Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAbner Whitehead Modified over 9 years ago
1
Fundamentals, Design, and Implementation, 9/e
2
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/2 Copyright © 2004 Agenda Questions from last Class? Assignment # 2 Corrected –2 D’s, 4 F’s and 1 non-submit Extremely poor performance We will go over assignment in detail Many violations of UMFK Academic Integrity Policy Assignment # 3 Posted due Feb 5 –Next class –I expect to see more individual effort –I will allow a few minutes to field questions First Exam –Feb 9 –Chaps 1-3 –20 M/C; 5 Short essays –60 min WebCT, Open book Today’s discussion –The Relational Model and Normalization
3
Fundamentals, Design, and Implementation, 9/e Chapter 4 The Relational Model and Normalization
4
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/4 Copyright © 2004 Relations Relational DBMS products store data in the form of relations, a special type of table A relation is a two-dimensional table that has the following characteristics –Rows contain data about an entity –Columns contain data about attributes of the entity –Cells of the table hold a single value –All entries in a column are of the same kind –Each column has a unique name –The order of the columns is unimportant –The order of the rows is unimportant –No two rows may be identical Although not all tables are relations, the terms table and relation are normally used interchangeably –Table/row/column = file/record/field = relation/tuple/attribute
5
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/5 Copyright © 2004 Example: Relation
6
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/6 Copyright © 2004 Example: Tables Not Relations
7
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/7 Copyright © 2004 Table-Relation or Not?
8
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/8 Copyright © 2004 Types of Keys A key is one or more columns of a relation that identifies a row A unique key identifies a single row; a non-unique key identifies several rows Composite key is a key that contains two or more attributes A relation has one unique primary key and may also have additional unique keys called candidate keys Primary key is used to –Represent the table in relationships –Organize table storage –Generate indexes
9
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/9 Copyright © 2004 Where’s the keys?
10
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/10 Copyright © 2004 Functional Dependencies A functional dependency occurs when the value of one (set of) attribute(s) determines the value of a second (set of) attribute(s) The attribute on the left side of the functional dependency is called the determinant –SID DormName, Fee –(CustomerNumber, ItemNumber, Quantity) Price While a primary key is always a determinant, a determinant is not necessarily a primary key –Question? –Are Candidate keys always a determinant?
11
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/11 Copyright © 2004 Functional Dependencies Examples Composite –ObjectColor -> Weight –ObjectColor -> Shape ObjectColor -> (Weight, Shape) –(CustomerNumber, ItemNumber, Quanity) -> Price CustomerNumber !-> Price
12
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/12 Copyright © 2004 Deletion Anomalies Deleting facts about one entity causes the deletion of facts about another entity
13
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/13 Copyright © 2004 Insertion Anomalies We cannot store facts about entity until we have another entity of different type to store –Add scuba to following
14
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/14 Copyright © 2004 Fixing Anomalies Split the relation
15
Fundamentals, Design, and Implementation, 9/e COS 346 DAY 6
16
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/16 Copyright © 2004 Agenda Questions from last Class? Assignment #3 due Assignment # 4 Posted due Feb 12 First Exam Next Class –Feb 9 –Chaps 1-3 –20 M/C; 5 Short essays –60 min WebCT, Open book Today’s discussion –The Relational Model and Normalization
17
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/17 Copyright © 2004 Normalization Normalization eliminates modification anomalies –Deletion anomaly: deletion of a row loses information about two or more entities –Insertion anomaly: insertion of a fact in one entity cannot be done until a fact about another entity is added Anomalies can be removed by splitting the relation into two or more relations; each with a different, single theme However, breaking up a relation may create referential integrity constraints Normalization works through classes of relations called normal forms
18
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/18 Copyright © 2004 Relationship of Normal Forms
19
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/19 Copyright © 2004 Normal Forms Any table of data is in 1NF if it meets the definition of a relation A relation is in 2NF if all its non-key attributes are dependent on all of the key (no partial dependencies) –If a relation has a single attribute key, it is automatically in 2NF A relation is in 3NF if it is in 2NF and has no transitive dependencies A relation is in BCNF if every determinant is a candidate key A relation is in fourth normal form if it is in BCNF and has no multi-value dependencies Fifth Normal form is too theoretical to bother with To be in Domain/Key Normal Form (DK/NF) every constraint on the relation must be a logical consequence of the definition of keys and domains.
