Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 20101 Flavour-specific asymmetry and LHCb Robert W. Lambert On behalf of the LHCb collaboration.

Published byChristiana Powers Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 20101 Flavour-specific asymmetry and LHCb Robert W. Lambert On behalf of the LHCb collaboration."— Presentation transcript:

1 R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 20101 Flavour-specific asymmetry and LHCb Robert W. Lambert On behalf of the LHCb collaboration

2 Introduction  D  exclusive asymmetryhep-ex 0904.3907hep-ex 0904.3907  D  Inclusive asymmetryhep-ex 1005.2757hep-ex 1005.2757  What can we do at LHCb? R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 20102

3 Literature  Reading material:  LHCb –CERN-LHCb-2007-054Public note from old Monte CarloCERN-LHCb-2007-054 –CERN-THESIS-2008-045Paul’s ThesisCERN-THESIS-2008-045 –CERN-THESIS-2009-001Rob’s ThesisCERN-THESIS-2009-001 –CERN-THESIS-2010-076Ken’s ThesisCERN-THESIS-2010-076  Theory –hep-ph 0406300 U. Nierstehep-ph 0406300 –hep-ph 0612167 [JHEP]A. Lenz, U. Nierstehep-ph 0612167[JHEP] –hep-ph 0605028 [PRL]Y. Grossman et al.hep-ph 0605028[PRL] –hep-ph 0604112 [PRL] Z. Ligeti et al.hep-ph 0604112[PRL]  Other measurements –hep-ex 0505017[PRD]Bellehep-ex 0505017[PRD] –hep-ex 0202041[PRL]Babarhep-ex 0202041[PRL] –hep-ex 0101006[PRL]Cleohep-ex 0101006[PRL] –Note 9015CDF inclusiveNote 9015 R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 20103

4 Outline 1.Theory.. from an experimentalist 2.Experimental Status 3.Complications at LHCb 4.Why LHCb? 5.Measurements at LHCb 6.Real data highlights 7.Outlook and Prospects 8.Conclusions R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 20104

5  Flavour-specific decays  Favoured/Allowed  Not allowed at tree  Through mixing  Flavour specific asymmetry, a fs, parameterises CPV in mixing R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 20105 Flavour-specific asym.

6 The whole shebang  Three different parameters fully constrain b-mixing  a fs is very small in the standard model R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 20106

7 Discovery Potential  a fs is sensitive to new physics (NP):  Sensitive to loop contributions  Sensitive to new CPV phases  If we allow a single NP phase in the mixing  R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 2010 ? 7

8 Discovery Potential  a fs is sensitive to new physics (NP):  Sensitive to loop contributions  Sensitive to new CPV phases  If we allow a single NP phase in the mixing  R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 2010 ? 8

9  a fs is sensitive to new physics (NP):  Sensitive to loop contributions  Sensitive to new CPV phases  If we allow a single NP phase in the mixing   Up to 200-times the SM... but... (4x10 -3 )< D  measurement Discovery Potential R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 2010 ? 9

10 R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201010 Experimental Status

11 B-factories  Babar, Belle, Cleo all use the di-muon sample  Know the initial state  (4S)  Time-integrated number-counting of di-muons  Possible muon detector asymmetry is important to measure R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201011 b b c  c b  hep-ph 0605028

12 Exclusive measurement  D  have also made an exclusive measurement  Search for the full decay chain in the data  Requires full reconstruction  Flavour-tagging provides extra information Lower and more easily understood backgrounds xExtra detector asymmetry xLower statistics R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201012 BsBs BsBs Ds+Ds+  hep-ex 0904.3907

13 CDF Inclusive  CDF use only the di-muon sample  Don’t know the initial state (pp)  Time-integrated number-counting  Possible muon detector asymmetry is important to measure R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201013 b b c  c b  Note 9015

14 New D  inclusive R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201014 b b c  c b   D  used primarily the di-muon sample  Don’t know the initial state (pp)  Time-integrated number-counting  Possible muon detector asymmetry is important to measure hep-ex 1005.2757

15 New D  inclusive  Key Systematics (it’s difficult to be inclusive!)  Kaons decaying in-flight  Punch-through of hadrons to muons  Key methods  Rely on real data, cross-check with well-tuned Monte Carlo  Use the inclusive single muon sample to get extra information  Reverse magnets to remove most detector asymmetry  Do many many cross-checks in different phase-space regions  Result, 3.2  ! R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201015 hep-ex 1005.2757

