1. European e-JUSTICE and e-Conveyancing Ingmar Vali ingmar.vali@just.ee

2. Topics e-JUSTICE Challenges e-Conveyancing Solutions DEMO: Cross-border prototype

3. Why European e-JUSTICE? Basic ideas access to existing information easy and quick exchange of data justice applications Ivo Thiemrodt 2009 European Commission

4. e- JUSTICE portal www.ejustice.eu

5. 3. State of play 2009 Information Citizen Practitioner Judiciary Going to court Family matters Legal aid Costs of proceedings Financial claims Mediation Crime victims Law Legal professions Justice Forum Judicial Atlas Taking of evidence Videoconferencing Business Business registers Financial claims Land registers Law Insolvency registers Cooperation in civil matters Judicial training Insolvency registers EBR EULIS EPO Video conferencing Identity management CR disclosure Applications Ivo Thiemrodt 2009 European Commission e-JUSTICE

6. e-JUSTICE functionality/purpose Authentic information Central portal Security –Authentication –Authorization (roles and rights) –Electronic signature –Cross-border proceedings –File and data transfer

7. Challange comparison E-JUSTICE Authentication Authorization Electronic signature Cross-border proceedings File and data transfer Language Semantics ….. e-Conveyancing Authentication Authorization Electronic signature Cross-border proceedings File and data transfer Language Data protection Technical differences ….

8. Solutions? IMI- Internal Market Information system. STORK- EU authentication. EULIS –European Land Information System. SPOCS- Simple Procedures Online for Cross-border Services. E-codex and other pilots (DIM, PEJA,….). ….

9. Cross border electronic filing concept for European payment order procedure EU e-justice

10. Cross-border prototype concept

11. Cross border digital signature Belgium ID-card Portugese ID-card Finnish ID-card Lithuanian Mobile-ID

12. Conclusions Is e-JUSTICE portal for e-conveyancing? –MAYBE- lets not invent a wheel! Build new portal for e-conveyancing? –Maybe! First thing first! –Requirements and functionality description –Prototyping, Piloting, Argumentations.

13. Conclusions

14. Prototype