1. Well-Being at Work Partnership ASSET Pulse Survey 2013 Initial Results Summary Gordon Tinline & Matt Smeed

2. Response Rate Pulse questionnaire launched on 15 th March Open for 6 weeks with a deadline of 26 th April Overall response rate 2171/4485 = 48.4% Response Breakdown by BDU DistrictHeadcountResponsesResponse Rate Calderdale36919953.9% Wakefield91346951.4% Kirklees61729147.2% Support Services74631642.4% Forensic Services42416839.6% Barnsley169659234.9%

3. Response Rate Response rates within SWYPFT: 2009: 49.0% (smaller Trust in partnership with BDCT) 2011: 49.6% 2013: 48.4% The typical response from larger NHS Trusts (larger than 4,000 employees) is 34% Typical main drivers of lower response rates: ‘Nothing ever happens’ Confidentiality at risk Clear communications Paper surveys hard to distribute and collect Survey fatigue

4. The ASSET Model of Well-Being

5. ASSET: ‘Full’ vs. ‘Pulse’ ScalesItems in Full ASSETItems in Pulse ASSET 6 Essentials3710 Physical Health64 Psychological Health115 Positive Psych Well-Being73 Sense of Purpose43 Engagement55 Perceived commitment from Trust 21 Commitment towards Trust 21 TOTAL7432

6. 2013 Results Compared to General Working Population (n=2075)

7. 6 Essentials (compared to general working population) All online respondents (n=2075) Note: the higher the score the greater the extent to which the area is considered a stressor; black bars represent 2011 results

8. Enablers and Barriers Raw Score Trends More Troubled

9. Your Health (compared to general working population) All respondents (n=2075) Note: the higher the score the greater the extent to which the area is considered a stressor; black bars represent 2011 results

10. Your Health Raw Score Trends Poorer Health

11. Psychological Well-Being (compared to general working population) All respondents (n=2075) Note: the higher the score the more positive the area; black bars represent 2011 results

12. Psychological Well-Being Raw Score Trends Positive Psychological Well-Being Sense of Purpose Note: A higher score is more positive

13. Engagement & Related Scales (compared to general working population) All respondents (n=2075) Note: the higher the score the more positive the area; black bars represent 2011 results

14. Engagement & Related Scales Raw Score Trends More Engaged/Committed

15. Snapshot Results The following slides show the ASSET results for groups at a glance There are two ways to read the results: – From left to right: see the results for a specific group across all ASSET measures – From top to bottom: see how each ASSET measure differs between the groups Use the key below to see how each group scored: All results are in comparison to the General Working Population. The number of respondents for each group is shown in brackets. Minimum group size = 8 Positive finding in relation to the general working population, e.g Sten 1-3 Enablers and Barriers Finding that is typical of the general working population, e.g. Sten 4-6 for Enablers and Barriers Area for Improvement in relation to the general working population, e.g. Sten 7 for Enablers and Barriers Risk in relation to the general working population, e.g. Sten 8-10 for Enablers and Barriers

16. Results Snapshot: BDU Positive finding in relation to the general working population, e.g Sten 1-3 Enablers and Barriers Finding that is typical of the general working population, e.g. Sten 4-6 for Enablers and Barriers Area for Improvement in relation to the general working population, e.g. Sten 7 for Enablers and Barriers Risk in relation to the general working population, e.g. Sten 8-10 for Enablers and Barriers BDU Resources & Communication Control Balanced workload Job Security and Change Work Relationships Job Conditions Positive Psychological Well- Being Sense of Purpose Engagement Perceived Commitment from Organisation Commitment towards the Organisation Kirklees (307) Barnsley (666) Corporate Services (223) Calderdale (208) Forensic Services (161) Wakefield (417)

17. Workplace Bullying 200920112013 Bullied at work23.4%19.8%23.1% Bullied in last 6 months40.1%31.9%36.9% Reported bullying34.7%39.1%39.9% Bullying resolved39.3%42.3%34.5%

18. Productivity & Presenteeism Average productivity: 82.3% 57% have come to work whilst ill at least once in the last 3 months 7% have worked more than 10 days whilst ill in the last 3 months Average productivity on the days: 64.9%

19. Well-Being Support Well-Being initiative Aware of initiative? Involved in initiative? Occupational health and well-being services 91.2%28.8% Well-being at work intranet pages 56.4%9.4% Staff retreat 71.9%3.3% Mental well-being and resilience policy 28.1%2.8% Staff counselling 84.6%13.8% As an employee of the Trust, who do you feel is primarily responsible for your well-being? You: 89% The Trust: 11%

20. Analysis: Next Steps Add paper data to analysis Further detailed hotspot analysis – Demographic trends – Division comparisons Build driver analyses Qualitative analysis – Bullying actions – Additional comments – Well-Being activities Access to results via ASSET software