Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The Future of Scholarly Communication | UC Berkeley Academic Values and Scholarly Communication Practices: An Analysis of Faculty Choice and Opinion in.

Published byRussell Atkinson Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "The Future of Scholarly Communication | UC Berkeley Academic Values and Scholarly Communication Practices: An Analysis of Faculty Choice and Opinion in."— Presentation transcript:

1 The Future of Scholarly Communication | UC Berkeley Academic Values and Scholarly Communication Practices: An Analysis of Faculty Choice and Opinion in Twelve Disciplines Diane Harley, Ph.D., Principal Investigator Center for Studies in Higher Education University of California, Berkeley Project Website and Associated Document Links: http://cshe.berkeley.edu/research/scholarlycommunication Copenhagen, December 1, 2008 Copyright 2008, Center for Studies in Higher Education

2 The Future of Scholarly Communication | UC Berkeley Case Study Approach: Disciplines Current project: 7 new disciplines 150 interviews to-date/various stakeholders/attendance at many meetings (such as this) Archaeology (including Classics and Mediterranean, overlap with history and art history) Astrophysics Life Sciences (Biology/Molecular and Cell Biology, including sampling faculty participating in large interdisciplinary projects) Economics History (the entire field plus sampling collaborative, interdisciplinary centers and projects) Music (incl. emphasis on electronic composition/performance, ethno musicology) Political Science (initially the entire field, but subsequently focusing on quantitative subfields)

3 The Future of Scholarly Communication | UC Berkeley New Protocol 1)What is required in your field for tenure and promotion? 2)What criteria do you use when choosing a medium for publishing your research results or sharing your research ideas? 3) How has technology affected your scholarly communication practices, if at all? Including: How you share your work with other scholars and keep up to date in a field? How you collaborate with other scholars? At what stage of research? What types of data/resources do you use for your own scholarship? (e.g., the value of data archives, datasets, bibliographic, news sources, etc.) What do you need that you don't have? 4) To what degree do you or your colleagues engage with the public? How? Why or why not? 5) What new, transformational, developments in your field are on the horizon?

4 The Future of Scholarly Communication | UC Berkeley Academic Values and Scholarly Communication Practices: An Analysis of Faculty Choice and Opinion in Twelve Disciplines Diane Harley, Ph.D., Principal Investigator Center for Studies in Higher Education University of California, Berkeley Project Website and Associated Document Links: http://cshe.berkeley.edu/research/scholarlycommunication Copenhagen, December 1, 2008 Copyright 2008, Center for Studies in Higher Education

Download ppt "The Future of Scholarly Communication | UC Berkeley Academic Values and Scholarly Communication Practices: An Analysis of Faculty Choice and Opinion in."

Similar presentations

Knock, Knock!: Are Institutional Repositories a Home for Grey Literature? By Julia Gelfand University of California, Irvine Paper presented.

Knock, Knock!: Are Institutional Repositories a Home for Grey Literature? By Julia Gelfand University of California, Irvine Paper presented.
Service Learning December 9, 2004 Dr. Edward Zlotkowski Senior Fellow, Campus Compact

Service Learning December 9, 2004 Dr. Edward Zlotkowski Senior Fellow, Campus Compact
Transformative Change CSU Summit on the Preparation of Teachers Irvine, California February 14, 2011 Phyllis Fernlund, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Communication.

Transformative Change CSU Summit on the Preparation of Teachers Irvine, California February 14, 2011 Phyllis Fernlund, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Communication.
Science, Technology and Culture Strategy document 2006-2009 October 2006.

Science, Technology and Culture Strategy document October 2006.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,

PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
SMC Academic Senate Ad Hoc Committee on Interdisciplinary Studies Report and Recommendation April 18, 2006.

SMC Academic Senate Ad Hoc Committee on Interdisciplinary Studies Report and Recommendation April 18, 2006.
New promotion and tenure guidelines New peer review processes &

New promotion and tenure guidelines New peer review processes &
California State University faculty librarians: What are our beliefs and actions with regard to scholarly publishing and presentations? Pam Howard California.

California State University faculty librarians: What are our beliefs and actions with regard to scholarly publishing and presentations? Pam Howard California.
Graduate Education at USC 1. The University 2. Being a faculty member 3. Being a student.

Graduate Education at USC 1. The University 2. Being a faculty member 3. Being a student.
International Placements Information Session November 21, 2011 Delivered by: Linda Cooper, RN, BScN, MS, PhD Associate Director, Collaborative Degree Program.

International Placements Information Session November 21, 2011 Delivered by: Linda Cooper, RN, BScN, MS, PhD Associate Director, Collaborative Degree Program.
UCSF Library and Center for Knowledge Management University of California, San Francisco July 15, 2006 Outreach & Collaboration: Small Campus Gail Persily.

UCSF Library and Center for Knowledge Management University of California, San Francisco July 15, 2006 Outreach & Collaboration: Small Campus Gail Persily.
SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CONVOCATION REPORT March 2005.

SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CONVOCATION REPORT March 2005.
Presentation of EQ11 Advisory Group May 6 2011. The Approach Faculty reflections Faculty visit and discussions Discussion papers Our challenge was to.

Presentation of EQ11 Advisory Group May The Approach Faculty reflections Faculty visit and discussions Discussion papers Our challenge was to.
Faculty Rights and Other Scholarly Communication Practices Denise Troll Covey Principal Librarian for Special Projects Carnegie Mellon DLF Forum – Boston,

Faculty Rights and Other Scholarly Communication Practices Denise Troll Covey Principal Librarian for Special Projects Carnegie Mellon DLF Forum – Boston,
Short Term Programs at Columbia University. Why Columbia University?

Short Term Programs at Columbia University. Why Columbia University?
Faculty Senate Report, 2007-2008 James Guffey, President Diane Johnson, President Pro-tempore.

Faculty Senate Report, James Guffey, President Diane Johnson, President Pro-tempore.
DR. BETHANY FLECK & DR. AARON RICHMOND HOT OFF THE PRESS PUBLISHING YOUR S O TL WORK CENTER FOR FACULTY DEVELOPMENT THURSDAY DECEMBER 5 TH, 10:30-11:30AM:

DR. BETHANY FLECK & DR. AARON RICHMOND HOT OFF THE PRESS PUBLISHING YOUR S O TL WORK CENTER FOR FACULTY DEVELOPMENT THURSDAY DECEMBER 5 TH, 10:30-11:30AM:
Moving to the Top 50 Research Administrators April 2, 2014.

Moving to the Top 50 Research Administrators April 2, 2014.
RESEARCH TEAMS OF THE FUTURE Working Groups and Co-Chairs  Interdisciplinary Research Patricia Grady, NINR Ken Olden, NIEHS Larry Tabak, NIDCR  High-risk.

RESEARCH TEAMS OF THE FUTURE Working Groups and Co-Chairs  Interdisciplinary Research Patricia Grady, NINR Ken Olden, NIEHS Larry Tabak, NIDCR  High-risk.
Your Name Oxford Explained. Do we offer a course you would enjoy? Would you find our teaching style engaging? Are you predicted the right grades? Could.

Your Name Oxford Explained. Do we offer a course you would enjoy? Would you find our teaching style engaging? Are you predicted the right grades? Could.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google