1. Nuclear Structure Data Evaluation & FRIB Low Energy Community Meeting, MSU, August 23-24, 2013 kondev@anl.gov John Kelley * NCState and TUNL for Filip Kondev

3. 3 Outline  Introduction: what is Nuclear Data historical perspective  Major Nuclear Physics Databases: NSR, ENSDF, XUNDL, AME  Other useful resources: Nuclear Structure and Nuclear Astrophysics

4. 4 ~3000 ~3000 nuclei the knowledge is very limited or nonexistent! ~6000 nuclei are predicted to exist Proton Drip Line

5. 5 What is Nuclear Data? … too applied to the basic physics …too academic to the applied physics … Generally: any result produced in a NP experiment can qualify Historically: associated with neutron cross sections and fission like applications

6. 6 Nuclear Physics in Important astrophysics, medicine, energy production, security supernova explosion nuclear power plant 99m Tc bone scan 238 PuO 2 (87.7 y) Cassini spacecraft - Saturn

7. Nuclear Physics is (still) a Big Challenge Question 3 How were the elements from iron to uranium made ? 11 physics questions for the new century

8. it is an interesting time in Nuclear Physics evaluated nuclear data - support various applications, assist scientific discoveries and preserve the knowledge for future generations it is an interesting time in Nuclear Physics evaluated nuclear data - support various applications, assist scientific discoveries and preserve the knowledge for future generations

9. 9 What takes to do a good evaluation it is a time consuming effort!  critical reading of all published (and sometime unpublished) work on a particular nuclide – working with the authors when possible  compilation of the results in appropriate formats - prepare individual data sets  critical review - recommends best values for a range of nuclear properties (not simply averaging numbers!) a number of computer codes are applied to check the data for consistency or to deduce some quantities, e.g. ICC, BXL, log ft, etc. the human factor is also very important  peer-review process – completeness & quality!  publication in Nuclear Data Sheets (and on the Web)

10. 10 What should a good database look like?  Comprehensive: All related quantities should be included, together with estimates of their uncertainties  Reliable: Data should be correctly represented  Complete: All available data of each type should be included  Up-to-Date: Consequences of new measurements should appear promptly  Accessible: Data should be easily available to the users via modern dissemination tools

11. 11 What is the value of evaluated data?  Interactive access to properties of many nuclei with a click of a mouse …  Archival of all nuclear structure and decay data  Resolve differences between overlapping and contradictory results  Beneficial consequences for nuclear theory development  Beneficial to many applied areas such as nuclear medicine, reactor engineering, environmental impact assessment, nuclear waste management, activation analysis, etc.  Identify and stimulate needs for new measurements

12. 12 Nuclear Structure Data Evaluation associated with nuclear structure databases – complex nuclear level schemes and tables of numerical values, which quantify fundamental nuclear structure information, such as level energies and quantum numbers, lifetimes, decay modes, and other associated properties. Nuclear Data Evaluation network activity service to various communities these databases are not only at the core of basic nuclear structure and nuclear astrophysics research, but they are also relevant to many applied technologies, including nuclear energy production, reactor design and safety, medical diagnostic and radiotherapy, health physics, environmental research and monitoring, safeguards, material analysis, etc. Today, far larger and more complex databases are urgently needed in many fields! Nuclear Physics perhaps has one of the best!

13. 13 Evaluation History – cont. courtesy of E. Browne (LBNL)

14. 14 “Google can do it all …” access to the most relevant articles and evaluated data on a particular nuclide access the recommended (best) values for a range of nuclear properties search on a specific nuclear property, quantity or reaction a lifetime of a graduate student???? Nuclear Science References (NSR)

15.  collaboration of scientists from ANL, LBNL, McMaster U. (Canada), NNDC (BNL), ORNL, TUNL & Texas A&M U, supported by the Office of Nuclear Physics, Office of Science, US DOE leveraged with effort from colleagues from several countries within the NSDD Network, established in 1974 under the auspices of IAEA, Vienna  Compile, Evaluate, Measure and Disseminate Nuclear Structure and Decay Data for ALL known nuclei (more than 3000!) that are used in basic science research and technology applications What we do: Nuclear Structure & DecayNuclear Reactions

16. Backbone of NSDD – leadership, technical expertise and mentoring host & maintain ENSDF, NSR & network programs developing countries Europe, FSU & Turkey Asia – Japan, China, India & Kuwait S. America Australia Europe, FSU & Turkey Asia – Japan, China, India & Kuwait S. America Australia NSDD Network

17. www.nndc.bnl.gov The focal point

18. 18 Contents: Evaluated nuclear structure and decay data for all known nuclei, organized in over 290 mass chains Adopted (best values) Levels: (E, J , T 1/2, , Q, configurations) Gammas: (E , BR, M, , ICC) Decays  -  +  +   - n etc. Reactions (HI,xn  ) (p,p’) (n,  ), (n,xn  ) Coul. Exc. ( ,  ’), ( ,xn  ) (d,p), etc. ENSDF www.nndc.bnl.gov/ensdf ENSDF – the core database

