1. TITLE Authors

2. Introduction

3. Review of Literature Identify the main themes of your review of literature using articles to identify who said what and what it means. Use about 1 slide per “idea”

4. Review of Literature For example Brasile (1990) Investigated classification in wheelchair basketball and found Class I’s differed from all other classes Hedrick (1997) investigated the difference between men and women on selected wheelchair basketball skills and found…..

5. Purpose Purpose statement “The purpose of the study was to ……”

6. Hypothesis State your hypothesis as a null hypothesis There is not significant (difference or relationship) between (identify the levels of your independent variable) as measured by (dependent variable)

7. NULL HYPOTHESIS There is no significant difference in the attitudes and perceptions of spectators attending male collegiate wheelchair basketball games and those attending male collegiate running basketball games, as measured by the Disability Sport Survey.

8. Method

9. Participants (Subjects) Identify your sample. – i.e. Participants were women attending the PVA Camp Wisconsin, March 2000 – i.e. Groups were randomly selected from Class I and Class II athletes attending the camp

10. Instrumentation State the nature of your dependent variable(s) Identify the psychometric properties of your instrument – i.e. Selected wheelchair basketball skill tests from the Brasile (1986) test of wheelchair basketball skills. – i.e reported reliability for the skill test was…Validity was ……

11. Procedure How did you collect your measures If appropriate identify testing protocols – i.e. The Wingate test – Or Subjects were tested as two separate groups in the order recommended by Brasile Other procedural safeguards

12. Statistical Analysis Restate null hypothesis(ses) Independent Variable(s) Dependent Variable(s)

13. Name IVName DV Group 1X1X1 Group 2X2X2 Statistical Analysis Cell Diagram

14. Statistical Analysis Identify your statistical procedure – E.g. One-way between groups ANOVA State your alpha level Identify post-hoc procedures (only if post- hoc is necessary) Data were analyzed using SPSS 16.0

15. Results

16. Demographic Variables

17. Performance Variables

18. Statistical Analysis F[4, 216] = 9.04, p <.001 (If appropriate post-hoc here) Where there is significance identify the means – i.e. Group 1 mean = – i.e. Group 2 mean = Therefore Group X scored significantly greater, or higher, or lower etc.

19. Discussion

20. Conclusion Identify the main elements of the results i.e. ANOVA revealed a a significant difference (p <. 001) between group x and group y on selected basketball skill tests i.e. An examination of the means indicated that Group X performed “more” than Group Y.

21. Discussion Relate your results to the main points from the introduction i.e. That Class 1’s performed less well than Class 2’s confirms (contradicts) the findings of Brasile (1987) i.e. This result supports the findings of Slock (1976)

22. Recommendations This area is still to be clarified It is recommended that this study be replicated Further studies should examine the skill differences between Class 2’s and Class 3’s Also the differences in male wheelchair basketball performance should be examined

23. References Burgdorf, R. (2002). The Americans with disabilities policy brief series: Righting the ADA. The National Council on Disabilities. Coakley (Ed.) (2004). Sport and society: Issues and controversies (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Evaggelinou, C., & Grekinis, D. (1998). A survey of spectators at the international Stoke Mandeville Wheelchair Games. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 15, 25-35. Malone, L., Lienert, C., & Yilla, A.B. (2002) Item analysis of the Disability Sport Survey. 6 th North American Federation of Adapted Physical Activity (NAFAPA) Symposium. Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.