Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySara Caldwell Modified over 9 years ago
1
Case Studies in Prenatal Diagnosis and Access to Abortion Joanna Erdman Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University Nova Scotia, Canada 15 October 2012 III Latin American Legal Conference on Reproductive Rights
2
Rethinking Abortion and the Law: Transnational Perspectives (UPenn Press 2014) How we advocate, regulate & adjudicate on abortion Ideas that influence, underlie & give meaning to legal reforms Relevant questions, persuasive arguments & foreseeable answers
3
Rethinking Abortion and the Law: Transnational Perspectives (UPenn Press 2014) Luís Roberto Barroso, Legal Strategies Involving Anencephalic Fetuses Paola Bergallo, The Indications Model in Argentina Lisa Kelly, Innocent Suffering in Abortion Law Julieta Lemaitre, Catholic Constitutionalism on Sex, Women and Life Alejandro Madrazo, Prenatal Life: Narrative and Strategy Verónica Undurraga, Proportionality in Constitutional Review
4
The relationship in human rights law between: Prenatal or fetal diagnostic technology & Access to safe and lawful abortion
5
Case Studies Brazilian Supreme Court: ADPF (2012) Lawful access to termination for anencephalic pregnancies European Court of HR: RR v. Poland (2011) Access to prenatal testing to confirm fetal diagnosis
6
Case Studies Traditional Reading Exception and Hierarchy Vulnerability, Suffering and Mercy Progressive Reading Women’s agency and capacity Rights in Reproductive Decision-Making
7
Brazil: ADPF 54 Abstract Constitutional Review: National Confederation of Health Workers & ANIS Anencephaly: fatal fetal neural tube defect Exceptions: Rape & Life Implied Exception? – Judicial Interpretation Varied Outcomes Physical, Financial and Psychological Burdens
8
Brazil: ADPF 54 Asserted a woman’s right to terminate an anencephalic pregnancy As a general legal rule, requiring no prior authorization
9
Brazil: ADPF 54 Factual Findings Fatal & untreatable (distinct from disability) Certain diagnosis on objective medical criteria Brain activity: consistent legal standard
10
Brazil: ADPF 54 Legal Argument 1. Premature Delivery v. Abortion Not human intervention, but congenital deformity 2. No Prenatal Life = No Right to Life No justification for state intervention
11
Brazil: ADPF 54 “Because it is absolutely unviable, the anencephalic fetus cannot be entitled to a right to life. The conflict between fundamental rights is only apparent. Strictly speaking, at the other side of the scale, as opposed to women's rights, is not the right to life and human dignity of the those who are to come, precisely because there is no one to come, there is no viable life.”
12
Brazil: ADPF 54 Supreme Court Judgment Therapeutic Premature Delivery (vs. abortion) Lawful under Penal Code & Constitutionally Required BUT – No Exception to General Prohibition
13
Brazil: ADPF 54 Broader Social Impact Ignite Debate on Decriminalization Recognize Concept of Reproductive Rights Constitutional Principle of Dignity Focus and Justify Women’s Experience & Suffering No Countervailing Value/Justification in Right to Life Avenue to Reproductive Freedom/Decision- Making … within tragic circumstances
14
ECHR: RR v. Poland Narrow & Particular Prenatal Diagnosis of Severe Fetal Condition Broad & Strategic Women’s Decision-Making in Pregnancy and Reproduction Channels Vulnerability and Agency
15
ECHR: RR v. Poland Indication: severe or fatal condition, until viability Prenatal tests by ordinance until 22 weeks Ultrasounds & blood tests indicate fetal condition Amniocentesis: recommended, delayed & refused 23 rd week: Turner’s syndrome confirmed Past gestational limit
16
ECHR: RR v. Poland Violation: Free from inhuman/degrading treatment Conduct: Manipulation and Procrastination … Harm: Causing Suffering in Uncertainty Conduct: Deliberate Intention … Harm: To Frustrate exercise of legal right
17
ECHR: RR v. Poland Violation: Respect for physical and psychological integrity Denied access to diagnostic services v. abortion … Harm: Denied Right to Access Health Information Right to Information = Right to Autonomy … Harm: Denied right to Reproductive Freedom In decision-making about pregnancy, treatment, future plans
18
Case Studies Rather than access to abortion … granted in mercy and compassion Recognize and respect women … as decision makers in pregnancy & reproduction
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.