Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAnna Johnston Modified over 9 years ago
1
What would you recommend as first line therapy for a 68 y/o woman with advanced pancreatic cancer and limited metastatic disease with ECOG-1? Gemcitabine plus nab-Paclitaxel Maeve Lowery MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
2
Von Hoff et al, NEJM 2013
5
Updated MPACT Results GI ASCO 2014 Median overall survival remained significantly longer on combination arm 4% of patient on gem-nab-P arm alive at 3 years, none in gem arm Prespecified subgroups: KPS, age, presence of liver met, elevated Ca 19.9 associated with worse outcomes, Combination therapy reduced negative survival association of elevated Ca 19.9 (homogeneity of biliary decompression not known) No grade 4 neuropathy, 17% grade 3 median time to improvements 29 days, half could resume treatment.
9
Modified FOLFIRINOX (MSKCC)
10
Modified FOLFIRNOX (MSKCC)
11
How Can We Compare the Data? Trial enrolled different patient populations (older pts, ECOG 2 included in MPACT) MPACT trial performed in both community and academic centers, USA, Europe and Australia – results are more broadly applicable in variety of clinical settings We just know both combinations are more effective than Gemcitabine …
12
Why Gem & nab-P? Toxicity profile (less febrile neutropenia, neuropathy reversible) More likely to be given in combination with experimental therapy Limited metastatic disease, ECOG 1 No mediport In practice, FOLFIRINOX is given as a modified regimen in US academic centers
13
Is there a Better Way to Select Therapy? Clinical characteristics Blood biomarkers – CTCs – Pharmacogenomic profiling – cfDNA Tissue biomarkers – Genotyping – Protein expression
14
Heinemann et al, Cancer Treatment Reviews, Volume 40, Issue 1, 2014, 118 - 128 SPARC Expression as Biomarker of Response to Gem & nab-P Phase I/II study, high SPARC expression was associated with a significantly longer OS vs. low SPARC expression Median OS 17.8 vs. 8.1 months; p = 0.0431 [n = 36]
20
AB Results (N=35)
21
Conclusions Gem & nab-P appropriate for 1 st line therapy, especially in ECOG 1, limited disease burden Where possible, patients will eventually receive both treatments in sequence We need better predictive biomarkers to select 1 st line therapy in advanced PAC It’s good to have options…
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.