Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

@CareOptionsAU #BeingHome2025 From 8 warring tribes to seamless service delivery Or why a co-operative model worked for us.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "@CareOptionsAU #BeingHome2025 From 8 warring tribes to seamless service delivery Or why a co-operative model worked for us."— Presentation transcript:

1 @CareOptionsAU #BeingHome2025 From 8 warring tribes to seamless service delivery Or why a co-operative model worked for us

2 @CareOptionsAU #BeingHome2025 Original Meals on Wheels areas in the Bega Valley

3 @CareOptionsAU #BeingHome2025 Some history Bega started a delivered meals service 1970 Bega funded Tathra’s start up 5 years later Candelo and Bemboka started 1979 Eden, Pambula, Merimbula and Bermagui all commenced service delivery by 1982 Candelo secured centre based day care funding 1991

4 @CareOptionsAU #BeingHome2025 Why the fragmentation? All areas were started by committed members of the community who saw a need and acted upon that need Each area had different meal provider arrangements – all hot meals Bega and Tathra - Bega Hospital meals Candelo and Bemboka – volunteers cooked meals in local halls Pambula and Merimbula – Pambula Hospital meals Eden and Bermagui – local clubs cooked meals

5 @CareOptionsAU #BeingHome2025 Why the warring tribes? Long term community perceptions Money Power What were the consequences? Inconsistent service delivery Volunteers overloaded Lack of resources to cope with change

6 @CareOptionsAU #BeingHome2025 So how did the amalgamation come about? HACC programme developed. Concerns about large number of small organisations to be funded Paid staff were funded to facilitate amalgamation Some areas willing to amalgamate due to fears of service collapse Some areas unwilling to amalgamate due to fears of being taken over by the enemy!

7 @CareOptionsAU #BeingHome2025 Why a Co-operative model? No-one could agree on who should be the lead agency. All areas wanted equal say in the structure Local politics – six areas initially Trading or non-trading co-operatives

8 @CareOptionsAU #BeingHome2025 How was the Co-operative structured? Governed by a Board of Directors Membership was restricted to MOW volunteers Members were equal Each area nominated a director and a sub-director to the Board. These were the only members Executive positions elected from the members

9 @CareOptionsAU #BeingHome2025 Central administration office in Bega Gained Charitable and DGR status Offered more service types Social support Respite Centre based day care Veterans Community Support Service How did the Co-operative operate?

10 @CareOptionsAU #BeingHome2025 Was it a success? More or less – some teething problems Each areas volunteers and delivery arrangements remained unchanged Administration (including the dreaded MDS) was responsibility of paid staff Other funding was granted In 2001 the last 2 areas joined the Co-operative

11 @CareOptionsAU #BeingHome2025 What are the lessons? Stick to your mission or be prepared to adapt it Don’t buy into the local politics – employ staff who don’t as well Have a workable constitution Ensure members are clear about the difference between governance and service delivery And the big one…

12 @CareOptionsAU #BeingHome2025 Which is…? Make sure the membership provisions can be reviewed Make sure the membership provisions are flexible Board originally had 12 positions and these were the only members. By 2001 there were 14 directors.

13 @CareOptionsAU #BeingHome2025 Why would that cause problems…? By 2003 some areas were not nominating directors due to Lack of interest in governance – they just wanted to deliver meals in their community Lack of understanding or engagement with the other service types Concerns about the liability conditions placed on directors Other interests and members were ageing

14 @CareOptionsAU #BeingHome2025 Which meant that … The Board grew smaller, but not necessarily more effective Increasing pressure was placed on the members who were more able to understand governance and the service types Changes to the membership structure became a priority Identified officially as a matter of urgency in 2007 IMF

15 @CareOptionsAU #BeingHome2025 What has happened since IMF? Used representative and co-opting provisions in rules to attract more skilled directors - temporary Now have Board of 6 - 2 more resigned last year Used HACC Transition funds to rewrite Co-operatives Rules to broaden membership New rules sent to NSW Fair Trading for approval. Then to be taken to extraordinary general meeting for approval Membership will be broadened to any and all of our volunteers – fee $2 Any BVMOW+ volunteer who contributes 5 hours p.a. can nominate or be nominated to be a Director

16 @CareOptionsAU #BeingHome2025 In hindsight The rigid membership provisions very quickly got in the way of good governance More work should have been put into the structure of the Co-operative and the consequences of the limited membership Lack of understanding lead to lack of direction for staff but luckily no disasters.

17 @CareOptionsAU #BeingHome2025 Now have income of <$900K (funding + fees) Still proudly volunteer based service delivery Meals funding now <40% of total funding Looking at a business arm to augment funding Board members have good understanding of our business, just need 2 more Community understands service is Shire wide Looking forward to the future So where are we now?

18 @CareOptionsAU #BeingHome2025 For more information about co- operatives NSW, Victoria, Western Australia and South Australia have their own Co-operatives Federation or equivalent Co-operatives Australia is the peak body and has good resources for establishing a co-operative. Most State governments have models rules that can be adopted Fiona Scott 02 6492 0972 manager@bvmowplus.org.au


Download ppt "@CareOptionsAU #BeingHome2025 From 8 warring tribes to seamless service delivery Or why a co-operative model worked for us."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google