS- news) (new LHC results)

22. 22

23. 23

24. 24 (M.Benayoun,V.Chernyak,-1990) 40 diagrams (4 basic) 

25. 25

26. 26 is this easy to understand ? currently popular (among the more formal community) MHV- technique

27. 27

28. 28

29. 29 (CDF, TOTEM-CMS –prospects )

30. 30

31. 31 THEORY UNCERTAINTIES Known Unknowns Unknown Unknowns N(N)LO- radiative effects (K-factors etc..) ‘…possible inadequancy of PT theory in  s …’ R.Barbieri et al-1980 ‘ ‘Right’ choice of gluon densities, in particular at so low scales as in the case ( potentiality of a factor of ~3 rise for the H-case ). Complete model for calculation of absorptive corrections. Complete theoretical (+MC) treatment of the proton dissociation effects in the RG events. Gluons at so low scales, surprises are not excluded at all. Non- pQCD effects in the meson characteristics. Currently no complete description of heavy quarkonium characteristics. ‘ Two gluon width does not tell the whole story.’

32. 32 H Main Goal: Update on Exclusive Higgs Production

33. 33 The main advantages of CEP Higgs production  Prospects for high accuracy (~1%) mass measurement (irrespectively of the decay mode).   Quantum number filter/analyser.  ( 0++ dominance ; C,P- even) H ->bb opens up ( Hbb Yukawa coupl. ) (gg) CED  bb in LO ; NLO,NNLO, b- mass effects – controllable. For some scenarios CEP may become a discovery channel   A handle on the overlap backgrounds- Fast Timing Detectors ( 10 ps timing or better ).  New leverage –proton momentum correlations ( probes of QCD dynamics, CP- violation effects… ) H BSM PRIOR TO THE LHC START-UP A= σ(φ < π)−σ(φ > π) σ(φ < π) +σ(φ > π ) ~n 0 ·(~p 1 ⊥ × 2 ⊥ ) ∼ sin φ A= σ(φ < π)−σ(φ > π) σ(φ < π) +σ(φ > π) currently ATLAS FP-420 (STFC cutting rule ) CMS-PPS, Totem ATLAS-AFP Triple product correlation: Integrated counting asymmetry (~10%) (very important feature)

34. 34 SM

35. 35 F i n d a C E P r e s o n a n c e a n d y o u h a v e c o n f i r m e d i t s q u a n t u m n u m b e r s !

36. Summary 1)Allowed MSSM phase space is very limited. LHC analyses show that the discovered Higgs is more and more SM like. Event yield for the exclusive SM Higgs is low but can be perhaps increased by tuning the selection procedure (we know the mass of Higgs, gluon-b misidentification improved). 2) Whether Higgs is SM or MSSM, the low-mass exclusive Higgs needs stations at 420 m. M. Taševský, AS CR Prague EDS 9-15.9.2013 Saariselkä, Finland MSSM Higgs Summary (Marek Taševský ) arXiv:1310.7772 [hep-ph ]

37. 37 Jury is still out

38. 38 Jury is still out ‘ Diffractive Higgs’ and new physics CEP (AFP, HPS) -jury is still out.

39. 39 We are looking forward to new exciting adventures in Exclusiveland

40. 40

41. 41

42. 42 

43. 43 Signal-to-Background Ratio (a brief reminder)  The largest signal, but large background and (most) difficult trigger (other channels –too low rate). Major theor. uncertainties cancel in the ratio, in particular survival factors, PDFs,.. Experimental efficiencies (trigger, b-tagging..) cancel. Dominant non-PU backgrounds: SM Higgs, 125 GeV   Main characteristics: 2007 (HKRTSW ) values Mass window ~4 GeV. g-b misID ~ 1.3% cone size ~0.5. S/B  1 Could be improved by a factor of 2 or so. (420+420)

44. DIME MC Novel probe of the models of soft interaction

45. 45

46. 46 g g

47. 47 Towards Full Acceptance Detector at the LHC (bj- 1992) IS THERE A WAY OUT ? Yes, an addition of Forward Shower Counters around beam pipes- low PU runs first results of combined CMS+ TOTEM measurements with the FSCs on (showers from particles with | | = 7-9) ( plans for LHCb and Alice) ( uninstrumented regions at LHCb and Alice)

48. 48 Published in JINST-2009 (Installed in 2011 at the CMS)

49. 49

50. 50

51. 51 Dipion CEP- coming soon

52. 52