Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byPoppy Mason Modified over 9 years ago
1
Delay and Disruption Tolerant Networks Mostafa Ammar College of Computing Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA In Collaboration: Ellen Zegura (GT), Brian Levine and Mark Corner (UMass) Funding: NSF, DARPA, Cisco
2
The “Traditional” Ad-Hoc Wireless Paradigm The Network is “Connected” There exists a (possibly multi-hop) path from any source to any destination The path exists for a long-enough period of time to allow meaningful communication If the path is disrupted it can be repaired in short order “Looks like the Internet” above the network layer
3
The Rise of Sparse Disconnected Networks
4
Sparse Wireless Networks Disconnected By Necessity By Design (e.g. for power considerations) Disruption-Tolerant Networks (DTNs) Mobile With enough mobility to allow for some connectivity over time Data paths may not exist at any one point in time but do exist over time
5
New Communication Paradigms Mobility used for connectivity New Forwarding Paradigm Store Carry for a while forward Special nodes: Transport entities that are not sources or destinations
6
Data Applications Nicely suitable for Delay tolerant applications Our work also considers the feasibility of flow-based applications
7
Delay and Disruption Tolerant Networks A large burst of recent activities Some commonality but also lots of different approaches A coherent picture is beginning to emerge
8
Epidemic Routing
11
message is delivered…
12
SWIM* (*Shared Wireless Infostation Model)
13
Vehicle-to-Vehicle Networks Source Destination
14
Vehicle-to-Vehicle Networks Source Destination
15
Vehicle-to-Vehicle Networks Source Destination
16
DakNet
17
Our Work The Message Ferrying Paradigm Throwboxes to enhance capacity Power Management in DTNs Vehicle-to-Vehicle Networks Prototyping and Testbed Efforts
18
Message Ferrying (MF) Exploit non-randomness in device movement to deliver data A set of nodes called ferries responsible for carrying data for all nodes in the network Store-carry-forward paradigm to accommodate disconnections Ferries act as a moving communication infrastructure for the network
19
Message Ferrying s
20
s
21
s
22
MF Variations Ferry mobility Task-oriented, e.g., bus movement Messaging-oriented, e.g., robot movement Regular node mobility Stationary Mobile: task-oriented or messaging-oriented Number of ferries and level of coordination Level of regular node coordination Ferry designation Switching roles as ferry or regular node
23
Questions Our Research Answers How to route the ferry How to manage multiple ferries How to insure fault tolerance
24
Throwboxes Basic idea: add new devices to enhance data transfer capacity between nodes Deploy throwboxes to relay data between mobile nodes Throwboxes are: small, inexpensive, possibly dispensable, battery-powered wireless devices Some processing and storage capability Easy to deploy and replenish
25
Example: DTN w/out Throwboxes
26
Example: DTN w/ Throwboxes
27
Our Work Considers Placement of Throwboxes Throwbox prototypes (UMass)
28
Throwboxes ProcessorIntel PXA255 400MHz Memory64MB SDRAM 32MB Flash Power consumption < 500mA Size3.5’’ x 2.5’’ Weight47g
29
V2V Networks Vehicle Relaying V3: Vehicle-to-Vehicle Video Streaming
30
A sample scenario Deadline
32
Prototyping Efforts DTNrg Spec-Compliant implementation Cisco Mobile Routers DieselNet (UMass)
33
Concluding Remarks Mobility-Assisted Data Delivery FINALLY! A realistic mobile wireless network paradigm Everything looks familiar but this is a truly different environment Techniques developed have wide applicability Fertile Ground for both networking problems and novel application paradigms
34
Concluding Remarks Mobility-Assisted Data Delivery FINALLY! A realistic mobile wireless network paradigm Everything looks familiar but this is a truly different environment Techniques developed have wide applicability Fertile Ground for both networking problems and novel application paradigms
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.