1. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Business Ethics Concepts & Cases Manuel G. Velasquez

2. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter Two Ethical Principles in Business

3. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Utilitarianism Actions and policies should be evaluated on the basis of the benefits and costs they will impose on society. The only morally right action in any situation is that whose utility is greatest by comparison to the utility of all the other alternatives. Leading utilitarian theorists: – Jeremy Bentham – John Stuart Mill

4. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. How to Apply Utilitarian Principles First, determine what alternative actions or policies are available to me in that situation. Second, for each alternative action, estimate the direct and indirect benefits and costs that the action will probably produce for all persons affected. Third, for each action, subtract the costs from the benefits to determine the net utility of each action. Fourth, the action that produces the greatest sum total of utility must be chosen as the ethically appropriate course of action.

5. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Criticisms of Utilitarianism Critics say not all values can be measured. – Utilitarians respond that monetary or other commonsense measures can measure everything. Critics say utilitarianism fails with rights and justice. – Utilitarians respond that rule-utilitarianism can deal with rights and justice.

6. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. The Concept of a Right Right = an individual’s entitlement to something. – Legal right = An entitlement that derives from a legal system that permits or empowers a person to act in a specified way or that requires others to act in certain ways toward that person. – Moral (or human) rights = rights that all human beings everywhere possess to an equal extent simply by virtue of being human beings. Legal rights confer entitlements only where the particular legal system is in force. Moral rights confer entitlements to all persons regardless of their legal system.

7. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Moral Rights Can be violated even when “no one is hurt”. Are correlated with duties others have toward the person with the right. Provide individuals with autonomy and equality in the free pursuit of their interests. Provide a basis for justifying one’s actions and for invoking the protection or aid of others. Focus on securing the interests of the individual unlike utilitarian standards which focus on securing the aggregate utility of everyone in society.

8. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Three Kinds of Moral Rights Negative rights require others leave us alone. Positive rights require others help us. Contractual or special rights require others keep their agreements.

9. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Contractual Rights and Duties Created by specific agreements and conferred only on the parties involved. Require publicly accepted rules on what constitutes agreements and what obligations agreements impose. Underlie the special rights and duties imposed by accepting a position or role in an institution or organization. Require (1) the parties know what they are agreeing to, (2) no misrepresentation, (3) no duress or coercion,(4) no agreement to an immoral act.

10. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Kant and Moral Rights Individuals generally must be left equally free to pursue their interests. Moral rights identify the specific interests individuals should be entitled to freely pursue. An interest is important enough to raise to be a right if: – we would not be willing to have everyone deprived of the freedom to pursue that interest – the freedom to pursue that interest is needed to live as free and rational beings.

11. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Kant’s Categorical Imperative (First Version) We must act only on reasons we would be willing to have anyone in a similar situation act on. Requires universalizability and reversibility. Similar to questions: – “What if everyone did that?” – “How would you like it if someone did that to you?”

12. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Kant’s Categorical Imperative (Second Version) Never use people only as a means to your ends, but always treat them as they freely and rationally consent to be treated and help them pursue their freely and rationally chosen ends. Based on the idea that humans have a dignity that makes them different from mere objects. It is, according to Kant, equivalent to the first formulation.

13. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Criticisms of Kant Both versions of the categorical imperative are unclear. Rights can conflict and Kant’s theory cannot resolve such conflicts. Kant’s theory implies moral judgments that are mistaken.

14. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Libertarian Philosophy Freedom from human constraint is necessarily good and that all constraints imposed by others are necessarily evil except when needed to prevent the imposition of greater human constraints. Robert Nozick’s Libertarian Philosophy: – the only moral right is the negative right to freedom – the right to freedom requires private property, freedom of contract, free markets, and the elimination of taxes to pay for social welfare programs

15. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Types of Justice Distributive Justice – requires the just distribution of benefits and burdens. Retributive Justice – requires the just imposition of punishments and penalties. Compensatory Justice – requires just compensation for wrongs or injuries.

16. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Principles of Distributive Justice Fundamental – distribute benefits and burdens equally to equals and unequally to unequals Egalitarian – distribute equally to everyone Capitalist – distribute according to contribution Socialist – distribute according to need and ability Libertarian – distribute by free choices Rawls – distribute by equal liberty, equal opportunity, and needs of disadvantaged.

17. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Retributive and Compensatory Justice Retributive Justice = fairness when blaming or punishing persons for doing wrong. Compensatory Justice = fairness when restoring to a person what the person lost when he or she was wronged by someone else.

18. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Ethic of Care Ethics need not be impartial. Emphasizes preserving and nurturing concrete valuable relationships. We should care for those dependent on and related to us. Because the self requires caring relationships with others, thosae relationships are valuable and should be nurtured.

19. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Objections to Care Approach in Ethics An ethic of care can degenerate into favoritism. – Response: conflicting moral demands are an inherent characteristic of moral choices An ethic of care can lead to “burnout”. – Response: adequate understanding of ethic of care will acknowledge the need of the caregiver to care for him or herself.

20. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Theories of Moral Virtue Aristotle – virtues are habits that enable a person to live according to reason by habitually choosing the mean between extremes in actions and emotions Aquinas – virtues are habits that enable a person to live reasonably in this world and be united with God in the next MacIntyre – virtues are dispositions that enable a person to achieve the good at which human “practices” aim Pincoffs – virtues are dispositions we use when choosing between persons or potential future selves

21. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Objections to Virtue Theories It is inconsistent with psychology which showed that behavior is determined by the external situation, not moral character. – Response: moral character determines behavior in a person’s familiar environment. – Response: recent psychology shows behavior is determined by one’s moral identity which includes one’s virtues and vices.

22. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Unconscious vs. Conscious Moral Decisions Unconscious Moral Decisions – Comprise most of our moral decisions. – Made by the brain’s “X-system” using stored prototypes to automatically and unconsciously identify what it perceives and what it should do. Conscious Moral Decisions – Is used in new, strange, or unusual situations for which the brain has no matching prototypes. – Consists of the conscious, logical but slow processes of the brain’s “C-system”. – Evaluates reasonableness of our intuitions, cultural beliefs, and the norms stored in our prototypes.