16 Summary  Before the New D  Inclusive Measurement  A lot of measurements  All consistent with SM +/- 1%  The New D  Inclusive Measurement  First evidence of departure from the SM  Statistics-limited, so may improve over the next year  A lot of theory interest, so, how will LHCb help? ... The situation is significantly more complicated... R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201016

17 R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201017 Complications

18 R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201018 The simple formula 10 -3 -> 10 -5

19 R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201019 The simple formula  Polluting asymmetries are much larger than a fs  Detector asymmetry  c ~(10 -2 )  Production asymmetry  p ~(10 -2 )  Background asymmetry  b ~(10 -3 ) 10 -2 10 -3 10 -3 -> 10 -5 Very Complicated

20 LHCb R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201020

21 Detector Asymmetry,  c  Matter detector  hadronic interactions are asymmetric  Magnet divides +/- charge, allowing +/- detector asymmetry  We need to reverse the magnet regularly R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201021 MC Asymmetry in Muons LeftRight +ve-ve After 4Tm Magnet Kaon PDG cross-section PDG 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0.11101001000 momentum in lab frame P lab / GeVc hadronic cross-section / mb. K-, p K+, p Kaon interaction cross-section K - p K + p

22 LHC R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201022  An amazing machine  Unfortunately also not CP symmetric

23 Production Asymmetry,  p  LHC is a proton-proton collider: not CP-symmetric  LHCb is at high rapidity where production asymm. are largest  There is never a simple control channel to measure  p R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201023  p (B 0 and B 0 ) Valence Quark Scattering P YTHIA Explicitly asymmetric at LHC

24 R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201024 Why LHCb?

25  LHCb is a dedicated, precision, b-physics experiment  More statistics: we’re in the forward region, and at LHC R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201025

26 Being Timely  Proper Time: LHCb Velo precise down to 35 fs! R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201026

27 Being Precise  Particle ID: separation handled by dedicated subdetectors  Two RICHes, Calorimetry and Muon system R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201027 RICH 1 (Vertical) RICH 2 (Horizontal) MAGNET TT T1-T3

28 Being Exclusive  Our forte: exclusive, reconstructed, b-decays  In particular, time-dependent measurements R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201028 Monte-Carlo! ~100k D s in 5 fb -1 ~100k D s in 0.05 fb -1

29 R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201029 Measurements

30  Inclusive  Exclusive  Subtraction method combine and R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201030

31 Inclusive at LHCb  Channel  Measured by D  (see earlier)  Complications  Physics!  Production asymmetry: N(b)≠N(anti-b) [in acceptance]  P YTHIA predicts  p (b) =  Mitigating factors  None, difficult to interpret this measurement R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201031 ~10 8 per fb -1

32 Inclusive at LHCb  Channel  Measured by D  (see earlier)  Complications  Physics!  Production asymmetry: N(b)≠N(anti-b) [in acceptance]  P YTHIA predicts  p (b) =  Mitigating factors  None, difficult to interpret this measurement R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201032 ~10 8 per fb -1

33 Hadronic at LHCb  Channel R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201033 ~10 5 per fb -1 CERN-THESIS-2008-045 CERN-LHCb-2007-017 Monte-Carlo!

34 Hadronic at LHCb  Channel  Measures  Complications  Must fix either  c or  p in the fit – (  b can be fit beforehand)  Mitigating factors  Detector asymmetry small ~10 -4  Fit a fs and  p. – With excellent proper time resolution (35 fs) R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201034 CERN-THESIS-2008-045 CERN-LHCb-2007-054 ~10 5 per fb -1

35 Hadronic at LHCb  Channel  Measures  Complications  Must fix either  c or  p in the fit – (  b can be fit beforehand)  Mitigating factors  Detector asymmetry small ~10 -4  Fit a fs and  p. – With excellent proper time resolution (35 fs) R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201035 CERN-THESIS-2008-045 CERN-LHCb-2007-054 ~10 5 per fb -1

36 Semi-leptonic  Channel (q = s/d) R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201036 ~10 6 per fb -1 CERN-LHCb-2007-054 Monte-Carlo!

