1. Report from Amsterdam Massimo Sgaravatto INFN Padova

2. Amsterdam events Global Grid Forum (GGF) 1 DataGrid workshop

3. Global Grid Forum Focuses on the promotion and development of Grid technologies and applications via the development and documentation of "best practices," implementation guidelines, and standards Global GF efforts are also aimed at the development of a broadly based Integrated Grid Architecture that can serve to guide the research, development, and deployment activities of the emerging Grid communities www.globalgridforum.org

4. Global Grid Forum History GF BOF (Orlando) GF1 (San Jose — NASA Ames) GF2 (Chicago — iCAIR) eGrid and GF BOFs (Portland) GF3 GF3 (San Diego — SDSC) eGrid1(Posnan — PSNC) GF4GF4 (Redmond — Microsoft) eGrid2 (Munich — at Europar) GF5GF5 (Boston — Sun) Global GF BOF (Dallas) 19992000 Asia-Pacific GF Planning (Yokohama)

5. Global Grid Forum 2001 GGF1 (Amsterdam) March 4-7, 2001 w/ DataGrid “Kickoff” (March 7-9) Hosts: Amsterdam Science and Technology Center (SARA, Univ. Amsterdam, NIKHEF) 325 participants 192 organizations 28 countries GGF2 (Washington, DC) July 15-18, 2001 GGF3 (Rome) October 7-10, 2001 W/ DataGrid workshop (October 2-5) Frascati (Rome) 2001

6. Global GF Working Groups Account Management Applications and Testbeds Grid Information Services Remote Data Access Security Advanced Collaborative Environments Grid Protocol Architecture Advanced Programming Models Grid Computing Environments Grid Performance Scheduling User services JINI

7. How to Be Involved Electronic Participation Each working group uses email distribution lists for discussions Contributing to Grid Working Drafts Volunteer to help write a planned paper Submit an abstract/outline to propose a paper Architectures / Models API, Protocol, or other specification Survey or Current Practice Description Lead a Group Volunteer to start a working group or a sub-group within an existing working group

8. Scheduling & Resource Management WG Charter: generate best practice scheduling and resource management documents and API specifications to enable interoperability Co-chairs: Jenny Schops, Bill Nitzberg, Uwe Schwiegelshohn Web site: http://www.cs.nwu.edu/~jms/sched-wghttp://www.cs.nwu.edu/~jms/sched-wg Mailing list: sched-wg@gridforum.orgsched-wg@gridforum.org General meetings at Grid forum events and teleconferences

9. Scheduling WG @ GGF 1 3 documents discussed 10 actions for superscheduling Goal: list the basic steps and capabilities involved in resource reservation, acquisition and use Basically done Advanced reservation API Just an API because not yet advanced for a protocol Basically done Attributes for communication about scheduling instances Goal: define a set of attributes that a higher level scheduler can ask of a lower level scheduler In progress

10. Scheduling WG @ GGF 1 Suggested new documents Advance reservation protocol Allow advance reservation between systems Scheduling dictionary List of tokens and definitions to coordinate with the dictionary group (common glossary of important terms across the Grid forum) Already started (terms only, no definitions) (www.sdsc.edu/~mthomas/GF/terms/sched-terms.cgi)www.sdsc.edu/~mthomas/GF/terms/sched-terms.cgi Document to move this effort forward

11. Distributed Accounting WG Purpose Develop a prototype Grid accounting architecture such as is required for resource economies Define interactions with other Grid components and existing systems Create a specification that can be used to build and evaluate prototype systems Co-chairs: Tom Hacker, William Thigpen Web site: http://www.nas.nasa.gov/~thigpen/accounts-wghttp://www.nas.nasa.gov/~thigpen/accounts-wg Mailing list: accounts-wg@gridforum.orgaccounts-wg@gridforum.org Working drafts we may be interested in: Distributed accounting on the Grid An economy Grid architecture for service-oriented grid computing

12. GGF and WP 1 Should we/how do we contribute to the GGF effort ? Dictionary ? Accounting ? … ?

13. DataGrid ATF Progress Report Joint Parallel meetings WP 1-5 (Middleware) WP 6-7 (Testbed) WP 8-10 (Applications)

14. ATF Progress Report Documents (http://gridatf.web.cern.ch/grid- atf/documents.html) DataGrid Architecture version 1 Month 9 release We have to provide reactions Implementation plan for M9 release by the next PTB (April 19)

15. WP 1 –5 Information Services Relational vs. LDAP Scope WP 3 is going to provide only APIs (for producers and consumers) and interfaces What will be there in M9 ? Current Globus GIS implementation (WP 3) WP 1: many shortcomings and open issues (performances, incomplete schema,…) in the current Globus GIS implementation, and therefore it is probably unsuitable Discussion with S. Tuecke (Globus team) Aware of problems We may use/test Globus alpha releases  Workshop (Convenior WP 3 ) April 28,29 @ Cern

