Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Donna Douglas, School Psychologist FCPS Daniel St. Rose, School Social Worker FCPS Karen Lieberman, Alt. School Programs FCPS.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Donna Douglas, School Psychologist FCPS Daniel St. Rose, School Social Worker FCPS Karen Lieberman, Alt. School Programs FCPS."— Presentation transcript:

1 Donna Douglas, School Psychologist FCPS Daniel St. Rose, School Social Worker FCPS Karen Lieberman, Alt. School Programs FCPS

2  Provide a Brief Overview of Restorative Practices.  Provide a Brief Overview of Positive Behavior Support  Review how Restorative Practices fit into a PBS framework  Provide specific examples of how Restorative Practices can be used at each level of intervention in the PBS framework

3

4 Traditional – School rules violated – Justice focuses on establishing guilt – Accountability=Punishment – Action focuses on offender – Victim is often ignored – Rules and intent outweigh outcomes – No opportunities for remorse or amends Restorative – People and relationships violated – Justice identifies needs and obligations – Accountability=understand ing impact and repairing harm – Offender, victim, and school all have direct roles – Offender is responsible for behavior and repairing harm – Allows for amends and expression of remorse

5  Emphasizes harms and resulting obligations  Keeps the victims’ needs/interests central  Encourages offenders to understand and take responsibility for harm  Involves dialogue and the community  Promotes individual and societal healing and growth

6 Restorative Practices ARE - Victim centered and victim sensitive - A vehicle for victims to have a voice - An opportunity for taking responsibility for your actions - A vehicle for offenders to listen to those affected by their actions - An opportunity to learn how to start changing behavior Restorative Practices ARE NOT - Soft on offenders - A way for the offender to avoid consequences - Only for juveniles or less serious offenses - New processes - The opposite of or substitute for an existing system

7 Harm focused: How have individuals been harmed and what do they need? ◦ Identify, repair and prevent future harm. Engagement: Victim, offender, community, and school are engaged through a facilitated dialogue process. Responsibility/Obligations: Individuals accept responsibility for their actions.

8 Repair: Individuals agree to repair harm that has been done. Prevention: Individuals learn from their mistakes.

9

10 A student misbehaves in class and her teacher asks her to leave. The student is suspended from school and comes back. Nothing is resolved; nothing is restored. With restorative practices, the student is held accountable and given support to resolve the issue, repair the harm and make a plan to ensure that the misbehavior doesn’t happen again. Relationships are restored and community is built. Ted Wachtel, International Institute for Restorative Practices

11 http://www.iirp.org/westphilahigh/

12

13  Designed to support and reinforce positive academic and social behavior through comprehensive systems  Focuses on teaching children positive pro- social skills directly in real context  Supports positive relationships between students, teachers, staff and parents.  When used in a comprehensive manner, combines classroom, school, home and community efforts

14 Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT

15 Red Zone: intensive, individual interventions, assessment-based Yellow Zone: targeted group interventions, focus on “at risk” students Green Zone: universal practices, focus on “all students”, pro-active teaching and prevention

16  PBS gives schools the structure within which to teach and reinforce positive pro-social skills, and to consistently provide intervention designed to increase the demonstration of these skills.  RP give schools the opportunity to focus on repairing relationships rather than focusing on punitive responses.

17  RP is not an add-on program, nor is it solely a group of graded responses to wrongdoing.  Using RP within the PBS framework allows a school to focus on building, supporting, and repairing critical emotional and social skills in students, staff, and community.

18 Restorative Practices  Involves dialogue and the community  Promotes individual and societal healing and growth  Encourages offenders to understand and take responsibility for harm  Emphasizes harms and resulting obligations  Keeps the victims’ needs/interests central Positive Behavior Support  Supports and reinforces positive academic and social behavior through comprehensive systems  Focuses on teaching children positive pro- social skills directly in real context  Supports positive relationships between students, teachers, staff and parents.  When used in a comprehensive manner, combines classroom, school, home and community efforts

19

20 Circles - Circles are used throughout RP in a variety of forms and for numerous purposes. - At the Universal Practices level, circles typically focus on increasing community and social/emotional understanding. - Purposes might include community building, developing understanding, celebration, support, community problem solving, checking in and checking out, etc.

21 Problem Solving Circles - Focus is on taking responsibility - Can be on-going or time limited - Identify potential members using PBS data - Interview members to ensure understanding and willingness to participate - Topics or concerns to address might include: attendance issues, failing grades, non-compliance, girls groups, bullying, reintegration etc.

22 Conferencing - Conferencing is the most formal restorative process and can be used to supplement or supplant other traditional remedies such as suspension. - Involves all parties directly involved, their respective supporters and others in the community who have been affected.

23 Conferencing (con’t) - Seeks to identify and repair harm caused in a relationship and prevent recurrence. - Participation is voluntary and based on parties willingness and readiness. - Agreements are consensus-based.

24 1. Pre-conferencing – occurs separately with each party. 2. Identification and preparation of supporters and other involved parties. 3. Conference – may lead to agreement to take additional remedial actions. 4. Follow-up.

25 - Conferencing may be used for: -Interpersonal conflicts (student-student; student- staff; staff-staff) -Bullying/Harrassment -Fighting/Assault -Vandalism -Theft -Truancy -Drug/Alcohol Use - Etc.

26  What are the needs in your building?  To what level do your current practices reflect a restorative philosophy?  What would you like to see in your program?  How will your current practices need to change in order to reflect what you would like to see?  What might be the roadblocks to change?

27  What are your strategies for addressing these roadblocks?  Develop an Action Plan.  Schedule time to follow-up, review, and adjust.

28 Restorative Practices can enhance Positive Behavior Support by building a focus on respect and relationships into the system.


Download ppt "Donna Douglas, School Psychologist FCPS Daniel St. Rose, School Social Worker FCPS Karen Lieberman, Alt. School Programs FCPS."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google