37 Semi-leptonic  Channel (q = s/d)  Measures  Complications  Missing neutrino makes proper-time resolution worse (≥120 fs?)  Detector asymmetry large and difficult to measure  Mitigating factors  Lots of statistics, but this makes  c even more important R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201037 CERN-LHCb-2007-054 ~10 6 per fb -1

38 Semi-leptonic  Channel (q = s/d)  Measures  Complications  Missing neutrino makes proper-time resolution worse (≥120 fs?)  Detector asymmetry large and difficult to measure  Mitigating factors  Lots of statistics, but this makes  c even more important R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201038 CERN-LHCb-2007-054 ~10 6 per fb -1

39 The subtraction method  Take B s /B d with the same final states ( =KK  ) Background asymmetry: 2D fit in mass spectra Production asymmetry: fit with proper-time dependence Detector asymmetry: the same in each decay…  Do a simultaneous time-dependent fit  Measure the difference between B s and B d  Very comparible to the D  measurement, but orthogonal to it! R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201039

40 The subtraction method  Take B s /B d with the same final states ( =KK  ) Background asymmetry: 2D fit in mass spectra Production asymmetry: fit with proper-time dependence Detector asymmetry: the same in each decay…  Do a simultaneous time-dependent fit  Measure the difference between B s and B d  Very comparible to the D  measurement, but orthogonal to it! R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201040

41 R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201041 Real data highlights

42 R Lambert, CERN42CERN CPV, 18th June 2010 -- PV SV TV BsBs Ds+Ds+       EVT: 49700980 RUN: 70684 LHCb Preliminary mm Real Data B s ~800  b -1

43 R Lambert, CERN43CERN CPV, 18th June 2010 PV SV BdBd D+D+       TV -- EVT: 141526660 RUN: 70666 LHCb Preliminary mm Real Data B d ~800  b -1

44 All D (s) ->KK  R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201044 n.b. Selection with no requirement for a muon (need ~40 nb -1 ) ~2.6 nb -1

45 R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201045 Sensitivities and Outlook

46 Sensitivity estimates  Full MC used to tune toy MC  Massive toy MC studies done in:  CERN-LHCb-2007-054 CERN-LHCb-2007-054  CERN-THESIS-2008-045 CERN-THESIS-2008-045  CERN-THESIS-2009-001 CERN-THESIS-2009-001  Scaled to:  Latest Monte Carlo efficiencies   (bb) = 500  b R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201046 Stat. Error (500  b) 100 pb -1 1fb -1 a fs s (D s  ) 2.1 x10 -2 6.8 x10 -3  A fs (D q  ) 2.0 x10 -3 6.3 x10 -4 All MC predictions!! Real data will be worse

47 Current Results R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201047 fs

48 After 1fb -1 of LHCb R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201048 Assume A b central value and no NP in B d fs

49 c.f. J/   R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201049 hep-ph 0612167   Directly Measure sin  s   (  s ) = 0.05 c in 1 fb -1   Effectively Measures   (  ) = 0.5 c in 1 fb -1  But they constrain NP differently  Effective power enhanced  NB physical limit of a fs is at 4x10 -3 < current D  result! Current measurements (pre D0 paper) Red :  m s Yellow:  s Black:  s Blue: a fs

50 Combining D  R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201050

51 D  and CDF  -2  s =  s R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201051 FPCP 2010

52 D  and CDF  (add my own personal merging) R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201052 FPCP 2010

53 Conclusion  D  have made an astounding new measurement (3.2  !)  At LHCb the environment is more hostile, concentrate on: Low detector asymmetry, great proper time resolution Detector and production asymmetries fitted with the data R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201053 Stat. Error (500  b) 100 pb -1 1fb -1 a fs s (D s  ) 2.1 x10 -2 6.8 x10 -3  A fs (D q  ) 2.0 x10 -3 6.3 x10 -4 from All MC predictions!! Real data will be worse (a) (b)

54 End  Backups are often required R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201054

55 Cereal loops R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201055 Now in bitesize-chunks! Act now and get your first 10 5 decays free! New Physics in special boxes! A fs  and  m s in every box! Two exciting flavours!

