Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Objectivity & Subjectivity

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Objectivity & Subjectivity"— Presentation transcript:

1 Objectivity & Subjectivity

2 Value freedom v Value relevance
Value freedom is the idea that all bias should be eliminated from research Only then can it be seen as objective But values are complex and can effect what a researcher chooses to study This is value relevance The theoretical perspective adopted by the sociologist has values and assumptions that may influence the purpose of the research Relate this to Ann Oakley’s work

3 Durkheim v Weber Positivism v Interpretivism
Sociology should study observable phenonema Relationships between social facts should be measured Social inquiry is no different from natural scientific inquiry Quantitative methods should be used to acquire objective data The validity and reliability of this data should stand up to scrutiny Sociology involves the understanding of social action No value judgements should be made as to whether the actions are good or bad Sociologists should interpret action from a value-laden perspective Different concepts would be formed because of pre-existing values Once a concept is generated, objectivity is possible

4 Values in the research Process
Objectivity can be difficult to achieve as values can enter the research process at different stages Choosing a topic Obtaining funding Choosing a method Selecting questions Recording responses Interpreting findings Selecting findings to use in report Deciding what the research will be used for

5 Therefore, is Sociological research a subjective process?
Modern Interpretivists would argue that sociology cannot be objective or value free People are social actors and have subjective motivations And make sense of the world through interpretations of meanings Society is the product of everyday social interaction Qualitative methods allow insight into meanings and motives

6 Howard S Becker Becker believed that it was impossible to carry out research that is uncontaminated by personal and political beliefs We can never avoid taking sides because behaviour should be analysed from the viewpoint of those being studied However it is crucial that sympathies should not render the research invalid Therefore the limitations of the research should be clearly stated

7 Political Alignment Much Sociological theory can be placed on a spectrum from left to right The political nature of some theories means that they cannot be value free Marxism and feminism can be described as committed Sociology where Sociology cannot be neutral Their theories and research aims to bring about social change and therefore can be seen as politicised

8 Political Aims Because feminists are committed to social change for women, they may misinterpret women’s real experiences to fit in with their political aims They may impose on women their value of liberation By focusing on the oppressed group, they fail to reveal the standpoint of the oppressors This bias cannot be seen as value-free However feminists make no such claim

9 Social Constructionism
Social Constructionists suggest that Sociologists should question concepts and categories that people use to understand the social world They are critical of “taken for granted” knowledge Concepts and categories are relative to specific historical times and cultures Knowledge is not the product of objective observation but is socially constructed through discourse (Burr 1995)

10 Social constructionism and Subjectivity
This theory indicates that sociology cannot be value-free It is bound up with particular discourses and values There can be no objective truth because truth varies with historical and cultural context This makes research problematic If all knowledge is relative, how can one piece of research be more objective than another? Postmodernists don’t think it can

11 Conclusion Gomm (2004) argues that sociology cannot avoid values as society is made up of values Sociologists are members of society and they cannot avoid the influence of their cultural beliefs on their work Gouldner (1962) describes “value-free Sociology as a myth” as research is influenced by “domain assumptions” Domain assumptions are basic assumptions about social life and the nature of society Sociologists therefore need to bring their assumptions and values into the open so that others are aware of possible bias This is an issue of integrity if research findings are to be used in policy making and fed back into cultural beliefs

12 Summary Questions What is the difference between value freedom and value relevance ? Outline views that suggest that Sociology cannot be value – free Why would Postmodernists believe that research cannot be objective?


Download ppt "Objectivity & Subjectivity"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google