Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLester Moore Modified over 9 years ago
1
Challenge the future Delft University of Technology Energy and buildings Henk Visscher – Architecture and the Built Enviuronment - OTB Renewable Energy Systems
2
2 | 17 Content 1.Introduction of Energy Use in Buildings 2.Progress of energy renovations in the Dutch Housing Stock 3.Energy labels versus actual energy use
3
3 | 17 Introduction of Energy use in Buildings
4
4 | 17 Energy per sector in Europe (2002)
5
5 | 17 Energy in buildings is needed for A: Operation of the Building Heating and cooling Hot tap water Cooking Ventilation Lighting Building services as lifts etc. Appliances: Computers, tv’s, fridges, washing machines, dishwashers, vacuum cleaners, ect. B: Construction, Maintenance, Renovation, Demolition Embodied energy Construction process
6
6 | 17 Types of Buildings EU 75% Residential buildings 64% single family houses 36% apartment blocks 25% Non Residential 28% Wholesale and retail 23% Offices 17% Educational 11% Hotels and restaurants 7% Hospitals 4% Sport facilities 11% Other
7
7 | 17 Energy mix in residential buildings by region South Central & East North and West Biomass 27%Biomass 20%Biomass 21% Electricity 18%Electricity 1%Electricity 13% Oil 32%Coal 41%Coal 1% Gas 23%Oil 3%Oil 20% Gas 7%Gas 39% Distric heating 29%RES 6%
8
8 | 17 Main Energy sources / cariers in NL Gas for: heating, hot tap water, cooking District heating (cooling water form industry / electricity plant / waste burning for: heating, hot tap water ect. Electricity for: cooling, ventilation, lighting, appliances etc.
9
9 | 17 Energy and Buildings Other characteristics of the building stock: In Northern and middle Europe: most energy is used for heating Needed heating depends on the size of a building and the heat losses through the envelop The age of the building stock is high A very low adaptation rate Most EU countries: new production is only 1 % of the stock Regulations for insulation: introduced on low level around 1975 In NL energy performance reg’s in 1995 In 2020 in all EU all dwellings nearly zero energy
10
10 | 17 The energy problem, potential, policies and programs In EU 35 – 40 % of energy is used in Buildings Considered to be the sector with the most cost effective energy saving potential EU, national and local policies for reducing energy use Also: Renewable energy generation on and near buildings (PV, hot water, earth heat etc.)
11
11 | 17 Apporoach: trias energetica Priorities: 1.Reduce energy demand (insulation) 1.Improve efficiency of energy use (e.g. high efficiency heating boiler) 2.Replace fossil fuels by renewable energy
12
12 | 17 EU Energy targets and policies Policy documents Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) Energy performance Regulations for new buildings 2020 New: Nearly Zero Energy Buildings Energy Performance Certificates for sold or re- rented buildings Energy Efficiency Directive (EED) 2020: 20% CO 2 red. 20% renw. 2050: energy neutral stock 70% of the housing stock in 2050 already exists Required: 3% renovation per year at a very high level (and savings according the theoretical savings!!)
13
13 | 17 Energy Performance Certificate
14
14 | 17 Progress of Energy Renovations in the Dutch Housing Stock
15
15 | 17 The Dutch Housing Stock 17 million people, 7 million dwellings Tenure shipYear of constructionType of dwelling
16
16 | 17 Energy renovation in social housing sector in the Netherlands: Goal Covenant rental housing sector Housing associations, tenants union, government 2020: average label B Investigation on policy documents in 2013: only 25% of the SHO’s have adopted this goal
17
17 | 17 SHAERE database Set up and owned by Aedes: umbrella organisation of SHO’s in NL => 35% of the stock, 2.3 milj. Dwellings. All data necessary for Energy performance Certificates (EPC’s – Labels) Every year all SHO’s submit the data to Aedes including all improvements Progress from year to year can be monitored Year of reportingFrequency Percentage of the total SHO stock 2010 113294647.2% 2011 118606749.4% 2012 143870059.9% 2013 144826660.3%
18
18 | 17 Division over label categories from 2010 to 2013
19
19 | 17 Changes in label categories form 2010 to 2013 (n=1,537,554) 2010 ABCDEFG 2013 A 4292567982423206913351326377 B 1645954429413012661742691551 C 397335652651531658931906 D 34232038570143122532 E 180030191634738 F 1065296674 G 45380 Total4292517139344405242266624186815149263158
20
20 | 17 Changes in label categories form 2010 to 2013 (n=1,537,554)
21
21 | 17 Energy labels versus actual energy use
22
22 | 17 Relation between: energy labels (theory) and actual energy use (practice) National energy label data base Actual yearly energy use - bills (CBS) 200.000 cases
23
23 | 17 Results Theory Actual
24
24 | 17 Results G label: 50% less use than expected
25
25 | 17 Results A and B label: 10-20% more use than expected
26
26 | 17 Results Very little actual savings !!
27
27 | 17 Renovation with increased comfort 12 o C 14 o C 20 o C 21 o C 18 o C OLD NEW
28
28 | 17 Conclusions EU-NL High expectations of renovations to reduce heating demand Hugh investments are needed to reach the renovation goals In the SHO stock: only small steps are made, progress to slow When renovating poor performing dwellings to higher levels, a large share of potential savings are used to increase comfort Actual saving potential is lower Payback times do not work!
29
29 | 17 Alternative: Stroomversnelling http://www.wesselsrijssen.nl/nl/wo onconcepten/stroomversnelling
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.