56 Nomenclature  A decay to a given state which cannot be reached by the anti- flavour state (at tree level) = flavour-specific  CP-violating asymmetry in mixing, manifests directly in flavour-specific decays = A fs /a fs flavour-specific asymmetry  Since this is most readily observed in semi-leptonic decays it is also referred to as A sl  a final state of given flavour. its charge conjugate. R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201056

57 After 1fb -1 of LHCb R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201057  LHCb measurement cuts at right-angles  really depends what the value is, and if there is NP! current favoured value A b central value and no NP in Bd

58 Detector Asymmetry,  c  Magnet divides +/- charge, allowing +/- asymmetry  by reversing magnet in D0:  c reduced from 3% -> ~0.1% R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201058 Asymmetry from Long Muon Tracks Reconstructed in MC LeftRight -ve+ve LeftRight +ve-ve Before 4Tm MagnetAfter 4Tm Magnet

59 Detector Asymmetry,  c  Matter detector  hadronic interactions are asymmetric  Dominant systematic at order 1% R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201059 Kaon PDG cross-section PDG 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0.11101001000 momentum in lab frame P lab / GeVc hadronic cross-section / mb. K-, p K+, p Kaon interaction cross-section K - p K + p Resultant charge asymmetry (MC)

60 Systematics (1)  1.Detector asymmetry Expect second order, so < 10 -4 Know the magnitude in real data from the pi momentum spectra Detect any bias by binning in momentum Correct with MC: Assuming the magnet is reversed!! 2.Production asymmetry Separate using the time-dependence Detect large bias from this by binning in eta Measure production asymmetry, possible but very coarse 3.Background asymmetry Fit simultaneously, simply, in the B-mass spectrum R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201060

61 Systematics (2)  1.Detector asymmetry only second order, so < 10 -4 Know the magnitude in real data from the daughter momenta Detect any bias by binning in momentum Correct with MC: Assuming the magnet is reversed!! 2.Production asymmetry Separate using the time-dependence Detect large bias from this by binning in eta Measure in can help quantify any bias 3.Background asymmetry Suppressed by the effective B/S < 0.1, in the signal region Fit simultaneously, 2D fit, in the B-mass and D-mass spectra Cancel detector-related part also, only production remains Detect bias by binning in eta R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201061

62 The subtraction method  Take B s /B d with the same final states ( =KK  )  All production asymmetry is in x 2 /x 3, just throw it away  Measure the difference between B s and B d R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201062

63 Subtraction method  Channel (q = s/d)  Measures  Complications  Requires weak constraints on  and  m  Mitigating factors  Production asymmetry fit simultaneously  Detector asymmetry cancelled R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201063 CERN-THESIS-2009-001 CERN-LHCb-2007-054

64 R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 201064 Production Asymmetry  Tuned Pythia samples *=standard decays, †=Stable Bd+Bs  Asymmetries agree with generic bb events  p x1000 Min Bias (10M)*bb – inclusive (10M)* (20M) † Pions-(4.23 ± 0.16)-(2.16 ± 0.09)-(2.27 ± 0.07) Kaons-(17.0 ± 0.5)-(7.73 ± 0.26)-(8.2 ± 0.2) Muons--+(2.0 ± 1.2)+(1.0 ± 0.9) Ds---(1.6 ± 1.1) Bs---(1.9 ± 1.3)-(1.5 ± 0.8) Bd---(3.2 ± 0.7)-(3.2 ± 0.4)

Download ppt "R Lambert, CERNCERN CPV, 18th June 20101 Flavour-specific asymmetry and LHCb Robert W. Lambert On behalf of the LHCb collaboration."

Similar presentations

Studies of open heavy flavour production at LHCb Artur Ukleja (The Andrzej Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies, Warsaw) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration.

Studies of open heavy flavour production at LHCb Artur Ukleja (The Andrzej Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies, Warsaw) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration.
Charm results overview1 Charm...the issues Lifetime Rare decays Mixing Semileptonic sector Hadronic decays (Dalitz plot) Leptonic decays Multi-body channels.

