1. Sarah Hadyniak and Kathy Fein I cannot live without books. ~Thomas Jefferson

2. Description of Topic  We wanted to research the top two bookstores (Borders and Barnes & Noble) to see the differences in people who frequented these stores as well as the differences of sections visited in both stores.  Additionally we wanted to see the differences in the companies based upon their stocks to see the national attitude towards each store.

3. Background  There are over 29,000 bookstores in the US  Borders owns/operates 511 Borders superstores plus 175 Waldenbooks stores  Barnes and Noble owns/operates 717 bookstores plus 637 college bookstores  February 16, 2011: Borders announced that it had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection  Also announced the liquidation/closing of 226 stores

4. Our Project  We decided to go to two different bookstores to observe customers  Kathy went to Borders  Sarah went to Barnes and Noble  We recorded the following about each subject:  Section they were looking in  Gender  Age Group (young, adult, senior)  If they bought a book  If they were alone

5. Section Preference Our data indicates that members of each gender do not visit each section in equal proportions. We will test this later with a chi² test.

6. Is there a relationship between gender and preference of section? Frequency Section of Bookstore in which Subject was Observed The most males (20) were found in Sci-Fi, while the least males (0) were found in Romance. The most females (18) were found in Literature, while the least females (2) were found in Biography. This distribution contributes to our prediction that we will find evidence of an association between gender and section.

7. Based on our data, the population of females visiting bookstores as a whole prefer literature the most, while males prefer sci-fi. Females least prefer biography while males least prefer romance when shopping or browsing for books. Is there a relationship between gender and preference of section? Library of Congress (not technically a bookstore, but still REALLY cool)

8. χ²-Test for Independence: Gender and Preference of Section Ho: Gender and preference of section are independent Ha: Gender and preference of section are not independent Conditions: 1.Categorical Data 2.SRS 3.Each count is greater than or equal to 5 Gender and Section are categorical data Subjects were randomly recorded at different days and times, so it is assumed to be representative Eliminating Biography, Mystery, and Romance, all expected counts are greater or equal to 5.

9. ObservedHistoryLiteratureReligionSci-FiSelf-Help Females9186118 Males14 6208 ExpectedHistoryLiteratureReligionSci-FiSelf-Help Females10.49114.5965.473714.147.2982 Males12.50917.4046.526316.868.7018 χ²-Test for Independence: Gender and Preference of Section Conditions met, use χ²-distribution, do χ²-test for independence

10. χ²-Test for Independence: Gender and Preference of Section P( χ² >3.3484) =.5013 We fail to reject our Ho because the p-value of.5013 is greater than α=.05. We have sufficient evidence that gender and preference of section (excluding romance, biography, and mystery) are independent. Degrees Freedom = 4

11. Distribution of Age Groups at Different Bookstores Young (child to 20) Adult (20 to 70ish) Senior (70ish and up) 25% 60.9% 14.1% Barnes and Noble Borders Young (child to 20) Adult (20 to 70ish) Senior (70ish and up) 26.7% 73.3% Adults make up the largest portion of people who visit bookstores, but compared to the other two categories, “adult” encompasses the most ages and therefore the most people Based on our data, more seniors visit Barnes and Noble than Borders

12. χ²-Test for Independence: Age Group and Store Choice OBSERVEDYoungAdult Borders1233 Barnes and Noble 2356 EXPECTEDYoungAdult Borders12.70232.298 Barnes and Noble 22.29856.702 Conditions: 1.Categorical Data 2.SRS 3.Each count is greater than or equal to 5 Age group and store are categorical data Subjects were randomly recorded at different days and times, so it is assumed to be representative Eliminating the seniors, all expected counts are greater or equal to 5. Ho: Age group and store choice are independent Ha: Age group and store choice are not independent Conditions met, use χ²-distribution, do χ²-test for independence

13. χ²-Test for Independence: Age Group and Store Choice P( χ² >.0848) =.7710 We fail to reject our Ho because the p-value of.7710 is greater than α=.05. We have sufficient evidence that age group and store choice are independent. Degrees Freedom = 1