19. ENSDF – the core database – cont. ENSDF is the only Nuclear Structure database that is updated continuously – contains information for ALL nuclei and ALL nuclear level properties & radiations – currently contributed by members of the Nuclear Structure and Decay Data Network, under auspices of IAEA. It is maintained by NNDC and the NSDD role is indispensible! No viable alternative exists in the world! MIRD RADWARE Monte-Carlo Codes MCNP, GEANT, EGS4 ORIGEN, CINDER90 NUBASE RIPL ORTEC & CANBERRA ENSDF Applications ENDF, JEFF, JENDL … Simulations Basic NP Research RNAL PGAA NuDat astrophysics IE

20. NDS e-Subscr. (Elsevier) – 4705 accounts with 11.7K (paid) downloads (2007) USA & Canada(25%), EU (39%), Asia (33%), Africa (1.5%) & Australia (1.5%) ENSDF usage www.nndc.bnl.gov 44% US & Canada preparation of experiments – during experiments – data analysis & publications – journal reviewers etc.

21. 21 J=68 (SD 152 Dy)? 130 Ag-21 n from 109 Ag 169 Au-28 n from 197 Au Ex=36 MeV ( 149 Gd) from 2923 nuclei known 785 nuclei with only 1 level 1101 nuclei with no  known 40 Ca – 578 levels 53 Mn – 1319  rays E6 in decay of the 19/2- (2.5 min) isomer in 53 Fe www.nndc.bnl.gov/ensdf

22. 22 Protons Challenges away from the line of stability What was believed to be in 177 Yb is actually an excited structure in the neighboring 175 Yb isotope 177 175 178 50 100150 Neutrons Proton drip line Neutron drip line 100 50 Several publications in Phys. Rev. C

23. 23 … a paper that was not so correct … From: Balraj Singh [ndgroup@univmail.cis.mcmaster.ca] Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 5:52 PM To: Kondev, Filip G. Subject: Re: NSDD-2005: Visa ; 174Yb paper Hi Filip: … About 174Yb: We have compiled your paper for XUNDL and will send it to BNL today. There is one curious thing about the 830- microsecond isomer. In the literature (ENSDF and 1967Bo08: NP A96, 561) value of 830 corresponded to half-life rather than meanlife. In your paper it is being referred as meanlife everwhere, including in table III where BEL's are deduced. Also in table III, for 628 gamma from this isomer, I seem to get BE2 a factor of 10 higher than your value using 830 as meanlife. Could you please check these points and let me know what you think. Thanks, Balraj

24. 24 Identify & Stimulate needs for new measurements 11.4 MeV/nucleon 136 Xe beam on 186 W target; thermal ion source; mass separation 2.7 MeV 3.9 MeV 177 Hf 177 Lu

25. 25 Deep Inelastic Experiments at ANL   n n Target: 176 Lu  enriched 50% (n. abd. 2.6%)  J  =7- Beam: 136 Xe @ 820 MeV Pulsed beam & Gammasphere at ANL Target: 175 Lu, 174 Yb ANL,ANU, UML collaboration – 3 expt. campaigns at ANL 1 Phys. Rev. Lett 2 Phys. Lett. B 2 Phys. Rev. C 1 Eur. Phys. J

26. 26 K  =39/2- isomer in 177 Lu G.D. Dracoulis et al., Phys. Lett. B584 (2004) Incomplete Fusion T.McGoram, ANU T 1/2 =160.44 d

27. 27 K-Isomers in deformed nuclei  Prediction of energies, J  – OK  Prediction of T1/2? – not so good!

28. 28 Horizontal Evaluations and Topical Reviews  Log ft values in  -/(EC+b+) decay  Alpha-decay HF from even-even nuclei  Nuclear Moments (  and Q 0 )  Proton Radioactivity Decay Data many other applications oriented … Nuclear Data Sheets v. 97 (2002) 241

30. 30 Opportunities Overseas: RIKEN, TRIUMF, GANIL, CERN, GSI (planned) a surge of new data can be foreseen in the near future – nuclear structure & reactions involving radioactive nuclei far from the line of stability – all new data need to be promptly compiled, evaluated & disseminated to enhance scientific discoveries and to assist technology applications - development of new evaluation methodologies, strategies & dissemination tools that are tailored to the specific needs of variety of users – archive for future generations The NP community would require even more sophisticated databases that couple Experiments, Theory & Data Evaluation with the modern computer technology U.S. facilities: ANL, ORNL & MSU FRIB – the future in U.S. GRETINA-AGATA  ray tracking arrays ~3000 nuclei yet to be discovered ~3000 nuclei known

31. up in the Cloud …. Thank you!