Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCalvin Richards Modified over 9 years ago
1
RTAX-S Qualification and Reliability Data September 7-9, 2005 2005 MAPLD International Conference Minal Sawant Ravi Pragasam Solomon Wolday Ken O’Neill
2
Sawant, Wolday, Pragasam, O’NeillRTAX-S Qualification and Reliability Data MAPLD 2005 - # 1032 2 Outline Design Overview MIL-STD-883B Enhanced Antifuse Qualification (EAQ) Sample Size and Test Sequence Results MIL-STD-883B Enhanced Antifuse Qualification (EAQ) Enhanced Lot Acceptance (ELA) Plan Results Terminology: EAQ = ELA (both processes use the same design) Group C = High Temperature Operating Life (HTOL) = Dynamic Programmed Burn In (DPBI)
3
Sawant, Wolday, Pragasam, O’NeillRTAX-S Qualification and Reliability Data MAPLD 2005 - # 1032 3 Design Overview MIL-STD-883B Uses the QBI (Qualification Burn In) design Goal: Device Feature Maximum Utilization of logic cells Test all IO standards Test all macro offering (Carry chain, buffys etc) Test RAM feature Test for propagation delay Note: QBI = QCMON EAQ Uses the EAQ design Goal: Antifuse Reliability Tests all possible antifuse type Based on NASA style design Test for delay perceptibility
4
Sawant, Wolday, Pragasam, O’NeillRTAX-S Qualification and Reliability Data MAPLD 2005 - # 1032 4 Top Level QBI Design EAQ Design
5
Sawant, Wolday, Pragasam, O’NeillRTAX-S Qualification and Reliability Data MAPLD 2005 - # 1032 5 Delay Paths QBI includes one small delay chain EAQ includes 8 delay chains 22 Stages: ~ 36 ns
6
Sawant, Wolday, Pragasam, O’NeillRTAX-S Qualification and Reliability Data MAPLD 2005 - # 1032 6 Design Summary QBI I/O’s are configured with all the different combinations of I/O standards, slew and pull-up resistor (I/O standards LVTTL, PCI, and PCIX, LVPECL, and Vref are used) EAQ (RTAX1000S-CG624)
7
Sawant, Wolday, Pragasam, O’NeillRTAX-S Qualification and Reliability Data MAPLD 2005 - # 1032 7 Antifuse Utilization
8
Sawant, Wolday, Pragasam, O’NeillRTAX-S Qualification and Reliability Data MAPLD 2005 - # 1032 8 Sample Size QBI : 129 equivalent RTAX2000S-CQ352B devices used at 125°C Additional 78 devices of RTAX1000S-CQ352B used for LTOL (Low Temperature Operating Life) experiment at -55°C EAQ : 300 devices of RTAX1000S-CG624 used
9
Sawant, Wolday, Pragasam, O’NeillRTAX-S Qualification and Reliability Data MAPLD 2005 - # 1032 9 Test Sequence QBI : HTOL QBI : LTOL EAQ : AXS1 EAQ : ASX2
10
Sawant, Wolday, Pragasam, O’NeillRTAX-S Qualification and Reliability Data MAPLD 2005 - # 1032 10 QBI Summary QBI For RTAX2000S (87 units) = 84 + 3 spares For RTAX1000S (98 units) = 90 + 8 spares 7 failures were observed during the HTOL and LTOL tests
11
Sawant, Wolday, Pragasam, O’NeillRTAX-S Qualification and Reliability Data MAPLD 2005 - # 1032 11 QBI FA Investigation & Conclusions All the 7 failures* observed from the (QBI) devices indicated identical failure signature due to equipment induced ESD Physical Failure analysis indicated damage to the ESD circuit Duplication of failure mode with MM testing indicated identical failure signature ESD zap is due to the charge buildup on the CQ352 socket lid This charge does not exist on the CG624 package Thus no failures observed in the EAQ experiment No additional failures due to ESD have been observed since the use of ESD friendly and staticide treated socket lids De-processing of a second failed device showed the same failure signature RTAXS Passed ESD at 2000 V HBM RTAXS Passed ESD at 250 V MM *Failure analysis report available upon request
12
Sawant, Wolday, Pragasam, O’NeillRTAX-S Qualification and Reliability Data MAPLD 2005 - # 1032 12 EAQ Summary EAQ 9 failures were observed during the HTOL and LTOL tests 8 Failures had identical failure signature 1* (HTOL after 1000 hrs) unit has a different failure signature Failure Analysis under progress Antifuse has been eliminated as a potential cause No Antifuse failures observed EAQ experiment will be continued for an extra 1000 hours of HTOL on a sample size of 120 units from above lot Results expected by Mid October 2005
13
Sawant, Wolday, Pragasam, O’NeillRTAX-S Qualification and Reliability Data MAPLD 2005 - # 1032 13 EAQ FA Investigation Conclusions Analysis and testing showed that all 8 failures* were on the same output pin “AE16” All 8 devices came from burn-in board locations D1 and D2 Failure analysis indicated that the damage was on the output buffer pull-down transistor Damage was due to contention problem on the burn-in boards The -1V on the output, with over 300 mA current, exceeded the absolute worst case condition for extended periods No additional failures have been observed since the contention was eliminated AXS1 completed 250 hrs of LTOL and AXS2 completed 1000 hrs of HTOL with no failures De-processing of a second failed device showed the same failure signature * Failure analysis report available upon request
14
Sawant, Wolday, Pragasam, O’NeillRTAX-S Qualification and Reliability Data MAPLD 2005 - # 1032 14 ELAPlan Uses the same high perceptive design as EAQ ELA is the EAQ design used in the production flow of RTAX-S devices A sample of units will be tested per each wafer lot before shipment This will qualify the lot for shipment Units will be programmed to the ELA design Units will be sent for 168 hours of Burn in at 125°C 100% yield is required to qualify lot for shipment
15
Sawant, Wolday, Pragasam, O’NeillRTAX-S Qualification and Reliability Data MAPLD 2005 - # 1032 15 ELAResults Results to date – No Antifuse failures Shipping RTAX-S to Space Flight Applications today
16
Sawant, Wolday, Pragasam, O’NeillRTAX-S Qualification and Reliability Data MAPLD 2005 - # 1032 16 DSCC SMD Application Status SMD# Pre-assigned SMD# for RTAX-S are 5962-04219 for RTAX250S 5962-04220 for RTAX1000S 5962-04221 for RTAX2000S SMD Application SMDs in draft Derived from Actel datasheet Qualification Package in preparation Qual results, FA reports, with TRB approval minutes Qual lots attribute sheets, copies of assembly/test/burn-in travelers Silicon technology summary with XSEM showing planarized process Support documents Submission to DSCC being planned for the end of October 2005 Certification expected by the end of 2005
17
Sawant, Wolday, Pragasam, O’NeillRTAX-S Qualification and Reliability Data MAPLD 2005 - # 1032 17 Conclusion NO ANTIFUSE FAILURES More than 650,000 hours of test data available now MIL-STD-883B Qualification completed successfully EAQ experiment completed successfully 150 units with 1000 hours of HTOL and 250 hours of LTOL 150 units with 250 hours of LTOL and 1000 hours of HTOL Shipping RTAX-S to Space Flight Applications today Both “B” & “E” flows shipping
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.