1. Using GIS to Identify and Analyze Prospective Locations John Mazzello CRP 551 Final Project July 27, 2011

2. Problem Statement What are the best locations in Iowa for locating an after-school educational enrichment program, using school test scores data, poverty rates, and access to outdoor natural resources (i.e., parks)? For the purposes of this assignment, assume that all public schools in Iowa are potential locations for an after-school program. July 27, 20112John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs

3. Background and Rationale I worked for an organization that ran before- and after-school programs at a number of public school locations. When starting a program at a new location, we attempted to secure grant funding, such as from the Department of Education’s 21st Century Community Learning Centers program (21CCLC).21st Century Community Learning Centers program 21CCLC is targeted toward rural or urban schools with high poverty and low test scores, and is designed to improve students’ performance in their classes and on standardized tests. When applying for 21CCLC funding, applicants have to demonstrate that their proposed school locations meet the eligibility requirements. July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs3

4. Background and Rationale I developed this project because: I wanted to show that the skills we have learned in class can be used to identify possible locations for similar after-school programs. An analysis performed using GIS techniques can provide strong supporting evidence for a grant application. While at Iowa State, I have also been volunteering with an organization that attempts to connect students with Iowa’s natural and cultural resources. This organization believes that students perform better when they have access to educational activities outside the classroom. After-school programs let students experience activities that may be impossible during the school day because of curriculum requirements, such as outdoor recreation and learning. July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs4

5. Analysis Criteria: Therefore, I will perform a suitability analysis to identify schools in Iowa that meet the following criteria : An underperforming school (designated by the Iowa Department of Education as a “School in Need of Assistance” Located in an area with high poverty rates (upper 20% of census tract poverty rates) Located in close proximity to a city or county park (within two miles) July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs5

6. GIS Processes Used (Summary) 1. Creation of a file geodatabase for storing downloaded data and layer files, as well as results of geoprocessing and analysis. 2. Geocoding the addresses of public schools in Iowa. 3. Creation of buffers around high poverty locations to identify potential schools. 4. Creation of buffers around park and recreation opportunities to identify potential schools. 5. Intersect the poverty buffers and the park buffers to create preferred areas for after-school programs. July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs6

7. Problem-Solving Approach Step 1: I downloaded contact information for all public schools in Iowa from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) Elementary/Secondary Information System.Elementary/Secondary Information System This listing contains 1468 schools in Iowa. I will use this listing to geocode the addresses of each school. While NRGIS also contains data on Iowa schools, I am using the NCES data instead because its school names match the names in another data set I will use later. July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs7

8. Problem-Solving Approach July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs8 Example of the public school contact information tables from NCES

9. Problem-Solving Approach Step 2: I downloaded State of Iowa data from the Natural Resources Geographic Information Systems Library (NRGIS).NRGIS Downloaded layers were: Iowa Counties Poverty by Incorporated Place Conservation and Recreation Lands with Public Access Iowa Roads (2006), Highways, and Interstate Highways July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs9

10. Problem-Solving Approach Step 3: Next, I used ArcCatalog to create a file geodatabase and add the school address table and the NRGIS layers. Step 4: I added the county, roads, and school address data from the geodatabase into an ArcMap document and verified the coordinate system (NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N). July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs10

11. Problem-Solving Approach Step 5: I geocoded the school addresses using ArcMap’s built- in address locator: US Streets Geocode Service (ArcGIS online) 91% of the addresses were geo- coded automatically. I rematched the others as in chapter 7 of the GIS Tutorial 1 book (by correcting addresses, finding them on Google Maps, using the Street layer, etc.). July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs11

12. Problem-Solving Approach Step 6: I downloaded a list of 2010-11 Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) from the Iowa Department of Education. Schools that do not meet test score benchmarks or participation requirements under the No Child Left Behind law are designated as SINA.Iowa Department of Education The SINA data was in PDF format. After downloading, I needed to manipulate the data in Excel to “clean up” the columns and make sure that school names matched the names from the address list I downloaded from NCES. July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs12

13. Problem-Solving Approach Step 7: Using the school name, I joined a table with the schools in need of assistance to the geocoded schools layer in ArcMap. This then allowed me to select just the subset of schools that were in need of assistance (i.e., were underperforming according to No Child Left Behind) using “Select By Attributes.” The 328 remaining schools are the locations I used as potential after-school program sites. July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs13

14. July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs14 Data conversion: PDF… To Excel… To ArcMap

15. Problem-Solving Approach Step 8: Using NRGIS data, I added a new layer to my map for poverty levels in incorporated places. While the entire state is not covered by incorporated places, over 95% of schools in need of assistance are located within one. Furthermore, all but 5 schools are located within one mile of an incorporated place. Therefore, I am comfortable using poverty data for these places to identify schools that meet my criteria. Note that NRGIS poverty data is from 2000. Please see later slides for a discussion of why I chose to use this data instead of 2010 Census data. July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs15

16. Problem-Solving Approach Step 9: Using the Symbology feature in the layer properties, I classified the 2000 poverty rate for each incorporated place as five quantiles. The quantile of incorporated places with the highest poverty had rates of 12.7% to 50% of the population in poverty. I exported the upper 20% of places to a new layer. I then created a 1-mile buffer around these high- poverty incorporated places, and selected the schools that fell within the buffer. These are the 113 schools that meet my high poverty rate criterion. July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs16

