1. 7. 10. 2015 1 Multicriteria assessment of the ergonomic risk probability creation by chosen groups of stakeholders with using AHP method within the context of CSR Faculty of Materials Science and Technology, STU Trnava Authors: Rastislav Beňo, Katarína Drieniková, Tomáš Naňo, Peter Sakál

2. 7. 10. 2015 2 THIS ARTICLE WAS SUPPORTED BY THE SLOVAK RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY UNDER THE CONTRACT No. LPP- 0384-09: CONCEPT OF HCS MODEL VS. CONCEPT CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR)“. THIS PAPER IS ALSO A PART OF KEGA PROJECT „CREATING OF A NEW COURSE „SUSTAINABLE CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY WITHIN THE STUDY PROGRAM INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT ON THE SECOND STAGE AT THE FACULTY OF MATERIALS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SUT TRNAVA“.

3. 7. 10. 2015 3 3 Content 1 Ergonomics and ergonomics risks 2 Stakeholders and CSR 3 AHP method 4 Multicriteria assessment of the ergonomic risk probability creation by chosen groups of stakeholders with using AHP method within the context of CSR

4. 7. 10. 2015 4 Ergonomics and ergonomics risks -Turbulent market conditions, influence of economics, monetary crisis, moral crisis, technological progress => productitvity increase => work environment risks; -Risk prevention done by ergonomics (illustrated via probability „P“ and consequence „C“); -R = P*C; -Risk factors: modifiable and unmodifiable.

5. 7. 10. 2015 5 Ergonomics and ergonomics risks Tab. 1 Assess of risk degree P1P2P3P4P5 D1HHHHH D2HHHHH D3HHMMM D4HMMLL D5MMLLL Probability of occurrencePossible consequence of P1 Almost certainD1Fatal, permanent inability to work P2 Very probableD2Need for long term treatment P3 Not usual, but possibleD3Short term treatment P4 Low probableD4Need of longer rest P5 Practically improbableD5Need of shorter rest

6. 7. 10. 2015 6 Stakeholders and CSR - Responsibility towards society; -Definition: “CSR is a concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis”; -Stakeholders: shareholders, employees, customers, suppliers and distributors, local communities, competition, media, public, NGOs, government, other business partners; -Employees as a one of the most important internal stakeholders.

7. 7. 10. 2015 7 AHP method - Analytic hierarchy process method Three levels: oHierarchy, oPriority, oConsistency. - Expert Choice 11.5

8. 7. 10. 2015 8 AHP method

9. 7. 10. 2015 9 AHP method Tab. 2 AHP fundamental scale Intensity of importance DefinitionExplanation 1Equal importanceTwo activities contribute equally to the objective. 3Moderate ImportanceExperience and judgement slightly favour one activity over another. 5Strong ImportanceExperience and judgement strongly favour one activity over another. 7Very strong or demonstrated importance An activity is favoured very strongly over another; its dominance demonstrated in practice. 9Extreme ImportanceThe evidence favouring one activity over another is of the highest possible order of affirmation. 2,4,6,8Intermediate values between 2 adjacent scale values Compromise is needed between two levels.

10. 7. 10. 2015 10 AHP method -Saaty’s matrix: -Consistency

11. 7. 10. 2015 11 Multicriteria assessment of the ergonomic risk probability creation by chosen groups of stakeholders with using AHP method within the context of CSR

12. 7. 10. 2015 12 Multicriteria assessment of the ergonomic risk probability creation by chosen groups of stakeholders with using AHP method within the context of CSR

13. 7. 10. 2015 13 Thank you for your attention!