16. WP 1 - 5 Job Partition/Checkpoint of jobs ? At GRID level but also inside fabric ?  Applications have to help us, otherwise it is difficult how to split/checkpoint jobs Job input/output Files ? Objects ? …? Is the input/output known at schedule time ? Scheduling policies ? Deadline? Best fit ?, …?  Applications should provide their view

17. WP 1 –5 Storage Model Boundaries between WP2, WP4, WP 5 Global vs. local filenames Who does the house keeping …  Workshop: Convenior WP 2 March 27, 2001 @ Cern ? Accounting Economic model (WP 1) ?  WP 1 to investigate and circulate thoughts

18. WP 6 –7 Testbed organization Permanent Group (partner representatives, technical committee, site contacts, testbed support) Release team (one team for each release validation phase) Working model WP test activity (WPx) WP release (WPx + testbed +appl.) Testbed release (WPs + testbed + appl.) Official testbed release (+ users) Waiting for test requests

19. WP 6 –7 Testbed 0 Grid basic services deployment, based on Globus toolkit Resources Mainly Linux machines (also Suns, SGI) LSF, Condor, PBS, BQS > 100 people > 40 sites Main issues Information Services Resource access (certification, security and policies management) Installation toolkit

20. GIS Topology EU GIIS o=datagrid0 INFN (Italy) dc=infn,dc=it,o=datagrid0 France dc=fr,o=datagrid0 LIP (Portugal) dc=lip,dc=pt,o=datagrid0... dc=in2p3,dc=fr,o=datagrid... (root server at Cern) –Support for GIS deployment in place (Top level server)

21. WP 6 –7 Globus installation toolkit 3 toolkits available (INFN, UK, FR)  Working group to converge on common tools and common environment (within 3 weeks) Security CA group (chaired by D. Kelsey) already in place Support for certificates signed by the various national CA’s Access policies for Testbed 0 Globus grid-mapfiles Only one account per certificate (no group accounts) Requests for accounts for Testbed 0 via WP managers to WP6 General security group (chaired by D. Kelsey) is going to set up Security Workshop (29, 30 March @ Cern, Convenior: D. Kelsey) Representatives from WP’s Security experts/officers/reps from Testbed sites Other interested people

22. WP 8 - 10 OS & Net services Bag of Services (GLOBUS) DataGRID middleware PPDG, GriPhyn, EuroGRID HEP VO common application layer Earth Obs.Biology ALICEATLASCMSLHCb Specific application layer WP9WP 10 WP8-9- 10 TWG

23. WP 8 – 10 User cases for testbed 0 & 1 Basically ready for WP 8 Available for WP 9 User cases for testbed 2 & 3 Draft in one month for WP 8 Common (WP8-10) user requirements First draft in one month First release at M6

24. WP 8 –10 Preliminary reactions to ATF Objects or files when interacting with the middleware ? Access to middleware services from applications via API (C++ API) RW databases Interactive jobs They will propose use cases Required job resources unknown at schedule time Middleware portability Linux and Solaris is not enough The code should be written to run on any machine with a reasonable cc/java MPI and Corba Worries about the use of Condor (open source)

25. Other issues (not tackled) Grid global queues or local queues Gateway functionality Sharing of WP1 and WP4 tasks on the gateway Language translation Translation of Grid credentials to local credentials WP4: Will other WPs only query for information of the current state or is there a need to query for future changes ? Central middleware repository Coding convention and tools …

26. Informal discussions WP 2 Agent-based query optimization WP 4 For month 9 they basically agree to consider queues as resources Resource monitoring info We are consumer, they are producer We have to specify the attributes needed for M 9 release, and they will tell us if they can implement the corresponding information providers … depends on what exactly WP 3 plans to deliver concerning information and monitoring service

27. Condor In the first year we are allowed to use the Condor stuff Then we can rely only on open source software Probably possible for the Condor matchmaking library More complicated for Condor-G Possibility to have the source code

28. Condor: what’s new New Condor grid-manager and old Globus job manager (basically ready) Fixes for existing shortcomings (scalability in the submitting machine, logging, …) Globus GRAM client APIs New Globus job manager (in testing phase) 2-phase submit protocol Support for reattaching to an existing job New Condor grid-manager (4-6 weeks) Able to exploits the new Globus job manager

29. Agenda DataGrid topical (IS, DM, Security) workshops at CERN (week of March 26) DataGrid technical visit to Globus at ANL April 5-7 Agent technology workshop in Trento (ITC/IRST) May 17 INET 2001 5-8 June in Stockholm EuroGlobus 16-22 June EU-US coordination in Rome on 23/6/2001 Next project conference at Oxford 2-5 of July GGF2 in Washington 15-18 of July HPDC 7-10 of August in the US

30. Agenda CHEP2001 in Beijing (Grid sessions) 3-7 of September CERN school of Computing (Grid session) 16-29 September in Santander, Spain 6th Globus retreat and iDG-1 17-21 of September in Chicago DataGrid+GGF3 in Frascati+Rome 2-5 + 7-10 of October IST2001 in Brussels end of October-early November (DataGrid booth, presentations and demos?) SC’2001 10-16 November (DataGrid participation?)