Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLesley Bailey Modified over 9 years ago
1
Integrity ∙ Excellence ∙ Respect
2
Overview What is it? Why do it? Benefits & Risks - Alaska DOT&PF Perspective Other States Discussion and Questions NEPA Assignment
3
Integrity ∙ Excellence ∙ Respect 23 USC 326 – Categorical Exclusion (CE) assignment AK, UT, CA* 23 USC 327 – Full NEPA assignment (CE, EA, EIS) CA, TX, OH(pending), UT (pending) NEPA Assignment – What is it?
4
Integrity ∙ Excellence ∙ Respect Formal assignment of FHWA, FTA, and/or FRA environmental responsibilities to the state DOT. State DOT considered the “Federal Agency” for projects Assumes liability for challenges in court Waiver of sovereign immunity Executed via Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) NEPA Assignment – What is it?
5
Integrity ∙ Excellence ∙ Respect Scope of NEPA Assignment State DOT Application defines scope By law, Federal Agency retains the following: Engineering decisions Project level air quality conformity determinations* (CE assignment differs) Government to government Tribal consultation USDOT responsibilities for statewide and metropolitan planning Projects that cross state lines NEPA Assignment – What is it?
6
Integrity ∙ Excellence ∙ Respect All environmental laws, regulations, and policies remain the same Faster project delivery comes from: Eliminating federal review and approval steps Allowing for environmental process innovation, experimentation NEPA Assignment – Why do it?
7
Integrity ∙ Excellence ∙ Respect Risks Liability – 11 th Amendment Waiver Attorney’s fees are Federal-aid eligible per MAP- 21 Staff Expertise, internal QA/QC required Dedicated staff or consultants for NEPA reviews State DOT Program staff for program oversight Regular audits by Federal Agencies (at the beginning) NEPA Assignment – Why do it?
8
Integrity ∙ Excellence ∙ Respect Benefits Autonomy and control over environmental decision making State ownership of decisions Faster environmental consultations, decisions Direct consultation with Federal Agencies Innovation Time = $ OH estimated 20% time savings, ~$20m / year savings NEPA Assignment – Why do it?
9
Integrity ∙ Excellence ∙ Respect 326 CE assignment since 2009 Established organizational change, HQ environmental oversight Innovations in procedures, forms, processes result in time savings FHWA role changed, support for program 327 Full NEPA assignment – The time is right CA,TX, OH paved the way Application regulations, template MOU Multi-state coordination, permanent law AK DOT&PF Perspective
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.