Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Legal Compliance MANA 5341 Staffing and Performance Management Staffing and Performance Management.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Legal Compliance MANA 5341 Staffing and Performance Management Staffing and Performance Management."— Presentation transcript:

1 Legal Compliance MANA 5341 Staffing and Performance Management Staffing and Performance Management

2 Major Staffing Laws Classifying Employees FLSA and Internal Revenue Code FLSA and Internal Revenue Code Equal Opportunity Civil Rights Acts (1964 and 1991) Civil Rights Acts (1964 and 1991) ADA and ADEA ADA and ADEA Affirmative Action Executive Order 11246 Executive Order 11246Immigration Immigration Reform and Control Act Immigration Reform and Control Act Wages and Benefits Equal Pay Act Equal Pay Act Many others….

3 Classifying Employees “Flexible” employment practices have risen sharply last 10-15 years. 1. Independent Contractors 2. FLSA (Salaried vs. Hourly) 3. Temporary Employees

4 What is an Independent Contractor? An employer does not generally have to withhold or pay any taxes on payments to independent contractors. An employer does not generally have to withhold or pay any taxes on payments to independent contractors. W2 vs. 1099 W2 vs. 1099 General rule: An individual is a contractor if the employer controls only the result of the work and not the means and methods of accomplishing the result. General rule: An individual is a contractor if the employer controls only the result of the work and not the means and methods of accomplishing the result. Behavioral control Behavioral control Financial control Financial control Relationship with firm Relationship with firmhttp://www.irs.ustreas.gov/pub/irs-utl/emporind.pdf

5 IRS Example Vera Elm, an electrician, submitted a job estimate to a housing complex for electrical work at $16 per hour for 400 hours. Vera Elm, an electrician, submitted a job estimate to a housing complex for electrical work at $16 per hour for 400 hours. She is to receive $1,280 every 2 weeks for the next 10 weeks. This is not considered payment by the hour. Even if she works more or less than 400 hours to complete the work, Vera will receive $6,400. She is to receive $1,280 every 2 weeks for the next 10 weeks. This is not considered payment by the hour. Even if she works more or less than 400 hours to complete the work, Vera will receive $6,400. Vera sets her own schedule but is required to complete the work in 10 weeks subject to inspection upon completion. She also performs additional electrical installations under contracts with other companies, that she obtained through advertisements. Vera sets her own schedule but is required to complete the work in 10 weeks subject to inspection upon completion. She also performs additional electrical installations under contracts with other companies, that she obtained through advertisements.

6 IRS Example Vera Elm, an electrician, submitted a job estimate to a housing complex for electrical work at $16 per hour for 400 hours. Vera Elm, an electrician, submitted a job estimate to a housing complex for electrical work at $16 per hour for 400 hours. She is to receive $1,280 every 2 weeks for the next 10 weeks. This is not considered payment by the hour. Even if she works more or less than 400 hours to complete the work, Vera will receive $6,400. She is to receive $1,280 every 2 weeks for the next 10 weeks. This is not considered payment by the hour. Even if she works more or less than 400 hours to complete the work, Vera will receive $6,400. Vera sets her own schedule but is required to complete the work in 10 weeks subject to inspection upon completion. She also performs additional electrical installations under contracts with other companies, that she obtained through advertisements. Vera sets her own schedule but is required to complete the work in 10 weeks subject to inspection upon completion. She also performs additional electrical installations under contracts with other companies, that she obtained through advertisements. Vera is an Independent Contractor Vera is an Independent Contractor

7 Temporary Employees Temps are employees of an employment agency, not the organization where they work. Temps are employees of an employment agency, not the organization where they work. Companies cannot use long-term temporary employment only to deny benefits to employees. Companies cannot use long-term temporary employment only to deny benefits to employees. Vizcaino vs. Microsoft (1999) Vizcaino vs. Microsoft (1999) Microsoft Corp. will pay $97 million to settle a federal lawsuit from employees who claimed the software giant classified them as "temporary" workers for years to deny them standard benefits such as health insurance and the lucrative employee stock purchase plan, thereby saving the company millions. Between 8,000 and 12,000 people were eligible for a share of the settlement. LA Times 12.13.00

