Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byClarence Bennett Modified over 9 years ago
1
Ammonia emissions from UK agriculture – the NARSES model TFEIP Workshop, Thessaloniki, Greece, 30-31 October 2006 Tom Misselbrook IGER, North Wyke, UK Imperial College
2
Introduction Inventory model for a major emission source - NARSES as an example Detailed partial emission factors (incl. process-based) Detailed activity data Spatial and temporal disaggregation Introduction of abatement measures Cost curve development Mapped output
3
NARSES National Ammonia Reduction Strategy Evaluation System Ammonia emissions from UK agriculture >80% total UK emission Replaces ‘old-style’ UK ammonia emissions inventory Nitrogen flow model, mass-conservative EF now expressed as % of available N rather than ‘fixed’ units
4
Ammonia sources 1. Nitrogen fertiliser applications NH 3 Emission = fn (fertiliser type, land use, temperature, rainfall, soil pH) Monthly time-step Fertiliser types associated with different potential emissions Activity data from British Survey of Fertiliser Practice EF
5
Ammonia sources 2. Nitrogen excretion by livestock NH 3 Total N (RAN) NH 3 grazing yards housing storage spreading measures
6
Emission factors Livestock group grazingyardshousing - slurry housing – straw-bed Slurry store lagoonFYM heap … Dairy cow6%75%30%25%5%50%35% Dairy heifer Beef cow Beef heifer Bull Cattle 1-2 yrs Calves Sows …. All expressed as % RAN in the emission pool
7
Activity data Data sources: June agricultural census (livestock numbers) Farm practice surveys Ad-hoc surveys Expert opinion
8
Technical measures For each potential abatement technique: Emission reduction efficiency Applicability Current implementation Cost e.g. shallow injection 70% 80%? 1% £2.40 per m3 slurry
9
NARSES Model : 8 Sectors, 269 Nodes, 349 Links, 162 Measures
10
Operates at 10 x 10 km grid Cost-curve optimisation
11
Model developments Increasingly link EF to environmental and management variables Include links with N 2 O emission and NO 3 leaching models Include ‘front-end’ linking diet with N excretion
12
Projections NARSES a robust model for making projections: Defines key parameters which need to be surveyed/estimated Accounts for bulk changes in livestock numbers Also accounts for management changes – policy, environment or market forces
13
Projections – Dairy cows UK milk production to stay the same Cow numbers declining, increasing milk yield per cow Increasing N excretion per cow
14
Projections – Pigs and poultry Implementation of IPPC [No change in livestock numbers]
15
Summary To make robust projections: Sufficient level of detail within model EF linked to environmental and management variables Ability to gather activity data at sufficient level Ability to predict changes in key management and environmental variables
16
THANK YOU!
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.