1. Framework for Regulation Presentation to the Qualifications Board August 2015

2. Outline of Presentation 1.Background 2.New Direction 3.Framework Committee 4.Development Process 5.Alignment with QB Documents 6.Current Status of the Elements 7.Key Roles for QB in Framework Development 2 of 33

3. Background 3 of X

4. Initiation of the Framework The Framework for Regulation (formerly the Canadian Framework for Licensure) was initiated by agreement of the Presidents at the Meeting of Members in Montreal on May 23, 2009 to “continue to explore, under the auspices of Engineers Canada, a national framework for licensure by requesting the CEO Group to develop a guideline for licensure, consistent with the requirements of the Agreement on Internal Trade.” The objective was to develop a compendium of model optimal practices to which each association could aspire. It was recognized that implementation would be the responsibility of each association, and that not all elements of the Framework would be adopted in all jurisdictions. 4 of 33

5. Original Development Process 1.Research: – by Engineers Canada staff. 2.Development: – review of research by CEO Group. 3.Consultation with CAs: – responses requested within 4 months. 4.Analysis: – synthesis of CA responses by Engineers Canada staff. 5.Approval: – sent to CAs for approval by Councils. 6.Endorsement: – by Engineers Canada Board 7.Implementation: – creation of implementation documentation by CEQB sub-committee. – publication on Engineers Canada website. 5 of 33

6. Issues with the Original Development Process Consultation by CAR could take six months or more for a response. Challenges in synthesizing the results of the constituent association consultations. When asked for input, CA councils might have insufficient information with which to consider a proposed element. Confusion around the role of QB in the development of implementation documents. Implementation of Framework elements is up to individual CAs. Framework is now covered by the Ends and is a CEO accountability. 6 of 33

7. Internal Review, March 2014 An internal review was conducted in March 2014, by Engineers Canada staff. The review proposed new objectives derived from previous experience, feedback from stakeholders and an analysis of overall requirements. These new objectives included: – Alignment with the Ends – Consideration of current and emerging challenges to the profession – A refresh of all elements to ensure standardization – A review of consultation at all levels during the development of elements – A method to monitor and review progress The new Framework committee was formed and met in November 2014 to review findings and proposed objectives of the internal review. 7 of 33

8. New Direction 8 of X

9. Purpose of the Framework To support the engineering regulators in their mandate to regulate the practice of engineering, license the members of the profession and to serve and protect the public interest by: capturing excellent national and international practices; responding to emerging trends and challenges; and facilitating fair practices that are accessible, timely, monitored, transparent, objective, impartial and just. 9 of 33

10. Vision The Framework is a set of aspirational elements that form the baseline for engineering regulators. 10 of 33 Constituent associations participate in the development of elements and decide if, when, and how to adopt elements of the Framework. Engineers Canada facilitates the development and ongoing improvement of the Framework. Roles

11. Framework Committee 11 of X

12. Framework Committee Kim Allen (Chair) Chief Executive Officer, Engineers Canada Ann English Chief Executive Officer and Registrar, APEGBC Mark Flint Chief Executive Officer, APEGA Andrew MacLeod Chief Executive Officer, APEGNB Gerard McDonald Registrar, PEO Dennis Paddock Executive Director and Registrar, APEGS 12 of 33

13. Committee Charges Provide advice and guidance on: 1.the Framework process; 2.identification and validation of Framework elements; 3.validation of assessment processes within the Framework; and 4.promotion of the Framework. 13 of 33

14. Development Process 14 of X

15. Streamlined Development Process The new streamlined development process provides for: accelerated development of all elements by Engineers Canada staff; an ongoing process of continuous feedback and improvement; – CAs are encouraged to suggest new elements or revisions to existing elements at any time; and – all suggestions, comments and input provided by CAs will be considered and responded to by Engineers Canada staff; 2 year timeline for completion of all elements. 15 of 33

16. Development and Consultation Process 1.Research and Drafting Research and initial drafting of Framework elements is done by Engineers Canada. 2.Expert Review Elements may be submitted to groups of subject matter experts for review. 3.Consultation with CA Staff Networks Input may be obtained from key user groups including the National Admissions Officials Group and the National Discipline and Enforcement Officials Group, as applicable. 16 of 33

17. Progress since May 2015 1.Finalization and prioritization of the list of current and proposed elements purpose statement developed for each element 2.Project plan and procedures developed procedure for obtaining expert advice developed 3.Alignment analysis of Framework elements and QB documents completed 4.11 existing elements revised, 9 new elements drafted 17 of 33

18. Alignment with QB Documents 18 of X

19. Alignment with QB Documents Goals: ensure that all Engineers Canada resources are consistent and integrated. leverage the excellent work done by QB already utilize expertise of QB members to inform development of future Framework elements 19 of 33