14. Comparing Stock Prices of Borders and Barnes and Noble  We decided to compare prices from 2005 because we wanted to eliminate the lurking variable of Borders’ recent financial troubles  We assigned the days of the year from 1-365 and randomly generated 30 numbers using a calculator  We recorded the stock prices of each company for each day and ran a paired t-test All stock prices recorded in US Dollars

15. Stock Prices from 30 Days (Borders) 21.02, 20.53, 23.71, 23.16, 21.28, 25.27, 22.62, 25.39, 26.92, 21.17, 25.42, 25.24, 21.02, 21.14, 19.63, 23.07, 24.95, 20.14, 26.62, 20.59, 24.19, 20.39, 22.71, 25.80, 23.01, 24.39, 25.00, 24.88, 27.14, 26.20

16. Stock Prices from 30 Days (Barnes and Noble) 41.41, 40.47, 40.97, 38.39, 36.99, 36.05, 37.22, 40.76, 33.92, 36.68, 33.29, 35.73, 41.64, 41.97, 38.35, 37.70, 37.57, 34.49, 38.33, 35.60, 40.34, 36.81, 34.56, 39.46, 41.88, 37.16, 38.05, 34.64, 38.19, 36.16

17. Comparing Stock Prices of Borders and Barnes and Noble The histogram of the differences of the Borders and Barnes and Noble stock prices is unimodal, somewhat symmetric, and has a median of $14.615. It ranges from $7 to $20.83. There are two gaps and no points that look like outliers. Looking at this histogram, there appears to be a significant average difference between the stock prices of the two stores. If there was no difference, the histogram would be only one bar at zero.

18. μ d = mean of the difference of Barnes & Noble - Borders Conditions: 1.Paired data 2.SRS 3.Normal population of differences or n d ≥30 4.Population of differences ≥ 10*n d 1.Data points paired by date 2.Dates picked through random number generator (1,365) in 2005 3.n d ≥30 4.More than 300 days of stocks Ho: μ d = 0 Ha: μ d > 0 Conditions met, use Student’s t-distribution, do 1-sample paired t-test

19. We reject our Ho because our p-value of 1.931 x 10 -19 is less than the alpha of 0.05. We have sufficient evidence that the mean of the differences between Barnes & Noble and Borders is not equal to zero. This indicates that the stock prices of the two companies were not equal over the span of 2005. P(t > 21.0932) = 1.931 x 10 -19 Degrees Freedom = 29 = 21.0932

20. Bias and Error  Observation of all sections is difficult for one person and therefore some subjects may have been overlooked  Approximations of ages is difficult  Borders rearranged the store and caused difficulties for us and for costumers  Double counting subjects who browse many sections  We recorded if subjects browsed or bought, but the error in recording and determining that became too difficult to use  Because no men were observed in Romance, we could not include it in the tests. However, including it would have made finding an association between gender and section more likely.

21. Conclusions about the Population  Excluding certain sections and age groups, we can conclude that the population of individuals that frequent both stores are independent of age and of store choice. We also can conclude that gender and preference of section are independent as well.  We can conclude based on our paired test on the stock prices that the mean of the differences for both companies’ stock is not equal to zero, showing that Barnes and Noble’s prices are higher on average.

22. Personal Opinions  The layout change in Borders caused problems with data collection and led to many of our expected counts being lower than five  Although we did not statistically prove it, we believe that Borders was much better before they reorganized  Barnes & Noble’s organization system is more fluid than Borders, so people tended to drift from section to section more so than in Borders.

23. We Continue being Highly Opinionated  Although we could not use the senior age group category, a larger proportion of older individuals went to Barnes & Noble over Borders, perhaps because of either the accessibility or preference because Barnes & Noble is an older store.  The location of Valley Square appeals to younger individuals, and therefore the subjects at Borders were generally younger  On Friday, Valley Square was having a festival, and many young people were outside, and less people were in Borders.

24. Conclusion  Borders had less people on average than Barnes and Noble, causing issues with expected counts  According to our experiment, gender and age do not affect bookstore or section choice, however, these conclusions could have been skewed by error  If we re-did this experiment…  We would record data from Borders on a day without a festival at Valley Square and when the store is familiar to the subjects  We would have tried to get more data from seniors  We would probably ask the people questions instead of simply spying on them