20
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/20 Copyright © 2004 First Normal Form (1NF) Any table of data is in 1NF if it meets the definition of a relation To be in First Normal Form (1NF) a relation must have only single-valued attributes -- neither repeating groups nor arrays are permitted May have Modification anomalies
21
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/21 Copyright © 2004 Second Normal Form (2NF) A relation is in 2NF if all its non-key attributes are dependent on all of the key (no partial dependencies) –If a relation has a single attribute key, it is automatically in 2NF To be in Second Normal Form (2NF) the relation must be in 1NF and each nonkey attribute must be dependent on the whole key (not a subset of the key) Can have modification anomalies Fix by decomposing into two relations
22
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/22 Copyright © 2004 Not Second Normal Form Key (sid,Activity) Activity -> fee
23
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/23 Copyright © 2004 FIX
24
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/24 Copyright © 2004 Third Normal Form (3NF) To be in Third Normal Form (3NF) the relation must be in 2NF and no transitive dependencies may exist within the relation. A transitive dependency is when an attribute is indirectly functionally dependent on the key (that is, the dependency is through another nonkey attribute) Can have anomalies
25
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/25 Copyright © 2004 Violation of 3NF
26
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/26 Copyright © 2004 The Fix
27
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/27 Copyright © 2004 Boyce-Codd Normal Form (BCNF) To be in Boyce-Codd Normal Form (BCNF) the relation must be in 3NF and every determinant must be a candidate key.
28
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/28 Copyright © 2004 Violation of BCNF
29
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/29 Copyright © 2004 Fourth Normal Form (4NF) To be in Fourth Normal Form (4NF) the relation must be in BCNF and the relation may not contain multi-valued dependencies. Has update anomalies
30
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/30 Copyright © 2004 Violation of 4 TH NF
31
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/31 Copyright © 2004 Fixing 4thNF (Generally Speaking) A relation R(A,B,C) –A->->B –A->->C –B and C are independent Create R(A,B) andR1(A,C)
32
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/32 Copyright © 2004 FIX
33
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/33 Copyright © 2004 Fifth Normal Form (5NF) The Fifth Normal Form concerns dependencies that are obscure and beyond the scope of this text. Punt!
34
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/34 Copyright © 2004 Domain/Key Normal Form (DK/NF) To be in Domain/Key Normal Form (DK/NF) every constraint on the relation must be a logical consequence of the definition of keys and domains. Ultimate Normal Form –1981 Fagin NO possible anomalies
35
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/35 Copyright © 2004 DK/NF Terminology Constraint –A rule governing static values of attributes Key –A unique identifier of a tuple Domain –A description of an attribute’s allowable values
36
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/36 Copyright © 2004 DK/NF Example Domain/Key Definition of Example Above
37
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/37 Copyright © 2004 DK/NF Example
38
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/38 Copyright © 2004 DK/NF Example
39
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/39 Copyright © 2004 Summary of Normal Forms
40
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/40 Copyright © 2004 Example: DK/NF
41
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/41 Copyright © 2004 The Synthesis of Relations Given a set of attributes with certain functional dependencies, what relations should we form? Example: A and B are two attributes –If A B and B A A and B have a one-to-one attribute relationship –If A B, but B not A A and B have a many-to-one attribute relationship –If A not B and B not A A and B have a many-to-many attribute relationship
42
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/42 Copyright © 2004 One-to-One Attribute Relationships Attributes that have a one-to-one relationship must occur together in at least one relation Call the relation R and the attributes A and B: –Either A or B must be the key of R –An attribute can be added to R if it is functionally determined by A or B –An attribute that is not functionally determined by A or B cannot be added to R –A and B must occur together in R, but should not occur together in other relations –Either A or B should be consistently used to represent the pair in relations other than R
43
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/43 Copyright © 2004 Many-to-One Attribute Relationships Attributes that have a many-to-one relationship can exist in a relation together Assume C determines D in relation S –C must be the key of S –An attribute can be added to S if it is determined by C –An attribute that is not determined by C cannot be added to S
44
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/44 Copyright © 2004 Many-to-Many Attribute Relationships Attributes that have a many-to-many relationship can exist in a relation together Assume attributes E and F reside together in relation T –The key of T must be (E, F) –An attribute can be added to T if it is determined by the combination (E, F) –An attribute may not be added to T if it is not determined by the combination (E, F) –If adding a new attribute, G, expands the key to (E, F, G), then the theme of the relation has been changed Either G does not belong in T or the name of T must be changed to reflect the new theme
45
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/45 Copyright © 2004 Types of Attribute Relationship
46
Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design and Implementation, 9/e by David M. KroenkeChapter 4/46 Copyright © 2004 De-normalized Designs When a normalized design is unnatural, awkward, or results in unacceptable performance, a de-normalized design is preferred Example –Normalized relation CUSTOMER (CustNumber, CustName, Zip) CODES (Zip, City, State) –De-Normalized relations CUSTOMER (CustNumber, CustName, City, State, Zip)
47
Fundamentals, Design, and Implementation, 9/e Chapter 4 The Relational Model and Normalization
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.