17. July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs17 All Four Quartiles of Poverty Rates in Incorporated Places, with Schools

18. Problem-Solving Approach Step 10: I added the Conservation and Recreation Lands with Public Access layer, which I downloaded from NRGIS. The lands in this layer have many types of owners and purposes. There are city parks, forest reserves, National Wildlife Refuges, and more. The most appropriate types for convenient student after-school use are arboretums, city parks, county parks, and greenbelts. I exported these types of recreation lands to a new layer. July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs18

19. Problem-Solving Approach Step 11: Using the Buffer function, I created a 2-mile buffer around these student-friendly recreation areas. 2 miles is an appropriate distance for students and after-school program leaders to travel (on foot or by vehicle) to a recreational area on a relatively frequent basis. The schools that fall within the buffered areas meet my proximity to a city or county park criterion. 125 schools meet this criterion. July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs19

20. July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs20 Student-Friendly Park Lands with 2-Mile Buffer and Schools

21. Problem-Solving Approach Step 12: Using the Intersect geoprocessing function, I created a new layer reflecting the overlap between the high-poverty buffers and the parks and recreation buffers. The schools that fall in this intersected area are those that meet both the high poverty and access to recreational areas criteria. These are the schools that can be considered the best locations for after-school programs according to the criteria I developed. July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs21

22. July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs22 High-Poverty and Park Buffers, and Intersection, with Schools

23. Problem-Solving Approach Out of the original 1468 public schools in Iowa: 328 are identified as schools in need of assistance. 113 are in high-poverty areas (upper 20% poverty rates). 125 are within 2 miles of a student-friendly park land. And only 31 meet all three criteria. This represents only 2% of all public schools in Iowa. This project has been able to demonstrate that geoprocessing can be used to address the problem statement. A large number of schools has been refined into a small number of preferred locations. July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs23

24. Final Recommended After-School Site Locations July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs24

25. Discussion This project was definitely a learning experience. I believe I got some good practice navigating the many sources of data available online and in performing geocoding and geoprocessing on real-life data. However, there were some areas where I feel I could improve the project if I were to do it again. First, I had originally wanted to use Census 2010 Tiger/Shapefile and American Factfinder data for demographics like income, which I instead took from NRGIS. I planned to use Census Block data, but when I tried to download the data for the entire state, the Census website could not process all the blocks at once (it kept timing out). Instead, I had to download blocks for each county individually, which would have been unreasonably time-consuming. July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs25

26. Discussion Next, I thought about doing the project for just one county, but counties with enough interesting schools (like Polk County) had so many schools and parks in close proximity that almost every school met the criteria. The project would not have been as interesting. I also had originally planned to use proximity to a large number of students (5-17 year old population) as a criteria, instead of parks. However, when I was unable to download block data, I found that whole Census tracts were simply too large to use convincingly for this purpose. Furthermore, even if I had downloaded the Block data instead of using data from NRGIS, the blocks would have been so small on the statewide map that it would have been difficult to see individual Block differences. July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs26

27. Discussion Therefore, I think I should have thought more clearly about the focus area of my project before starting it. Next, I would have paid closer attention to the requirements of data cleanup. Almost everything I downloaded, from NCES and from the Iowa Department of Education as well as from the Census (while I was trying to use that information) required a lot of editing in Excel. My criteria may also have been too restrictive. For example, using poverty rates, I Identified Ames but not Des Moines as a high-poverty, area. Clearly, one could argue that Des Moines needs after-school programs, especially as it has many schools in need of assistance. Finally, I realize that because of the small size of the buffers around incorporated areas and parks, when my maps are zoomed to the entire state, they look less “interesting” than I had originally hoped. Therefore, I added a small sample map to “spice up” my layout. July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs27

28. Copies of Final Outputs: Overall Map July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs28

29. Copies of Final Outputs: Schools July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs29

30. Copies of Final Outputs: Schools and Poverty July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs30

31. Copies of Final Outputs: Schools and Parks July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs31

32. Copies of Final Outputs: Final Recommendations July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs32

33. Copies of Final Outputs: Sample Zoomed-In Map July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs33

34. References Gorr, W.L. and Kurland, K.S. (2011). GIS Tutorial 1: Basic Workbook. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press. Iowa Department of Education. (2010). Schools and Districts in Need of Assistance (SINA/DINA). http://educateiowa.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1923&catid=497&Itemid=2 617 Iowa Department of Natural Resources. (2011). Natural Resources Geographic Information Systems Library. http://www.igsb.uiowa.edu/nrgislibx/ National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Elementary and Secondary Information System. http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/elsi/ U.S. Department of Education. (2011). 21st Century Community Learning Centers. http://www2.ed.gov/programs/21stcclc/index.html Used but not included in final project: U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). American FactFinder. http://factfinder2.census.gov U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). Downloading Data from the New American FactFinder to use with TIGER/Line Shapefiles. http://www.census.gov/geo/www/tiger/wwtl/brochures/DownloadingAFFData.pdf U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). Working with TIGER/Line Shapefiles. http://www.census.gov/geo/www/tiger/wwtl/wwtl.html July 27, 2011John Mazzello: Selecting Locations for After-School Programs34