1. AYP/SINA/DINA Iowa Statewide Data Conference Tom Deeter IDOE Bureau of Information & Analysis Geri McMahon IDOE Bureau of School Improvement August 10, 2015

2. AYP Review Target – 100 %, since 2013-14. Reading Comprehension, Mathematics Participation, Performance Other Academic Indicators: Attendance, Graduation Rate Progression: Watch, SINA, Delay, Removed

3. Steps in Meeting AYP 1.Meet the Target (within Confidence Interval, CI) 2.Safe Harbor – reduce % of non-proficient students by 10% 3.Biennium Data – Uniform Averaging – data for past 2 years, CI 4.Triennium Data – Uniform Averaging – data for past 3 years, CI Add in the students meeting growth (approved growth model) Repeat Steps 1-4

4. Safe Harbor Given: 70% Proficient last year that means 30% are not proficient Reduction of non proficient by 10% = 30 x.10 = 3% Add the 3% to 70 To meet Safe Harbor, you have to reach 73% proficient this year

5. Exceptions to 2015 AYP Decisions Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Field Test schools. Used 12-13 data as “prior year data” to evaluate Safe Harbor Dynamic Learning Maps alternate assessment consortium. Proficiency data not available Used DLM students for Participation only, not Proficiency

6. 2015 AYP Determinations 338 Districts, 1336 Schools Met Participation Rates: 100% Districts, 99% schools Met Other Academic Indicators: 99.7% Districts, 98.5% Schools

7. 2015 AYP Determinations Mathematics Proficiency Districts – 70.7 % Met, 29.3 % Missed, 9.2 % DINA Schools – 33.5 % Met, 66.5 % Missed, 40.9 % SINA Reading Proficiency Districts – 64.2 % Met, 35.8 % Missed, 11 % DINA Schools – 29.8 % Met, 70.2 % Missed, 48.2 % SINA

8. 2015 AYP Determinations Summary DistrictsSchools Missed both R & M Proficiency (includes DINA/SINA, Watch) 19.5 %53.6 % Met both R & M Proficiency (includes Delay, Met, Removed) 54.4 %16.8 % Missed for R or M Proficiency 26.0 %29.6 % Total Missed for Something (includes one or both subjects) 45.6 %83.2 %

9. FY13 Actual - $83,471,134 FY14 Actual - $84,975,853 FY15 Actual - $91,258,673 The state can set aside up to 4% of the Title I allocation for SINA allocations District allocations – https://www.educateiowa.gov/documents/no-child- left-behind/2015/08/2015-2016-title-i-allocations Title I Allocation

10. 12-13 School year SINA set aside $3,369,881 Number of SINA schools188 Average SINA allocation$19,625 13-14 School year SINA set aside $3,338,845 Number of SINA schools251 Average SINA allocation$14,447 14-15 School year SINA set aside $3,399,034 Number of SINA schools310 Average SINA allocation$11,020 15-16 School year SINA set aside $3,650,347 Number of SINA schools? Average SINA allocation? SINA Allocations

11. ttps://www.educateiowa.gov/pk-12/no-child-left- behind/schools-and-districts-need-assistance- sinadina/guidance-schools-and ttps://www.educateiowa.gov/pk-12/no-child-left- behind/schools-and-districts-need-assistance- sinadina/guidance-schools-and SINA/DINA Timelines C-Plan link for Building SINA Plans Parent Notification Letters Corrective Action Guidance Restructuring Guidance School Choice and Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Information Guidance for SINA/DINA

12. Professional Developments Set Asides Requirements SINA 1 and 2- must set aside and spend 10% the building allocation for professional development DINA 1 and 2- must set aside and spend 10% of the district Title I allocation for professional development This set aside is budgeted in the Title I General Budget

13. SINA 1 -20% of the district allocation for Choice: ALL SINA 2 and above- 20% of the district allocation for Choice & Supplemental Education Services (SES) The Notification of Unexpended Funds form must be submitted to release the required 20% for use in other areas. This form is available after April 1 st. School Choice & SES Set-Aside (budgeted on the General Title I Budget)

14. Eligibility ALL students of SINA schools Priority is given to the lowest achieving, low income students Eligible Schools that can receive students Higher academic achievement No SINA Must offer more than one choice if available Choice: ALL SINA Schools

15. Length of Time for Choice Until graduated from choice school What if no schools are available? Parents must still be notified of SINA status Parents must be notified that no choices are available Choice: ALL SINA Schools

16. An LEA’s notice to parents: Available ONLY to “poverty children” Explain how parents can obtain SES for their child Include the SEA list of approved providers within the LEA or its geographical location, including on-line providers Describe briefly the services, qualifications and evidence of effectiveness for each provider SES Notification: SINA 2 +

17. Indicate providers that are able to serve students with disabilities or LEP students Include an explanation of the benefits of receiving SES Application procedures Explain how the LEA will notify parents about enrollment dates and start dates Fair and equitable procedures for serving students if not all students can be served Identify the District contact person Districts-Enter into agreement with provider NO District contract with only one provider District should not show preferential treatment for any one provider SES Notification: SINA 2 + cont’

18. SINA Plans and Budgets Both due November 1 Submit plan through C-Plan on the Iowa Education Portal: https://portal.ed.iowa.gov/iowalandingpage/Landing.aspx Submit each building’s SINA budget through the Title I Application

19. Upcoming technical assistance in regard to your SINA plan August 27 webinar3:00-4:30 September 16webinar9:00-10:30 and 3:00-4:30 October 13Symposium9:00-4:30

20. Accountability Amendments Submitted to USED 1.3 items on DLM (FAY definition, use in AYP, use in growth) 2.Definition of a “new school” for SINA purposes (consolidations) 3.6 and 7 year graduation rates 4.ADA fixed target at 95%.

21. Contact Information Tom.Deeter@iowa.gov 515-979-5854 Geri.McMahon@iowa.gov 515-281-3944