Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

GOVST III, Paris Nov 2011 ECMWF ECMWF Activities on Coupled Forecasting Systems Status Ongoing research Needs for MJO Bulk formula in ocean models Plans.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "GOVST III, Paris Nov 2011 ECMWF ECMWF Activities on Coupled Forecasting Systems Status Ongoing research Needs for MJO Bulk formula in ocean models Plans."— Presentation transcript:

1 GOVST III, Paris Nov 2011 ECMWF ECMWF Activities on Coupled Forecasting Systems Status Ongoing research Needs for MJO Bulk formula in ocean models Plans New Marine Aspects Section Peter Janssen (head) Ocean/Sea Ice Waves Serving all time scales: analysis, medium range, monthly and seasonal

2 GOVST III, Paris Nov 2011 ECMWF Delayed Ocean Re-Analysis ~ORAS4 (NEMOVAR) Real Time Ocean Analysis ECMWF: Forecasting Systems ECMWF: Forecasting Systems Medium-Range (10-day) Partial coupling Medium-Range (10-day) Partial coupling Seasonal Forecasts Fully coupled Seasonal Forecasts Fully coupled Extended + Monthly Fully coupled Extended + Monthly Fully coupled Ocean model Atmospheric model Wave model Atmospheric model Ocean model Wave model Ocean Initial Conditions

3 GOVST III, Paris Nov 2011 ECMWF Monthly Forecasts needs Madden Julian Oscillation (MJO) is corner stone for monthly forecasting (as ENSO is for seasonal) It influences NAO regimes (Cassau et al 2008) and predictability over Europe (Vitart) MJO forecasts needs interactive ocean, good representation of ocean mixing (high vertical resolution) Woolnough et al, MWR 2007 Anomaly Correlation Persisted SST anomalies OGCM (10 m vertical res) Mixed layer (1 m vertical res)

4 GOVST III, Paris Nov 2011 ECMWF MJO revisited: PC1 and PC2 Models have improved: Even Persisted SST crosses the 0.6 value after day 20. Performance of persisted SST anomaly, current practice, is easy to beat by introducing coupling with the ocean. Not much differences between 1D KPP and 3D NEMO (10m level thickness)  Now there is a diurnal layer scheme in the atmosphere  NEMO mixing better than HOPE? The Observed SST (even weekly product) still better than coupling What is the performance with OSTIA? Can we expect to beat observed SST? Courtesy of Eric de Boisseson

5 GOVST III, Paris Nov 2011 ECMWF Bulk formula modifications (Hersbach, Janssen 2008) OLD-NEW: TauxOLD-NEW: Mixed Layer Depth OLD-NEW: SST Ultimately: to use the same bulk formula as in the atmosphere model (IFS) First Sensitivity: modify the empirical function for the drag coefficient as a function of wind speed to simulate the results from the IFS. It produces stronger drags for high winds. Impact on windstress ~ 10%. It impacts mixed layer depth. It reduces SST errors

6 GOVST III, Paris Nov 2011 ECMWF Plans Implement Sea Ice model Coupled it to monthly and seasonal forecasts Initialization of the sea-ice model Improve the Air-Sea interaction physics Bulk formula for estimation of fluxes (include wave effects, use IFS formula) Impact of waves in ocean mixing Improve Air-Sea interaction software infrastructure Single executable Develop software for a Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Reanalyses System (timeline uncertain)


Download ppt "GOVST III, Paris Nov 2011 ECMWF ECMWF Activities on Coupled Forecasting Systems Status Ongoing research Needs for MJO Bulk formula in ocean models Plans."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google