1. Presentation to ADQ Implementation Workshop
Military Impacts
Presentation to ADQ Implementation Workshop
Jorge PEREIRA
Head of Civil-Military CNS Unit
EUROCONTROL DSS/CM
28th May 2013

2. Military Information Context
Command and Control requirements drive the
information context in military organisations
Military use specific data models and enablers
but also data exchanged with civil context
New ATM concepts and interoperability call
for enhanced information exchange/sharing

3. One Example

4. Civil-Military Studies
Study on SWIM Civil-Military Interoperability
HELIOS, UvE, Object Security
Information Exchange Requirements identified

5. Civil-Military Information Exchange Requirements (1)5
C2/AD – Command and Control/Air Defence
OAT – Operational Air Traffic

6. Civil-Military Information Exchange Requirements (2)
IER NM
Civil ATC
Mil ATC
Mil C2/AD
WOC
Civ. a/c
Mil a/c
Aeronautical Information X
ASM co-ordination data
Meteorology data
Initial Flight Plan (GAT)
Current Flight Plan (GAT)
Initial Flight Plan (OAT)
Flight Data (Inter-Centre Coord.)
Flight Object
Flow and Capacity Management
Primary Radar data
SSR Aircraft Identification
Trajectory data (SBT)
Trajectory data (SMT)
Trajectory data (RBT/RMT)
Inter-Centre Voice
Air-ground Voice
Air-air Voice
Controller-Pilot Data Link
Initial 4D data
Full 4D data
ACAS and GPWS data
Emergency data
Navigation data
Approach and Landing data
Terrain data
Safety (STCA) Warnings

7. Civil-Military Information Context Target

8. Regulations ERs Single European Sky Community Specifications
Civil-Military Coordination is a SES Essential Requirement
Community Specifications
Implementing
Rules
ERs
Common declaration on military issues related to the Single European Sky in EC 549/2004
Military-related provisions included in multiple IRs
Aeronautical Data Quality I contains references to military (recital)

9. Commission Regulation (EU) 73/2010 (ADQ) “Recital approach”
Reminder on Military regulatory coverage in ADQ:
SES regulations do not cover military operations and training
recognised that military organisations provide AI for use in GAT operations and are essential part of the aeronautical data process
two recitals were defined in the IR
no regulatory provisions (articles) directly allocated to military stakeholders
member States will have to take appropriate action to ensure the quality of AI is sufficient to meet its intended use.
Being aware that military have their own data policies !

10. ADQ 2 discussions triggered conclusions also valid in ADQ 1
Military play a key role as aeronautical data originators and data users
ADQ may impact elements of the ‘downstream’ (‘and upstream’) aeronautical data chain serviced or exploited by military
Military should need to meet similar ADQ requirements when military organisations supply and/or use aeronautical data for IFR/GAT
Lack of a strict legal applicability of SES on military means that it is not clear to what extent ADQ objectives would be achieved by military stakeholders.

11. It seems obvious that ADQ will have to be considered !
Despite the lack of regulatory coverage, the military will be impacted by Aeronautical Data Quality Requirements !
The objectives of the HMAI Project are to extend the data harmonisation to military Aeronautical Information and to increase military awareness on the needs and benefits for complete and harmonised data sets. In addition the project will aim to identify exactly the military AIS situation in Europe as well as to support the Military Data Providers in their migration activities to the EAD.
It seems obvious that ADQ will have to be considered !

12. MILITARY OPERATIONS INTEGRATED ON THE BASIS OF INTEROPERABILITY
Despite the lack of regulatory coverage, the military will be impacted by Aeronautical Data Quality Requirements !
new concepts
MILITARY OPERATIONS INTEGRATED ON THE BASIS OF INTEROPERABILITY

13. “As civil as possible as military as required !”
Thank You ! 13