8 Changes at Microsoft Guidelines to help managers figure out when a job shouldn't be given to a temporary employee. Guidelines to help managers figure out when a job shouldn't be given to a temporary employee. Policy prohibiting temporary employees from working more than 12 months at a stretch without taking at least a 100-day break. Policy prohibiting temporary employees from working more than 12 months at a stretch without taking at least a 100-day break. Temporary workers wear orange badges instead of the blue badges for permanent employees. Temporary workers wear orange badges instead of the blue badges for permanent employees. Temporary workers are not permitted to use the company health club, play on the company baseball and soccer fields or allowed to attend company parties. Temporary workers are not permitted to use the company health club, play on the company baseball and soccer fields or allowed to attend company parties.

9 Fair Labor Standards Act (FSLA) Passed in 1938 and amended many times Passed in 1938 and amended many times Nonexempt workers earn a minimum wage of not less than $5.15 an hour, effective September 1, 1997. Nonexempt workers earn a minimum wage of not less than $5.15 an hour, effective September 1, 1997. Overtime pay at not less than one and one-half times regular pay is required after 40 hours a workweek. Overtime pay at not less than one and one-half times regular pay is required after 40 hours a workweek. An employee must be at least 16 years old to work in most non- farm jobs and at least 18 to work in non-farm jobs declared hazardous by the Secretary of Labor. An employee must be at least 16 years old to work in most non- farm jobs and at least 18 to work in non-farm jobs declared hazardous by the Secretary of Labor. Youths 14 and 15 years old may work outside school hours in various non-manufacturing, non-mining, non-hazardous jobs under certain conditions Youths 14 and 15 years old may work outside school hours in various non-manufacturing, non-mining, non-hazardous jobs under certain conditions

10 New Overtime Rules First major change to FSLA in 50 years. First major change to FSLA in 50 years. http://www.dol.gov/esa/regs/compliance/whd/fairpay/ In 2003 record $212.5 million in back wages was collected from employers – a 20% increase from 2002. In 2003 record $212.5 million in back wages was collected from employers – a 20% increase from 2002. RadioShack will pay $29.9 million in unpaid overtime claims of 1,300 managers in California. Similar suits at Eckerd, Starbucks, and Farmer’s Insurance RadioShack will pay $29.9 million in unpaid overtime claims of 1,300 managers in California. Similar suits at Eckerd, Starbucks, and Farmer’s Insurance U-Haul suit by 1,200 managers was dismissed due to substantial evidence that the supervisors "spend the majority of their time performing exempt managerial tasks" U-Haul suit by 1,200 managers was dismissed due to substantial evidence that the supervisors "spend the majority of their time performing exempt managerial tasks"

11 To be exempt from FLSA: Salary Basis Test Salary Basis Test Be paid a salary Be paid a salary Salary Level Test Salary Level Test Earn a minimum of $23,660/yr (old $8060/yr) Earn a minimum of $23,660/yr (old $8060/yr) White collar workers who earn more than $100k are exempt White collar workers who earn more than $100k are exempt Blue collar workers “skilled trades” are NOT exempt Blue collar workers “skilled trades” are NOT exempt “Duties” Test “Duties” Test “Administrative” “Administrative” “Professional” “Professional” “Executive” “Executive” “Outside Sales” “Outside Sales” “An employee who leads a team of other employees assigned to complete major projects” “An employee who leads a team of other employees assigned to complete major projects”

12 “Administrative Duties” Whose primary duty (50%) is the performance of office or non-manual work directly related to the management or general business operations of the employer or the employer’s customers; and Whose primary duty (50%) is the performance of office or non-manual work directly related to the management or general business operations of the employer or the employer’s customers; and Whose primary duty includes the exercise of discretion and independent judgment with respect to matters of significance. Whose primary duty includes the exercise of discretion and independent judgment with respect to matters of significance.

