1. BMPs for Aquaculture Production Lori Marsh, Associate Professor, Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech September 19, 2005

2. Aquatic Animal Production (CAAP/AAP) Systems: Flow-through Recirculating Net pen and cages Ponds Lobster pounds, Crawfish, Shellfish, Aquariums, and Alligators

3. Flow-through Systems Constantly flowing culture water Commonly use raceways or tanks Found throughout US Require consistent volume of water Most use well, spring or stream water as source Primary method to grow salmonid species such as rainbow trout.

4. Recirculating Systems Highly intensive culture Actively filter and reuse water Water treatment including –Ammonia removal –Solids removal –Oxygenation –Temperature control…. Capital intensive at startup

8. Net Pens and Cages Suspended or floating holding systems Located along a shoreline or pier or anchored off shore Rely on natural water movement to assure water exchange/quality for fish

9. What’s the Problem with CAAPs? 4,200 commercial facilities (1998 USDA census) Water quality concerns include –Suspended solids, P, NH 3, BOD –Drugs (e.g. oxytetracycline or formalin) –Chemicals (e.g. copper-containing pesticides) –Pathogens (primarily a concern for native biota)

10. BMPs for Feed Management Applicable to all systems Avoid overfeeding Match feeding to feed requirements Direct feed to fish Use quality feed, and store to reserve nutrient quality Handle feed to minimize fines Active feed monitoring (net pens): detects when feed pellets are passing below fish.

11. BMP for Removal of Solids in a Flow-through System Quiescent Zones typically constructed with wire mesh to exclude fish from last 10% of raceway. Designed to insure that overflow rate is smaller than particle settling velocity. Solids typically removed by suction through a vacuum head.

12. Other BMPs for Solids Removal Sedimentation basins –Off-line settling (OLS) basins receive water and solids slurry from Quiescent Zone (QZ). Note: QZ + OLS are most common settling system for flow- through systems. –Full-flow settling (FFS) systems stand alone and collect water flow from entire facility (need 2 operating in parallel for solids removal). Secondary Settling – Microscreens –Vegetated ditches –Constructed wetlands

13. Solids Disposal Dewatering –Natural evaporation –Mechanical assistance Filtration Squeezing Capillary action Vacuum withdrawal Centrifugal –Chemicals are often added to assist with the dewatering process

14. Solids Composting Dewatered sludge mixed with bulking agent to add carbon, reduce moisture, increase aeration Must be aerated (turned or by adding air) Often screened to remove bulking agent –Advantages: reduces volume, stabilizes material, heating destroys pathogens, value added product

15. Vermicomposting of solids Vermicomposting uses earthworms to transform organic wastes and results in two saleable products: vermicompost and worms. VERMICOMPOST WORMS

16. WHY CONSIDER VERMICOMPOSTING? Two saleable products Possibility of worms as fish feed Worm composting faster than microbial Worms turn the material so machines/people don’t have to Vermicomposting suitable for high- moisture waste

17. After settling, the contents were run through a hydroclone. HYDROCLONE

18. The bins in operation WORM BINS

19. Material from beds was run through a trommel screen resulting in screened material, unscreened compost, and worms. WORM SEPARATOR

20. Processing rate very slow during extreme temperature conditions >29 C or < 10 C; therefore an unconditioned greenhouse does not appear suitable for this process. During more optimum temperature conditions, worms processed 2.3 kg dry sludge/m 2 -week. For the estimated sludge production at BRA, a 30.5 m x 91.5 m (100’x300’) structure would be required to house sufficient worm beds. CONCLUSIONS

21. Land Application of Solids Can land apply without dewatering –Hydraulic limitations not nutrient Need provisions for times of frozen ground BMPs for land application of animal wastes would apply, e.g. site conditions, weather, crop nutrient uptake, application rates, land availability, setbacks, slopes, neighbors, etc.

22. Waste Treatment Options for Effluent POTW Lagoons: BMPs for lagoons apply, e.g. site selection, design, start up, maintenance, record keeping, clean water diversion, etc.

23. Mortality Management Avoid disease outbreaks Inspect daily, remove mortality promptly Proper disposal—composting, rendering

24. BMPs for Ponds Avoid discharges e.g. seine harvest rather than draining; maintain freeboard for storm volume, drain from top when necessary. Implement erosion control for pond ( protection from waves, aerators, vehicles, etc.) and watershed. Manage rainwater: divert excess runoff, Maintain good vegetation and avoid livestock production in watershed. Use drugs and chemicals only as needed, use only FDA- and EPA-approved water quality enhancers and follow label directions carefully.

25. Constituents of concern Nutrients Bacteria (?) –Carr, O.J. and R. Goulder. 1993. Directly counted bacteria in a trout farm and its effluent. Aquacult. Fish. Manage. Vol 24, no. 1, pp. 19-27. Pharmaceuticals (?) –Halling-Sorensen, B. et al. 1998. Occurrence, fate and effects of pharmaceutical substances in the environment—A review. Chemosphere. Vol 36, no.2, pp. 357-393. Jan. (Nice abstract. Unfortunately, article is in German.)

26. References Claude E. Boyd. Guidelines for aquaculture effluent management at the farm-level. Aquaculture. Vol 226 Issues 1- 4, Oct. 2003. pp 101-112. USEPA. BMPs for CAAP Facilities. www.epa.gov/guide/aquaculture.