1. Funding opportunities at NIH, the review process and thoughts related to achieving success March 11, 2009 NYU Stephen Korn, Ph.D. Director of Training and Career Development NINDS, NIH

2. 1. Preliminary Musings 2. Some Factual Stuff 3. Some Statistics 4. More Musings

3. As of November, 2008… “It’s a great time to be a new investigator”

4. Now… It’s still a great time to be a new investigator for most of you

5. Opportunities to do science are fantastic ● Fellowship success rates good (20-45%) ● Career Award success rates quite good (~35-40%) ● K99/R00 was created (~20%) ● Higher paylines than for established investigators ● Targets to be met From FY07 to FY09, ~1500 R01 awards per year made to new investigators (~128 at NINDS alone – 25-30%tile) ● Director’s New Innovator Award created ● Up to $1.5M over 5 years ● 61 awards made in 2007, 2008

6. ESI (10 years since degree) vs New investigator (no major NIH grants yet) And it goes on…

7. We’ll talk about jobs later

8. HAVE A LONG-RANGE PLAN ● Where are you going and how are you going to get there. ● Keep your eyes on the target and your progress. ● Be proactive.

9. What should you be thinking about when looking for a training environment? ● High quality science ● Significant science ● Exciting science ● Strong mentorship ● Great lab environment (people) ● Institutional support for research ● Support of independence

10. Some Factual Stuff

11. ● 27 Institutes or Centers (ICs) ● Each IC has its own mission ● Each IC has its own budget ● Each IC has its own activities ● Each IC has its own ways of doing things ● Each IC has its own personality National Institutes of Health When you’re planning to submit a grant, check with program directors from different institutes to determine their specific policies and interest in your science.

12. Funding Opportunities for Trainees The Main Menu

13. Fellowships ● F30 – NRSA for MD/PhDs ● F31 – NRSA predoc. fellowship (5 year max) ● F32 – NRSA postdoc. fellowship (3 year max) Institutional Training Grants ● T32 – NRSA institutional training grant – pre and postdoc ● K12 – Mentored clinical scientist development award Funding Opportunities

14. Mentored Career Development Awards ● K01 – Mentored scientist; IC-specific uses ● K08, K23 – For clinicians doing basic or clinical research ● K25 - Mentored quantitative research Career Transition Awards ● K99/R00 - Pathway to Independence Award ● K22 – Career Transition Award; IC-specific Funding Opportunities

15. Independent Career Development Awards ● K02 – Research Scientist Development NINDS: Clinicians only before R01 Others: MD or PHD, Career Development after R01 ● K24 – Midcareer award in patient-oriented research Funding Opportunities

16. Some Relevant Characteristics of Different Mechanisms

17. For all NRSA fellowships, and all K awards except K99/R00, applicants must be a U.S. citizen or permanent resident.

18. Predoc (F31): 1-5 years, primarily stipend Postdoc (F32): 1-3 years, primarily stipend ALL POSTDOCS should be applying K awards: generally 3 – 5 years, provide salary, fringe, research costs and protected time (most require 75% effort devoted to research) Details for all mechanisms vary by IC

19. The K99/R00 Transition to Independence Award

20. ● What the K99/R00 was intended to do Speed the transition to R01 and thus reduce the age of applicants getting 1 st one ● What the K99/R00 does Facilitates the transition to a good academic position ● Who gets the K99/R00 The most creative, scientifically sound, articulate postdocs

21. K99/R00 Must have less than 5 yrs. postdoc. res. experience 2 years K99 (mentored) 75% effort required $90,000 total cost, up to $50,000 salary Exceptions related to salary (MD, other) 3 years R00 (independent) must have tenure track or equivalent position must get appropriate startup package 75% effort on research required $249,000 total cost

22. K99/R00 K99 phase (mentored) IC-specific salary differences IC-specific research expense differences IC-specific duration differences R00 phase (independent) IC-specific duration differences Administrative review – undoubtedly IC differences In the program announcement, there’s a web table listing all of the IC-specific information. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/contacts/pa-07-297_contacts.htm

23. K99 Fundamentals ● Open to U.S. and Non-U.S. Citizens ● Both phases must be done in the U.S. ● For NINDS, must do at least 1 full year in K99 phase – varies by IC ● Can submit amended application, but must be within 5 year rule ● Must be in mentored position to apply

24. For the K99, reviewers are looking for the Duck

25. Research Grants for Independent Scientists

26. The Main R-series Grants Large Research Grant (R01) 4-5 years, $250,000 or more/yr Exploratory Research Grant (R21) High Risk/High Reward 2 years, $275,000 total Small Grant (R03) 2 year max, $50,000/yr max Generally not a good approach Acad. Res. Enhancement Award (R15) primarily undergrad institutions

27. The Main R-series Grants Large Research Grant (R01) 4-5 years, $250,000 or more/yr Exploratory Research Grant (R21) High Risk/High Reward 2 years, $275,000 total Small Grant (R03) 2 year max, $50,000/yr max Generally not a good approach Acad. Res. Enhancement Award (R15) primarily undergrad institutions

28. ●R41…R44 (STTR/SBIR) – Supports collaboration between researchers and small business ●P-type (program projects and centers) ●U-type (cooperative agreements) Other Funding for Independent Scientists

29. Application Preparation and Review

30. What happens when you submit an application? Center for Scientific Review Scientific Review Group/ IC Review Branch Program, NINDS Advisory Council-NINDS Institute Director FUNDING DECISION

