1. David Kim Allergan Inc. SoCalBSI California State University, Los Angeles

2. Objective Develop a model to predict corneal permeability based on literature compounds

3. Introduction Ocular drug delivery mechanism (through cornea and/or conjunctiva) Focus of the project is the corneal route

4. Three major cell layers of the Cornea

5. Why predict corneal permeability? Allergan, Inc. develops drugs which are administered through the eye A drug is only effective if it can reach its target tissue Can save company time and money in determining if the drug can pass through the cornea before the drug is synthesized

6. Introduction Few models have been developed to predict corneal permeability Congeneric model (one class of compounds) Non-congeneric model (mutiple class of compounds) Develop non-congeneric model focused on drug-like compounds

7. Find optimal training and testing set percentage Final Model Statistical analysis Literature Compound names logPC and logD structure of compounds Run Partial Least Squares modeling Pick best model Remove descriptor with the lowest importance Rebuild model Filter descriptors (intuitively) Generate descriptor values

8. Partition Coefficient: Log D = log of the Distribution Coefficient (pH 7.65) Log PC = log of the Permeability Coefficient (cm/s) Yoshida, F., Topliss, J.G., J. Pharm. Sci. 85, 819-823 (1996)

10. Compounds in Literature Went through published literature Filtered compounds to look only for drug like compounds Came up with 30 compounds and their measured permeability Next step in our model building process is to produce descriptors for each of our compounds

11. Descriptors Molecular weight or volume Degree of ionization Aqueous solubility Hydrogen-bonding Log D Polar surface area (PSA) pKa Solvent accessible surface area

12. Schrödinger Software Named after Erwin Schrödinger –Nobel prize winner for the Schrödinger equation which deals with quantum mechanics Suite of various programs dealing with computational chemistry Two programs used: Maestro – calculate descriptor values Canvas – generate model

13. Maestro Program

14. Can generate 77 descriptors Can manually input descriptors (eg. log D) Filtered descriptors which do not deal with permeability (intuitively) to reduce noise Came up with 30 descriptors to use Export the 30 compounds and its 30 descriptors to Canvas

15. Canvas Program

16. Partial Least Squares (PLS) modeling Can specify what descriptors to use to build the model Can specify the compounds used for training and testing the model Model assessment: corresponding statistics of the model

17. Statistics Training Set Standard deviation (SD) – low Coefficient of determination (R 2 ) – high close to 1 Coefficient of determination, cross validation (R 2 -CV) – high close to 1 Stability – close to 1 F-statistic (overall significance of the model) – high P-value (probability that correlation happened by chance) – low <0.01

18. Statistics Testing Set Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) – low Q 2 – high close to 1 Pearson correlation coefficient (r-Pearson) – high close to 1 Important for the assessment of what percentage of the compounds we want to use for the training set Important for the assessment of our model as we start to remove unnecessary descriptors

19. Finding the ideal training set percentage Ran PLS modeling specifying various percentages to use for the training set 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80% Looked at the statistics of each of the models built Found that using 80% of the compounds for the training set was ideal 30 compounds found in literature 24 in training set and 6 in the testing set

20. bx coefficient After the PLS model is built, it gives the bx coefficient for each descriptor in order to predict permeability The bx coefficient is the weight that the model puts on the descriptor after the descriptor values have been scaled Example: log PC = 0.348(scaled MW) –0.221(scaled log D) -0.002(scaled log P)……

21. Removal of descriptors Started with 30 descriptors and built a model Identified the descriptor with the lowest bx coefficient and removed it Rebuilt model with 29 descriptors Repeat…. while keeping track of the statistics Want to keep track of statistics to know when to stop Example: log PC = 0.348(scaled MW) –0.221(scaled log D) -0.002(scaled log P)………….(30) log PC = 0.392(scaled MW) –0.183(scaled log D)……………………………….………….(29)

22. Test Statistics Training Statistics

23. Remaining 8 Descriptors CIQPlogS – conformation independent predicted aqueous solubility QPlogS - predicted aqueous solubility FOSA – hydrophobic component of the total solvent accessible surface area PISA -  (carbon and attached hydrogen) component of the total solvent accessible surface area

24. Remaining 8 Descriptors QPlogKp - predicted skin permeability QPlogBB – predicted blood/brain partition coefficient donorHB - Estimated number of hydrogen bonds that would be donated by the solute to water molecules in an aqueous solution log D – Distribution coefficient

25. Permeability Model Function log PC = -0.1371(scaledCIQPlogS ) - 0.1383(scaledFOSA) + 0.1792(scaledPISA) + 0.1558(scaledQPlogBB) + 0.2815(scaledQPlogKp) - 0.1451(scaledQPlogS) - 0.2242(scaleddonorHB) + 0.2646(scaledlogD) SD = 0.460791 R 2 = 0.814213 F = 46.0162 (p < 0.0000001)

26. Predicted vs Observed Permeability

27. Conclusion Successfully created a model to predict the corneal permeability of compounds Showed that the Schrödinger software generates significant descriptors to build a permeability model

28. Potential Future Work Apply the model to external training set to asses its predictability power Build a more refined model with more compounds Find other descriptors other than the ones generated by Maestro and use them in the model building

29. Acknowledgments Dr. Ping Du Dr. Chungping Yu Pushpa Chandrasekar Noeris Salem Allergan SoCalBSI