Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byThomasina Cooper Modified over 9 years ago
1
Therapeutic results of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma LNH 2008 Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes en Tunisie Sousse, 25 th May 2012
2
Introduction LNH 2008: third protocol …after LNH 97 and LNH 2002 Between september 2008- august 2011
3
LNH 97 LNH 2002 aa-IPI=0, 16-65y 3CHOP+RT aa-IPI=0, 16-70y aa-IPI=1,2,3 16-55 4 ACVBP+conso aa-IPI=1, 16-60y 4 R-ACVBP+ Auto aa-IPI=2-3,16-60y aa-IPI=1,2,3, 56-65y 8 (R)-CHOP aa-IPI=1,2,3, 61-70y aa-IPI=0, > 65y 4 mini-CEOP+RT aa-IPI=0, > 70y aa-IPI=1,2,3, > 65y 6 CVP or 6 mini-CEOP aa-IPI=1,2,3, > 70y
5
LNH 2002 OS = 58%
6
LNH 2002-1 OS = 87 %
7
LNH 2002-2A OS = 82%
8
LNH 2002-2B OS = 46%
9
LNH 2002-3 OS = 52%
10
LNH 2002-5 OS = 38%
11
3 d prospective protocol LNH 2008 September 2008- August 2011 Oncology Tunis: 65 patients Hematology Tunis HO: 47 patients Oncology Sousse: 31 patients Hematology+Oncology Sfax: 27 patients Hematology Military: 22 patients Hematology Monastir: 20 patients Hematology Sousse: 17 patients CNGMO
12
LNH 2008 Risk Stratification aa- IPI aa- IPI 0 2008-1 2008-4 2008-4 1 2008-2A 2008-2A 2008-3 2008-3 2008-5 2008-5 2-3 2-3 2008-2B 2008-2B Age 60 y 70 y
13
LNH 2008 (16 - 70 y) B, 0 factor B, 1,2,3 factor(s) 16 - 59 y 60 - 70 y 16 - 59 y 60 - 70 y 2008-1 2008-2 2008-3 2008-1 2008-2 2008-3 6 R - CHOP 14 8 R-CHOP 14 8 R-CHOP 21 Prognostic Factors : LDH > 1N ; Stage III, IV ; PS > 2 1 factor 2-3 factors 2008-2A 2008-2B 4 R-ACVBP + PBSCT
14
LNH 2008 (> 70 y) Prognostic Factors : LDH > 1N ; Stage III, IV ; PS > 2 2008-4 2008-5 6 R-CHOP 21 6 mini CEOP B >75 y or B, 71-75 1,2,3 factor(s) B, 71-75 PS > 2, 1,2,3 factor(s) B, 71-75 y, PS<2 0, 1, 2 factor(s)
15
Patient’ characteristics Age: 54 y (16-86y) Gender: M: 136 sex-ratio: 1.46 F: 93 6 groups: LNH 2008-1: 60 patients LNH 2008-2A: 50 patients LNH 2008-2B: 51 patients LNH 2008-3: 23 patients LNH 2008-4: 13 patients LNH 2008-5: 32 patients
16
Sites at diagnosis Site of diagnosis (%) All12A2B345 Nodes 46245965265447 GIT 2232236262322 ORL 143226181512 Skin 32426 Others 1510122130813
17
Sites at diagnosis Site of diagnosis (%) All12A2B345 Nodes 46245965265447 GIT 2232236262322 ORL 143226181512 Skin 32426 Others 1510122130813
18
Sites at diagnosis Site of diagnosis (%) All12A2B345 Nodes 46245965265447 GIT 2232236262322 ORL 143226181512 Skin 32426 Others 1510122130813
19
Localisation (%) All12A2B345 Nodal352541 223140 Nodal + extra nodal 32181543484622 Extra nodal 33572416302338
20
Localisation (%) All12A2B345 Nodal352541 223140 Nodal + extra nodal 32181543484622 Extra nodal 33572416302338
21
Localisation (%) All12A2B345 Nodal352541 223140 Nodal + extra nodal 32181543484622 Extra nodal 33572416302338
22
Pronostic factors %All12A2B345 B41102878573853 ECOG 2-3 19023748041 LDH5005465703950 III-IV4804196706253 E57774451576250 Bulky16714414812
23
Pronostic factors %All12A2B345 B41102878573853 ECOG 2-3 19023748041 LDH5005465703950 III-IV4804196706253 E57774451576250 Bulky16714414812
24
Response %All12A2B345 CR75948254708466 PR63410906 Failure1331222121618 Death602169010
25
Response %All12A2B345 CR75948254708466 PR63410906 Failure1331222121618 Death602169010
26
Response %All12A2B345 CR75948254708466 PR63410906 Failure1331222121618 Death602169010
27
Response LNH 2008-2B CR+PR: 32 patients Auto: 23 patients
28
Toxicity %All12A2B345 Time between cures 7978 747788 G-CSF4530528630466 Grade 3-4 164143822233 Death60216909
29
Toxicity %All12A2B345 Time between cures 7978 747788 G-CSF4530528630466 Grade 3-4 164143822233 Death60216909
30
Relapse (18 patients) All12A2B345 N%N% 18 10 2424 5 12 1414 3 19 4 36 3 14
31
Relapse (18 patients) All12A2B345 N%N% 18 10 2424 5 12 1414 3 19 4 36 3 14
32
Final Assessment (median follow-up:18 months) %All12A2B345 CR172927464614662 CR232648 Progression 434615 Death2131632353138
33
Final Assessment %All12A2B345 CR172927464614662 CR232648 Progression 434615 Death2131632353138
34
Final Assessment %All12A2B345 CR172927464614662 CR232648 Progression 434615 Death2131632353138
35
LNH 2008 OS = 75%
36
LNH 2008 EFS = 69%
37
LNH 2008-1 OS = 93%
38
LNH 2008-1 EFS = 90%
39
LNH 2008-2A OS = 79%
40
LNH 2008-2A EFS = 71%
41
LNH 2008-2B OS = 67%
42
LNH 2008-2B EFS = 59%
43
LNH 2008-3 OS = 62%
44
LNH 2008-3 EFS = 54%
45
LNH 2008-4 OS = 63%
46
LNH 2008-4 EFS = 41%
47
LNH 2008-5 OS = 56%
48
LNH 2008-5 EFS = 61%
49
Conclusions LNH 2008-1: 6 R-CHOP14 is a good option (CHOP+RT) LNH 2008-2A: 8 R-CHOP14 / 4 R-ACVBP+conso LNH 2008-2B: 4 R-ACVBP toxicity++ PBSCT is the standard LNH 2008-3: 8 R-CHOP 21 +++ LNH 2008-4: testing for treatment of elderly patients with CHOP (EFS < 2008-5) LNH 2008-5: 6 R-miniCEOP
50
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS All the members of GELT Ben Lakhal Raihane Ben Othman Tarek Elloumi Moez Gharbi Olfa Mezlini Amel Msadek Fehmi Toumi Nabil Zahra Kmira Laatiri M. Adnène
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.