31. What is a study section (scientific review group)?

32. Your application is reviewed at study section by: ● Experts ● Non-experts ● People who are reading lots of grants ● People who want to be excited by science ● People who will be irritated by a sloppy application Submit a high quality application! Have people review your application critically WELL BEFORE submission

34. Hypothesis-Driven Research vs Discovery Science

35. What is required for a good training grant application? ● Significant research question ● Clear hypotheses ● Clear tests of hypotheses ● Feasibility ● Excellent career development plan ● Excellent mentoring ● Appropriate institutional support ● High quality publications ● Plans to evaluate progress

36. But some of this will change – more later

37. Hypothesis-Driven vs. Discovery Science

38. The specific aims page is your hook Make it as perfect as possible

39. DO NOT BE BORING! DO NOT BE SLOPPY! DO NOT MAKE IT DIFFICULT FOR THE REVIEWERS! Write clearly, coherently, logically DO NOT BE BORING! DO NOT BE SLOPPY! DO NOT MAKE IT DIFFICULT FOR THE REVIEWERS!

40. You may not be funded on the first submission You may not even get a score!

41. DO NOT TAKE REJECTION PERSONALLY! PERSIST!

42. When you miss the funding range, respond to reviewer comments appropriately

43. Things will change dramatically in the near future ● Length change; 25 → ~12 pages for R01, Ks ● Length change; 10 → ~ 6 pages for Fs ● Length changes for other mechanisms ● Change in scoring system ● More structured review ● Change in review criteria ● A2 eliminated – only get 2 shots http://enhancing-peer-review.nih.gov/calendar.html Click on link to “slides”

44. Some Statistics

45. NIH-wide F Success Rates Fiscal Year Number Reviewed Number Awarded Total cost awarded (x1000) Success Rate 2 2008 3,9201,281$52,93232.7% 20074,2431,277$52,34930.1% 20064,4071,267$52,82428.7% 20054,0001,237$51,08630.9% 20043,6181,272$50,63835.2% 20033,0301,193$47,45539.4% 20022,3691,050$38,43944.3% 20012,4901,230$41,72949.4% 20002,5841,219$39,57147.2% 19992,6391,159$37,89544.6% 19982,8391,159$30,98340.8% 19973,0751,210$32,29739.3%

46. 2007 20062005 2003 NIA642640.6%16.7%15.8% 53.8% NIAAA513364.7%67.5%73.5% 54.8% NIDA1336649.6%47.5%40.6% 60.3% NIDCD963738.5%39.6%41.9% 66.0% NIMH2999030.1%25.0%25.5% 35.0% NINDS3989323.4%20.8%21.6% 27.4% F31 Statistics appsawrds--------Success rates--------- ================================================================================================================

47. F32 success rates In FY08, NINDS fellowship success rate = 22%

48. Increase in the number of Fellowship (F31, F32) applications, 2003 - 2007

49. Applications# Apps.Awards% Success FY2007731419 FY2008851619 Total1583019 Applicants MD4125 MD/PHD9111 PhD1192824 Other500 Total1373022 K99/R00 NINDS

50. K99/R00 results thus far for NINDS 17 of the first 19 awardees (through awards made 1/2008) have jobs (2 are weighing offers) 3 of those who got awards after 1/2008 have jobs

51. # Applications# Awarded% Success MD38616 MD-PhD611220 PhD87415918 Other45613 Total1,01818318 Male5059318 Female3186219 Unknown1952814 Citizen4038120 Non-resident641320 Resident1142219 Unknown4376715 K99/R00 NIH-wide FY2007

52. Activity Number Reviewed Number Awarded Success Rate* Total Cost Awarded K0144317239%26,926,629 K02722738%3,398,620 K07842935%3,805,123 K0850922244%30,178,636 K12361953%11,846,194 K221152623%4,066,411 K2357421638%31,635,924 K24974951%7,776,530 K25502448%3,072,154 NIH-wide Career Awards, 2008 K99 795 180 23% 17,195,013

53. Mech.200820072006 NewP01 34%27%22% New R0119% 16% New R0322%24%19% New R1526%24% New R2117%16%15% Cont P0141%47%43% Cont R0135%36%34% ContR1546%49%42% NIH-wide RPG Success Rates, FY2007

54. Keep in mind, success rates are underestimates because of how they’re calculated Applicant success rate is higher!

55. Miscellaneous Musings

56. A research career is a blast… But you have to be good

57. Evaluate yourself honestly (not what you wish, but what is)

58. When you look around you, are you one of the best predocs or postdocs you know? If not, do you want to be? What do you want? When you read your grant, do you think the leader in your field would be impressed? ● If not, keep writing. ● You must get rid of your ego and be honest with regard to your writing ● You must get help (from your mentor)

59. You are ultimately the person responsible for your success You must have some first author papers in good journals Interviews and lab situations are two way streets – you must get what you need to succeed If you are in a bad situation, get out

60. Remember to HAVE FUN & HAVE A LIFE (those who don’t choose not to!)

61. And Keep your chin up and keep moving forward It’s bad all over right now – just hang in there Ok, let’s talk jobs

62. If you have questions: Email or Call Program Director - questions related to science Training Director (e.g. me at NINDS) - for questions related to mechanisms, application preparation, etc. Who you need to speak with will vary by institute