Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMartin Hill Modified over 9 years ago
1
Supporting (Troubled) Families in Hampshire Winchester City Council Provider Event July 2013
2
Background – National Programme Civil unrest over 5 days of August 2011 Prime Minister’s commitment re 120,000 families Troubled Family Unit – Department for Communities and Local Government Emphasis on Public Services working differently together National Efficiency – Families cost £9bn per year (£75,000 each p/a) and cross cut every Public Sector Agency
3
The Hampshire ‘ambition’ 1,590 families across Hampshire over the next 3 years (approx 80-90 in Winchester) Improved outcomes and lasting positive changes to the lives of families Greater inter-agency coordination and more effective partnership working with whole families Challenging and changing the way we work – Not just more of the same 3 year programme, but sustainable transformational change
4
National definition Troubled families are households who: 1.Are involved in youth crime and/or anti-social behaviour; 2.Have children not in school (<85% attendance, 3 fixed term exclusions, permanently excluded, or head teacher discretion); 3.Have an adult on out of work benefits. …..and as a result cause high costs to the public purse. Local discretion filters can also be used by partners. DCLG funding claimed for those families meeting at least two of the three criteria Not about chasing the money – if a family will benefit they will be included
5
Programme Structure and Governance STFP Management Group (Chair: Paul Archer, Director Policy & Governance, HCC) STFP Partnership Board (Chair: Cllr Keith Mans) STFP Strategic Coordinator and Programme Team Ian Langley, Gary Westbrook, Volker Buck HCC Accountable Body DCLG Troubled Families Unit 10 Local Co-ordination Groups based on District Council Areas (Havant & E Hants Combined)
6
Delivery Approach Multi Agency Identification of Families Single Family Plans for every family Twin Track Approach – Intensive Support Service and Local Solutions Independent Evaluation and Strategic Business Case 1,095 Families 495 Families “TRANSFORM” Centrally commissioned Intensive Family Support Services Locally determined solutions
7
The Single Family Plan Not another assessment Sharing information at the family level – no organisation has the complete picture Simple action plan – what will make the difference Looking at the whole family and not just individual members Joined up approach – 1 family, 1 plan, 1 joined up approach SafetyNet Family engagement and consent
8
What’s new about this approach? 1 Family, 1 Plan, One joined up approach Not a new service to “refer” into. But a new way of working One agency/one professional leading the work (doesn’t mean they ‘do everything’) Using existing assessments rather than further resource being used for further assessment Statutory & voluntary agencies working & targeting precious resources together Family based information/intelligence sharing It’s everybody’s core business!
9
10 Local Coordination groups and SROs in place Year 1 cohort (530 families) identified Single family plans and lead agencies in place for approximately 500 families SafetyNet – Single “family” view Evaluation Partner (University of Portsmouth) appointed Intensive Family Support Service (IFSS) provider appointed Year One Progress
10
Family Engagement Nominations to “Transform” Monitoring progress with year 1 families Year 2 cohort of families Embedding a new way of sharing information and joining up service delivery at the family level… Year Two and Next Steps
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.