Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byWilla Black Modified over 9 years ago
1
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska “Problems and Priorities in Pretesting Pondered” Beth Noeller Grady Barnhill Carol O’Byrne
2
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska
3
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska All Items are not Created Equal
4
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska Purposes of Pretesting Gather performance information Add new content
5
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska What Information do you Gather? Performance data ♦Classical and IRT ♦Difficulty ♦Discrimination Cognitive Level Data Content
6
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska Difficulty How hard is the item? Usually expressed as a %. What percent of the candidates get the item correct? IRT b-value
7
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska What is a “good” difficulty? What is your cut score? The best difficulty is right around the cut score. Too easy and too hard provide little information. Between 40 & 90 for many testing programs
8
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska Discrimination How well an item differentiates between those who perform well on the test and those who get the item correct. Correlation Values from -1.0 to +1.0 IRT a-value
9
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska Positive Discrimination Values Two people walking together ‘in step’ Get an item correct and receive a high score on the examination Perfect positive relationship +1.0 Item correctness exam score
10
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska Negative Discrimination Values Two people walking in opposite directions Get an item correct and receive a low score on the examination Perfect negative relationship -1.0 Item correctness exam score
11
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska What is a “good” discrimination? A positive relationship The higher the better Diversity of the candidate population Greater than 0.15 exam score Item correctness
12
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska Combining Difficulty and Disc. Each quality by itself is linear Together they can be depicted on a two- dimensional graph
13
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska
14
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska
15
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska
16
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska
17
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska
18
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska
19
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska
20
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska
21
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska
22
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska
23
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska
24
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska
25
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska
26
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska
27
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska
28
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska
29
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska
30
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska Summary
31
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska How do you use pretesting to add new content? Get the pulse of your item bank Inventory of acceptable scored items Inventory of unused items
32
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska Scored Items and Test Specs
33
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska Pretest Needs
34
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska Beth’s Contact Information Beth Noeller, PhD 319-339-3095 beth.noeller@act.org
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.