1. CIVIL/MILITARY WORKSHOP FABCE ASM/ATFCM process Validation Plan Stjepan Varga Brussels, 20.09.2012

2. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Step approach Distinction of ASM/ATFCM process and organisational enablers GO/NO GO to move next step Starting from national ASM/ATFCM integration process Regional ASM/ATFCM process final goal Organisational solution to be evaluated in due time Timeframe to consider 2012-2015 for realistic implementation Changes subject to validation before GO/NO GO decision.

3. 3 ATFCM/ASM Functional Models Model A - Optimizing the current situation Role: Existing roles continue with additional FABCE Network management Model B - Optimizing the current situation, applying LEAD AMC Role: Existing roles continue with additional LAED AMC to support FABCE ASM management Model C - FABCE ATFCM coordination function, and national ASM Role: A FABCE Network ATFCM Centre Model D - FABCE ASM coordination function, and national ATFCM Role: FABCE Network ASM Centre Model E - FABCE ATFCM/ASM coordination function Role: FABCE Network Operations Centre

4. 4

5. High Level Objectives Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination procedures at national level; Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination procedures at FAB level using national Structures Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination procedures at FAB level using Lead AMC Concept Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination procedures between national structure/Lead AMCs and NM Assess usability of different ASM planning and coordination tools, which could be applied in FAB CE operational environment;

6. HU SK BiH HR SL AT CZ CZ YES – FL or Areas AT YES – FL or Areas SK YES – FL or Areas HU YES – FL or Areas SL YES – FL or Areas HR YES – FL or Areas BiH NO Geographical Scope

7. Procedures - Scope D-7/D-2 D-1 AUP

8. FABCE – Potential Traffic on Night Segments if available H24 Traffic sample for Friday 14/10/2011 Numbers show flights on segment for the period 0500-2300

9. NM AA FP AMC FMP MODEL A FAB AD

10. Live trial positive feedback –Communication –Coordination among actors –Harmonisation of UQ 863 publication –FAB CE administrator –Rotation principle for FAB CE administrator –General Systems support feasible

11. Live trial issues Procedures –Respect timeline for uploading and publication –Respect of sequence of tasks –Confusion for weekend consolidation –Confusion for contingency procedure application (different procedures?) –Missed network coordination NOP Publications –Status publish for national files (FMP) –Wrong information in files –Wrong templates –Confusion for D-2/6 files –Inconsistency of information (FAB AUP vs EAUP) Systems –LARA connection – internet –NOP connection

12. 12

13. NM AA FP AMC FMP FATFCM MODEL C

14. NM AA FP AMC FMP FASM MODEL D

15. AA FP AMC FMP NM MODEL E FATFCM FASM

16. High Level Objectives Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination procedures at FAB level using FAB ATFCM coordinator Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination procedures at FAB level using FAB ASM coordinator Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination procedures at FAB level using FAB ASM/ATFCM coordinator Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination procedures between FAB ASM/ATFCM coordinator and NM

17. Operational scenario CDRs cross borders CDR synchronisation CBAs ATFM scenarios –Alignment sector configurations/opening schemes –Alignment ATFM measures Level capping Re-routings

18. RTS Technical Layout Predict, NOP LARA, CIAM NOP Predict, SIMEX, NOP LARA, CIAM NOP Predict, NOP LARA, CIAM NOP Predict, NOP LARA, CIAM NOP Predict, NOP LARA, CIAM NOP Predict, NOP LARA, CIAM NOP Predict, NOP LARA, CIAM NOP Predict, NOP LARA, CIAM NOP Predict, SIMEX, NOP LARA, CIAM NOP