13 FSLA – Special Cases Tipped employees Tipped employees Domestic service workers Domestic service workers Teachers and administrative personnel in elementary and secondary schools Teachers and administrative personnel in elementary and secondary schools Outside sales employees Outside sales employees Employees in certain computer-related occupations Employees in certain computer-related occupations Employees of certain seasonal amusement or recreational establishments Employees of certain seasonal amusement or recreational establishments Employees engaged in fishing operations Employees engaged in fishing operations Employees engaged in newspaper delivery Employees engaged in newspaper delivery Farm workers Farm workers Casual babysitters Casual babysitters Certain commissioned employees of retail or service establishments Certain commissioned employees of retail or service establishments Employees of railroads and air carriers Employees of railroads and air carriers Taxi drivers Taxi drivers Nurses Nurses Announcers of certain non-metropolitan broadcasting stations Announcers of certain non-metropolitan broadcasting stations Employees of motion picture theaters Employees of motion picture theaters Employees of certain bulk petroleum distributors Employees of certain bulk petroleum distributors Many others…. Many others….

14 What are the differences between: Diversity Diversity Equal Employment Opportunity Equal Employment Opportunity Affirmative Action? Affirmative Action?

15 EEO Laws Title VII of the Civil Rights Act 1964 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act 1964 Civil Rights Act of 1991 Civil Rights Act of 1991 Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA)

16 Protected Groups Race Race Color Color Religion Religion Sex Sex National origin National origin Age Age Disability Disability

17 Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VII (a) It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer – (1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or (2) to limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

18 Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VII (a) It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer – DISPARATE TREATMENT (1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or ADVERSE IMPACT (2) to limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

19 Court Cases Griggs v. Duke Power (1971) Griggs v. Duke Power (1971) McDonnell Douglas vs. Green (1972) McDonnell Douglas vs. Green (1972) Connecticut vs. Teal (1982) Connecticut vs. Teal (1982) Watson vs. Ft. Worth Bank & Trust (1988) Watson vs. Ft. Worth Bank & Trust (1988) Rudder vs. District of Columbia (1995) Rudder vs. District of Columbia (1995)

20 Court Cases Griggs v. Duke Power (1971) Griggs v. Duke Power (1971) Adverse impacts must be job related Adverse impacts must be job related Discriminatory intent not sufficient defense Discriminatory intent not sufficient defense McDonnell Douglas vs. Green (1972) McDonnell Douglas vs. Green (1972) To establish prima facia in disparate treatment cases To establish prima facia in disparate treatment cases Connecticut vs. Teal (1982) Connecticut vs. Teal (1982) Applies to each parts of a multi-step process Applies to each parts of a multi-step process Watson vs. Ft. Worth Bank & Trust (1988) Watson vs. Ft. Worth Bank & Trust (1988) Adverse impact applied to interviews Adverse impact applied to interviews Rudder vs. District of Columbia (1995) Rudder vs. District of Columbia (1995) Affirm job analysis and content validity of tests Affirm job analysis and content validity of tests

21 Civil Rights Act of 1991 Followed Wards Cove Packing vs. Antonio (1989) Followed Wards Cove Packing vs. Antonio (1989) Prohibits “race norming” of tests. Prohibits “race norming” of tests. Plaintiffs can sue for punitive damages in cases of intentional discrimination. Plaintiffs can sue for punitive damages in cases of intentional discrimination. Adverse impact prohibited for each piece of a selection system. Adverse impact prohibited for each piece of a selection system. Burden of proof on the employer. Burden of proof on the employer. Prohibits quotas in selection. Prohibits quotas in selection.