20. Alignment with QB Documents Overlap in areas of: Licensing / Admissions Continuing Professional Development Engineers-in-Training Practice of Professional Engineering Code of Ethics Good Character 20 of 33

21. Alignment with QB Documents Proposed solutions: Revisions to Framework elements – Licensing Requirements and Competencies – Continuing Professional Development Revisions to QB documents – Model Guide: Supervision of EITs – Good Character Guideline 21 of 33

22. Current Status 22 of X

23. Registration / Licensure Elements 23 of 33 Licensing Requirements and Competencies – EITsRevised Licensing Requirements and Competencies – Limited LicenceRevised Licensing Requirements and Competencies – Professional EngineersRevised Negotiating International Recognition AgreementsRevised Fairness in Registration PracticesRevised Authentication of Academic DocumentsDraft Canadian Experience RequirementDraft Competency AssessmentDraft Professionalism Assessment: Law, Ethics, Good CharacterDraft Supervision and Mobility of EITsDraft Assessment of Academic CredentialsProposed Assessment of Distance Education Transcripts Proposed Authentication of Professional Engineering DocumentsProposed IIDD Advancement CriteriaProposed Mobility & HarmonizationProposed Use of Technical ExaminationsProposed

24. Practice of the Profession Elements Code of Ethics Revised Definition of Practice of Professional EngineeringRevised Titles, Rights & ResponsibilitiesRevised Public Identification of Engineering ExpertiseRevised Accountability of OrganizationsRevised Continuing Professional DevelopmentRevised Membership Rights and Responsibilities Draft Fitness to PracticeDraft Standards of Professional Conduct / Code of ConductDraft Practice ReviewDraft Use of SealProposed Authentication of Documents Proposed Insurance Proposed Joint Practice Proposed Relationship to Other Professions Proposed 24 of 33

25. Discipline and Enforcement Elements Principles of Complaints, Investigation & DisciplineExisting Complaints & Investigation PracticesExisting Enforcement PracticesExisting Recognition of Extra-Provincial Disciplinary SanctionsProposed* Geographic Jurisdiction – DisciplineProposed* Discipline PracticesProposed* Sharing of Regulatory InformationProposed* Alternative Dispute ResolutionProposed Appeals of Regulatory DecisionsProposed Conduct of HearingsProposed Sentencing GuidelinesProposed *identified as high priority for development 25 of 33 To be drafted Oct - Nov 2015

26. Governance and Administration Elements Objects of the Engineering Regulators Existing Legislative Authorities Existing Information to be Included in the RegisterProposed* Advocacy Proposed* Governance of a Self-Regulating Body Proposed* Membership Status Proposed* Engineering Brand (Titles, Images & Words) Proposed* Awards & Scholarships Proposed Chapters / Branches Proposed Fee-Setting Power Proposed *identified as high priority for development 26 of 33 To be drafted Nov - Dec 2015

27. Key Roles for QB in Framework Development 27 of X

28. Expert Review Expert advice is not necessary for every element of the Framework for Regulation. A decision to obtain an expert review of a draft element may be made based on factors including: the controversial nature of the Framework element or difficulty obtaining support for the element from constituent associations; the need for specific expertise; the desire for a broad consultation process due to the fundamental nature of the Framework element; a request for expert review is made by the Framework Steering Committee. 28 of 33

29. Expert Review Engineers Canada will invite individuals to form panels of three experts. Experts may be sought from: – experts suggested by the constituent associations; – members of the QB and its subcommittees; – the Canadian Academy of Engineering; – experts who are not professional Engineers. Engineers Canada staff will submit the draft Framework element and supporting research to the expert panel, with a list of specific questions or issues Expert panel will meet via teleconference to provide input 29 of 33

30. Implementation Guidance Purpose of Implementation Guidance Implementation of an element of the Framework requires a level of detail not contained in the elements themselves. In some cases, there is a benefit to the development of more detailed implementation guidance to assist the Constituent Associations which chose to implement that particular element. 30 of 33

31. Implementation Guidance Factors in Favor of Implementation GuidanceFactors Against Implementation Guidance New or emerging issue Provincial associations have established, relatively consistent procedures and have not expressed any desire to change New regulatory practice or requirement Lack of widespread support for adoption of framework element Regulatory practice not currently in place in more than half of Constituent Associations Implementation requires revisions to legislation Complex implementation documents which can be developed in standard form and adopted Existence of detailed guidance from other Engineers Canada groups and/or Constituent Associations Expressed desire by Constituent Associations for guidance and/or standardized practices 31 of 33

32. Questions? 32 of 33

33. Engineers make a world of difference For more information contact Beth Deazeley beth.deazeley@engineerscanada.ca