Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAmy Walton Modified over 9 years ago
1
PPAR activation Clinical evidence
2
Evolution of clinical evidence supporting PPAR activation 20002005 and beyond Surrogate outcomes studies Large observational studies Ongoing clinical outcomes studies Endothelial function Carotid atherosclerosis Restenosis Mortality in patients with diabetes + HF or AMI Onset of diabetes in patients with IFG
3
Anticipated results from large multicenter trials in (pre)diabetes 2005200620072008 2009 PROactive DREAM CHICAGO ADOPT APPROACH ACCORD BARI-2D ORIGIN Clinical outcomes Surrogate outcomes NAVIGATOR VADT RECORD ACT-NOW PERISCOPE
4
Dormandy JA et al. Lancet. 2005;366:1279-89. PROactive: Study Design Pioglitazone 15 mg qd titrated to 45 mg qd Randomized, double-blind controlled trial N = 5238 with type 2 diabetes and macrovascular disease Primary outcome: Composite of all-cause mortality, MI (including silent MI), ACS, stroke, revascularization, leg amputation Secondary outcome: All-cause mortality, MI (excluding silent MI), stroke PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events Mean follow-up: 34.5 months Placebo
5
PROactive Baseline Characteristics Male (%) Caucasian (%) Age (yrs) BMI (kg/m 2 ) Waist circ. (cm) Current smoker (%) Ex smoker (%) Systolic BP (mm/Hg) Diastolic BP (mm/Hg) Pioglitazone Placebo 66.6 65.6 98.4 98.7 61.9 61.6 30.7 31.0 104.9 105.5 13.1 14.5 46.0 44.0 143.5 143.3 82.8 83.2 Dormandy JA et al. Lancet. 2005;366:1279-89.
6
PROactive CV history at baseline Dormandy JA et al. Lancet. 2005;366:1279-89. Pioglitazone n = 2605 Placebo n = 2633 MI4746 Stroke19 PCI or CABG31 Acute coronary syndromes14 Coronary artery disease48 Peripheral arterial disease1920 History of hypertension7576 ≥2 macrovascular disease criteria4749 %
7
PROactive CV medications at baseline Dormandy JA et al. Lancet. 2005;366:1279-89. Pioglitazone n = 2605 Placebo n = 2633 -blockers 5554 ACEIs63 ARBs 7 7 CCBs3437 Nitrates3940 Thiazide diuretics1516 Antiplatelets8583 Aspirin7572 Statins43 Fibrates1011 %
8
Time from Randomization (months) N at Risk: HR95% CIp value pioglitazone vs placebo 0.9040.802 - 1.018 0.0951 N events: 3-year estimate: placebo 572 / 263323.5% pioglitazone 514 / 260521.0% Time to primary composite endpoint Kaplan-Meier event rate 061218243036 523850184786461944334268693(228) 0.0 0.05 0.10 0.25 0.15 0.20 Dormandy JA et al., Lancet (2005) 366:1279 - 1289
9
Time from Randomization (months) N at Risk: HR95% CIp value pioglitazone vs placebo 0.8410.722 - 0.981 0.0273 * N events: 3-year estimate: placebo 358 / 263314.4% pioglitazone 301 / 260512.3% Significant reduction in secondary outcome Kaplan-Meier event rate 061218243036 523851024991487747524651786(256) 0.0 0.05 0.10 0.15 Dormandy JA et al., Lancet (2005) 366:1279 - 1289
10
Time from Randomization (months) N at Risk: HR95% CIp value pioglitazone vs placebo 0.8280.717- 0.956 0.01 * N events: 3-year estimate: placebo 409 / 263316.5% pioglitazone 339 / 260513.8% Time to all-cause death, non-fatal MI, stroke or ACS Kaplan-Meier event rate 061218243036 523850804947481646844564765(248) 0.0 0.05 0.10 0.20 0.15 Dormandy JA et al., Lancet (2005) 366:1279 - 1289
11
placebo pioglitazone N events: 3-year estimate: 362/1737 183/1741 22,0% 11,1% Kaplan Meier event rate of progression to permanent insulin use HR 95% CI p value pioglitazone vs palcebo 0.469 0.39-0.56 <0.0001 Time from Randomization (months) N at risk: 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 3478 33463198307529552824446(137) Time to permanent insulin use Dormandy JA et al. Lancet. 2005;366:1279-89.
12
PROactive Subgroup analysis – Previous MI Pioglitazone reduced risk of CV events, including: – Fatal/nonfatal MI* by 28% (P = 0.045) – ACS by 37% (P = 0.035) Over 3 years, pioglitazone added to medication in 1000 patients could prevent: – 22 recurrent MIs – 23 ACS events Future studies are needed to further elucidate the underlying mechanism(s) of these clinical results Adapted from Erdmann E. AHA 2005. www.PROactive-results.com. *Excluding silent MI n = 2445 with previous MI (≥6 mo)
13
PROactive Subgroup analysis – Previous stroke Wilcox RG. World Congress of Cardiology 2006; September 3, 2006; Barcelona, Spain. End pointPioglitazone n=486 Placebo n=498 Hazard ratio (95% CI) p Recurrent stroke 27510.53 (0.34 – 0.94) 0.008 Fatal and nonfatal stroke with pioglitazone treatment vs placebo in patients with prior history of stroke
14
PROactive HF hospitalization and mortality Pioglitazone n (%) Placebo n (%)P HF leading to hospital admission* Fatal HF 149 (5.7) 25 (0.96) 108 (4.1) 22 (0.84) 0.007 NS Dormandy JA et al. Lancet. 2005;366:1279-89. * Non-adjudicated
15
TZDs associated with lower mortality Masoudi FA et al. Circulation. 2005;111:583-90. N = 16,417 Medicare patients with diabetes and HF (1998–1999, 2000–2001) Follow-up (days) Proportion of patients surviving 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 0 50100300150200250 0.9 0 350 13% RRR HR 0.87 (0.80–0.94) No insulin sensitizer (n = 12,069) Thiazolidinedione (n = 2226)
16
Summary Pioglitazone treatment compared to placebo in high risk patients with type 2 diabetes: 10% trend of relative risk reduction in the primary endpoint 16% significant relative risk reduction in the main secondary endpoint (all-cause death, MI, or stroke) Significant relative risk reductions of other MACE endpoints: – All-cause death, MI, stroke, or ACS – 17% – CV death, MI, or stroke – 18% – CV death, MI, stroke, or ACS – 20% – Fatal or non-fatal MI – 22%
17
PROactive in perspective Pioglitazone appears to reduce risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with advanced type 2 diabetes – in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events (prior stroke, MI, PCI or CABG) – on top of good standard of care – relatively short-term study PROactive results support use of PPAR modulator in patients with diabetes at high CVD risk May improve CVD outcomes and decrease need to start insulin
18
PROactive vs landmark clinical trials: Comparative benefit in patients with diabetes MI, stroke, CV death (%) Lancet 2003;361:2005-2016; Circulation 1998;98:2513-2519; Lancet 2000;355:253-259; Lancet 2005; 366:1279 - 1289
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.