22 EEO Applied Organizations with more than 15 employees. Organizations with more than 15 employees. Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures http://www.dol.gov/dol/allcfr/Title_41/Part_60-3/toc.htm Principles for Validation and use of Employee Selection Procedures Principles for Validation and use of Employee Selection Procedures http://www.siop.org/_Principles/principles.pdf EEO does NOT require preferential treatment EEO does NOT require preferential treatment Quotas are illegal by Civil Rights Act of 1991 Quotas are illegal by Civil Rights Act of 1991 Must keep records of applicants for 6 months Must keep records of applicants for 6 months

23 EEO Applied Employer must show practices are “job-related for the position in question and consistent with business necessity” Employer must show practices are “job-related for the position in question and consistent with business necessity” Company Defenses Company Defenses Merit Merit Bona Fide Occupational Qualification Bona Fide Occupational Qualification Business Necessity Business Necessity An “alternative employment practice” must be accepted if shown to meet the business necessity and have less adverse impact. An “alternative employment practice” must be accepted if shown to meet the business necessity and have less adverse impact.

24 Presentation of Evidence Must prove that rejection was discriminatory. Plaintiff Provides a clear and specific job ‑ based explanation for actions. Defendant He or She demonstrates: a) Protected class b) Was qualified c) Was rejected d) The job remained open “McDonnell-Douglas Test” Plaintiff Disparate Treatment Demonstrates Job relatedness (validity) and business necessity Proves that an alternative practice is available that has less adverse impact 4/5’ths Rule Standard Deviations Rule Adverse Impact

25 Std. Dev. RULE Number selected needs to be within +(-) 2 standard deviation units from the “expected” case. % Minority applicants X % NonMinority applicants X # Selected 4/5ths RULE The selection rate for any protected group should be no less than 4/5ths or 80% of the selection rate for the group with the highest rate of selection. If SR1 *.8 > SR2, then Adverse Impact. Number Hired Number Hired Selection Rate (SR) = Number of Applicants Number of Applicants Selection Rate Tests S.D.=

26 4/5ths Rule Assume 200 employees were selected from a pool of 500 applicants (200 black and 300 white). Of the employees selected 60 were black and 140 were white. Selection Rates: White = 140 / 300 = 46.7% Black = 60 / 200 = 30% 4/5 ths Rule:.467 X.8 =.374 = 37.4% Since 30% (actual selection rate) is less than 37.4% (4/5ths comparison selection rate) evidence of discrimination exists.

27 200 300 200 300 X X 200 X X 200 500 500 500 500 Std. Deviation Rule Assume 200 employees were selected from a pool of 500 applicants (200 black and 300 white). # of Minority Applicants # of Non Applicants # of Minority Applicants # of Non Applicants X X # Selected X X # Selected # of Applicants # of Applicants # of Applicants # of Applicants S.D.= S.D.= =.4 X.6 X 200 = 6.92

28 Std. Deviation Rule Overall selection rate = 40% (200 out of 500) Overall selection rate = 40% (200 out of 500) If blacks were selected at the same rate as whites we would expect: If blacks were selected at the same rate as whites we would expect: 200 X.4 = 80 Blacks 300 X.4 = 120 Whites Std. Rule states that the actual number selected should be within +/- 2 Std. Deviations from the expected number. Std. Rule states that the actual number selected should be within +/- 2 Std. Deviations from the expected number. S.D. = 6.93 or “7” 2 S.D. = 14 Target Range for Blacks: 80 +/- 14 = 66 to 94 Target Range for Blacks: 80 +/- 14 = 66 to 94 According to this, if fewer than 66 out of 200 were selected, then evidence of discrimination exists.

29 Wal-Mart, employs 1.3 million workers at roughly 3,522 Wal-Mart and Sam's Clubs. Wal-Mart, employs 1.3 million workers at roughly 3,522 Wal-Mart and Sam's Clubs. Certified as a class: 1.6 million women who worked for Wal-Mart's U.S. stores at any time since Dec. 26, 1998. Certified as a class: 1.6 million women who worked for Wal-Mart's U.S. stores at any time since Dec. 26, 1998. Women comprise over 72% of Wal-Mart's sales workforce and less than 33% of its managers. Women comprise over 72% of Wal-Mart's sales workforce and less than 33% of its managers. “Wal-Mart's Women Troubles”

30 The Plaintiff’s Case Title%Women %Men %Men Store manager 14.3%85.7% Co-manager22.80%77.2% Asst. manager 35.7%64.3% Mgt. trainee 41.3%58.7% Cashier92.5%7.5% Source: Drogin Kakigi & Assoc.