Charm results overview1 Charm...the issues Lifetime Rare decays Mixing Semileptonic sector Hadronic decays (Dalitz plot) Leptonic decays Multi-body channels.
Determination of and related results from B A B AR Masahiro Morii, Harvard University on behalf of the B A B AR Collaboration |V cb | MESON 2004, Krakow,

Determination of and related results from B A B AR Masahiro Morii, Harvard University on behalf of the B A B AR Collaboration |V cb | MESON 2004, Krakow,
ICFP 2005, Taiwan Colin Gay, Yale University B Mixing and Lifetimes from CDF Colin Gay, Yale University for the CDF II Collaboration.

ICFP 2005, Taiwan Colin Gay, Yale University B Mixing and Lifetimes from CDF Colin Gay, Yale University for the CDF II Collaboration.
Radiative B Decays (an Experimental Overview) E.H. Thorndike University of Rochester CLEO Collaboration FPCP May 18, 2002.

Radiative B Decays (an Experimental Overview) E.H. Thorndike University of Rochester CLEO Collaboration FPCP May 18, 2002.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.

Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
DPF-2006 1 Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.

DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
Measurements of Radiative Penguin B Decays at BaBar Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara For the BaBar Collaboration 32 nd International.

Measurements of Radiative Penguin B Decays at BaBar Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara For the BaBar Collaboration 32 nd International.
Heavy Flavor Production at the Tevatron Jennifer Pursley The Johns Hopkins University on behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty 2006 - University.

Heavy Flavor Production at the Tevatron Jennifer Pursley The Johns Hopkins University on behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty University.
1 B Physics at CDF Junji Naganoma University of Tsukuba “New Developments of Flavor Physics“ Workshop Tennomaru, Aichi, Japan.

1 B Physics at CDF Junji Naganoma University of Tsukuba “New Developments of Flavor Physics“ Workshop Tennomaru, Aichi, Japan.
I. Shipsey Heavy Quark Physics ICHEP06 7/27/06 1 The Y(5S) at CLEO Introduction Bs Reconstruction at the Y(5S) CLEO PRL 96, 022002 (2006) B Reconstruction.

I. Shipsey Heavy Quark Physics ICHEP06 7/27/06 1 The Y(5S) at CLEO Introduction Bs Reconstruction at the Y(5S) CLEO PRL 96, (2006) B Reconstruction.
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota Determination of |V cb | Using Moments of Inclusive B Decay Spectra BEACH04 Conference June 28-July 3, 2004 Chicago,

Alex Smith – University of Minnesota Determination of |V cb | Using Moments of Inclusive B Decay Spectra BEACH04 Conference June 28-July 3, 2004 Chicago,
Y(5S): What has been learned and what can be learned Steven Blusk Syracuse University (on behalf of the CLEO and Belle Collaborations)  Introduction,

Y(5S): What has been learned and what can be learned Steven Blusk Syracuse University (on behalf of the CLEO and Belle Collaborations)  Introduction,
1. 2 July 2004 Liliana Teodorescu 2 Introduction  Introduction  Analysis method  B u and B d decays to mesonic final states (results and discussions)

1. 2 July 2004 Liliana Teodorescu 2 Introduction  Introduction  Analysis method  B u and B d decays to mesonic final states (results and discussions)
Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ B mixing at DØ WIN 2005 Delphi, Greece Chris Barnes, Imperial College.

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ B mixing at DØ WIN 2005 Delphi, Greece Chris Barnes, Imperial College.
Peter Fauland (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity for the B S - mixing phase  S at LHCb.

Peter Fauland (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity for the B S - mixing phase  S at LHCb.
The BaBarians are coming Neil Geddes Standard Model CP violation BaBar Sin2  The future.

The BaBarians are coming Neil Geddes Standard Model CP violation BaBar Sin2  The future.
Beauty 2006 R. Muresan – Charm 1 Charm LHCb Raluca Mureşan Oxford University On behalf of LHCb collaboration.

Beauty 2006 R. Muresan – Charm 1 Charm LHCb Raluca Mureşan Oxford University On behalf of LHCb collaboration.
Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.

Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.
B S Mixing at Tevatron Donatella Lucchesi University and INFN of Padova On behalf of the CDF&D0 Collaborations First Workshop on Theory, Phenomenology.

B S Mixing at Tevatron Donatella Lucchesi University and INFN of Padova On behalf of the CDF&D0 Collaborations First Workshop on Theory, Phenomenology.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google