1. Oregon’s K-12 ELL/SPED students: Data & outcomes

3. Monitoring of disproportionality by federal and state education departments. Basic Facts related to Oregon’s SPED/ELL students. What does Oregon’s K-12 ELL/SPED population data suggest? Awareness of the implications this information has for your district. Objectives

4. Race2009 Population Absolute Change 2000 – 2009 Percentage Change 2000 - 2009 Total307,806,55024,834,5398.8 Non-Hispanic258,587,22612,057,6484.9 White199,851,2404,088,4482.1 Black37,681,5443,276,6619.5 AIAN2,360,807256,56412.2 Asian13,686,0833,233,41730.9 NHPI448,51079,26021.5 Two or More Races4,559,0421,123,29832.7 Hispanic48,419,32412,776,94535.8 U.S. POPULATION CHANGE BY RACE & ETHNICITY, 2000-2009

5. Race Absolute Change 2000 - 2009Percent of Total Total24,834,539100 Non-Hispanic12,057,64848.6 White4,088,44816.5 Black3,276,66113.4 American Indian256,5641.0 Asian3,233,41713.0 Native Hawaiian79,2600.3 Two or More Races1,123,2984.5 Hispanic12,776,94551.4 SHARES OF NET POPULATION GROWTH 2000-2009

6. 1997-19982009-20101997-98 to 2009-10 Number of students Percent of all students Number of students Percent of all students Change in number of students Percent change White452,16383.7%379,03867.5%-73,125-16.2% African American 14,1392.6%15,4852.8%1,3469.5% Hispanic43,7128.1%109,84219.6%66,130151.3% Asian/Pacific Islander 19,1893.6%25,9274.6%6,73835.1% Native American 11,1562.1%10,8501.9%-306-2.7% Multi- race/ethnic N/A15,1902.7% Not reportedN/A5,3661.0% Oregon Relevance

7. Oregon K-12 Ethnicity Categories all Students 1997-1998

9. Title VI 1964 Civil Rights Act:

10. Civil Rights Act: protection from racial & language discrimination Under Title VI it’s illegal to discriminate based on: race, color, and national origin. Office of Civil Rights works to prevent school districts assigning students to special education programs solely on basis of students’ inability to speak English. Overrepresentation implicates issues of racial, cultural, linguistic diversity, and disability status.

11. ELL students also protected by Equal Educational Opportunities Act: EEOA: prohibits discrimination of educational services to any student because of race, color, sex, or national origin.  Office of Civil Rights responsible EEOA enforcement.  Includes standard to determine if school district meeting legal obligations to ELL students, and  Prohibits “… failure by an educational agency to take appropriate action to overcome language barriers that impede equal participation by its students in its instructional programs.”

12. Disproportionality: – The state of being disproportional – Disproportional: out of proportion Disproportionality

13. WHAPIAAMNX 67.5%19.6%4.6%2.8%2.7%1.9%1% Example of special education disproportionality WHAPIAAMNX 35%25%4.6%22.4%6%4%3% The over or under-representation of a specific race or ethnicity in a given category as compared to a typical standard

14.  1998-1999 African American students = 14.8% of population but = 20.2% of students with disabilities.  2000 -2007 a 35% increase in minority student enrollment in public education.  2009-10 African American students = 12.6% of population, but average rate of identification w/ Intellectual Disability across states = 25.5%.  African American Students identified w/ Intellectual Disability and Emotional Disturbance at greater rates than White students. Why Monitor Disproportionality? Alexa Posny, Director OSEP explains:

15. What implications does this data have for K-12 education and educators in Oregon?

17. Eligibility

18. Identification for special education by race/ethnicity : B9 Inappropriate Identification 1.≥10 students in special education by race/ethnicity category, and 2.≥10 students in special education across other race/ethnicity categories, and 3.+20% difference in the identified special education population from the overall district population by race/ethnicity category, and 4.Weighted risk ratio of >4.0 by race/ethnicity category

19. Identification by race/ethnicity by disability type: B10 Inappropriate Identification 1.≥10 students in disability category by race/ethnicity, and 2.≥10 students in disability category across other race/ethnicity categories, and 3.+20% difference in the disability category from the overall district population by race/ethnicity category, and 4.Weighted risk ratio of >4.0 by race/ethnicity category

22. K-12 Oregon 2010-2011 SPED Eligibility Categories

23. K-12 Eligibility Categories – ELL/SPED 2010-2011

24. Placement

25. B5 Federal Placement Distribution Measurement State Target Regular Class 80% or more of their day 70% or more Regular Class less than 40% 10.8% or less Separate School or Residential Facility 2.0 or less Federal placement distribution (LRE) by setting and race/ethnicity:

30. 1.≥ 3 students in special education by race/ethnicity category who received long-term discipline, and 2.+20% difference in the special education race/ethnicity population who received long-term discipline from the overall district population by race/ethnicity category 3.risk ratio analysis of >2.0* by race/ethnicity category – Incidence = cumulative # of suspension or expulsion incidents – Duration = suspension or expulsion totaling greater than 10 days – Type = out of school suspension or expulsion Long-term discipline: incidence, duration, type and interim service delivery B4A - by race/ethnicity B4B

32. ELL/SPED student outcomes

33. Grade K – 12 ELL RLA Meet/Exceed K-12 SPED RLA Meet/Exceed K-12 SPED/ELL RLA Meet/Exceed 3 rd 61% 52%37% 4 th 64% 53%37% 5 th 39% 41%21%

34. Grade K – 12 ELL RLA Meet/Exceed K-12 SPED RLA Meet/Exceed K-12 SPED/ELL RLA Meet/Exceed 6 th 34% 40%20% 7 th 30% 40%21% 8 th 18% 30%13% 11 th 23% (HS) 43%20%

35. 2009-10 Oregon Graduation Rates (2005-06 9 th Grade Cohort) Cohort 2005-2006 4 year cohort Non ELL67.6 4 year cohort ELL51.4 5 year cohort Non ELL70.3 5 year cohort ELL57.2

36. Resources: http://www.ode.state.or.us/teachlearn/testing/ad min/alt/ea/ed_policy_analysis_archives- disproreparticle_2.pdf http://www.ode.state.or.us/teachlearn/testing/ad min/alt/ea/ed_policy_analysis_archives- disproreparticle_2.pdf http://www.nasponline.org/publications/cq/pdf/V 38N7_CulturallyCompetentAssessment.pdf http://www.nasponline.org/publications/cq/pdf/V 38N7_CulturallyCompetentAssessment.pdf http://www.nccrest.org/Briefs/Legal_Brief.pdf http://nepc.colorado.edu/files/ResourceSheet_Sch ool_10-3.pdf http://nepc.colorado.edu/files/ResourceSheet_Sch ool_10-3.pdf

37. Thank you for your attention!!