31 Wal-Mart’s Defense Wal-Mart says it classifies management positions differently from its competitors. For example, it says department "managers" are not included in the count of managers because they are not salaried positions. Wal-Mart says it classifies management positions differently from its competitors. For example, it says department "managers" are not included in the count of managers because they are not salaried positions. "If we included these, our overall percentage would probably be close to 50%," the company says. "If we included these, our overall percentage would probably be close to 50%," the company says. Wal-Mart men average higher seniority and are more willing to relocate. Wal-Mart men average higher seniority and are more willing to relocate.

32 ADEA (1967) and Age Discrimination Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 Protects employees 70 million workers over 40 Protects employees 70 million workers over 40 Nearly 50% of workers Nearly 50% of workers Cases most often arise from layoff or dismissal Cases most often arise from layoff or dismissal It is legitimate to consider salary in layoffs It is legitimate to consider salary in layoffs No standard of “reverse discrimination” for age suits No standard of “reverse discrimination” for age suits Disparate impact rules apply Disparate impact rules apply Adams vs. Florida Power Corp Adams vs. Florida Power Corp Dismissed by the Supreme Court 2002 Dismissed by the Supreme Court 2002 Smith vs. City of Jackson Smith vs. City of Jackson Affirmed by the Supreme Court 2005 Affirmed by the Supreme Court 2005

33 Discrimination is prohibited against individuals with disabilities who can perform essential job functions with reasonable accommodation unless it would cause undue hardship. Discrimination is prohibited against individuals with disabilities who can perform essential job functions with reasonable accommodation unless it would cause undue hardship. Employers not required to change work rules if they are business necessity. Employers not required to change work rules if they are business necessity. OFCCP vs. Ozark Airlines (1986) – employers must prove applicant could not perform the job safely. OFCCP vs. Ozark Airlines (1986) – employers must prove applicant could not perform the job safely. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

34 Disability is a physical or mental impairment that affects a major life activity. Disability is a physical or mental impairment that affects a major life activity. Essential vs. marginal job functions Essential vs. marginal job functions Categories of "reasonable accommodations": Categories of "reasonable accommodations": changes to a job application process changes to a job application process changes to the work environment changes to the work environment changes to the way a job is usually done changes to the way a job is usually done employee training employee training Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

35 Man fired for getting gassed on spilled ethanol at work Man fired for getting gassed on spilled ethanol at work An Iowa judge has denied unemployment benefits to a man who claimed discrimination after being fired from an ethanol plant for drinking "automobile fuel" produced by the company. According to Neddermeyer, he showed up for work and saw that there had been a spill of 190-proof fuel alcoholcontained in a 6-inch-deep holding pond that was about 30 feet by 24 feet. An Iowa judge has denied unemployment benefits to a man who claimed discrimination after being fired from an ethanol plant for drinking "automobile fuel" produced by the company. According to Neddermeyer, he showed up for work and saw that there had been a spill of 190-proof fuel alcoholcontained in a 6-inch-deep holding pond that was about 30 feet by 24 feet. "I am a recovering alcoholic, and I thought about the availability of this alcohol throughout the day. Curious about the taste and its effects, I dipped into this lake of liquor …. The next thing I remember is waking up in the hospital.” His blood-alcohol level 0.72 almost double what is considered fatal for adults. At a subsequent state hearing, plant manager Jeff Bruck expressed shock. "This is a fuel alcohol," Bruck testified. "This is an explosive product.“ Neddermeyer argued that his employer shared in the responsibility for the incident because the spill at the plant provided an "opportunity" for him to drink. He also argued that Amaizing Energy was discriminating against him due to his "disease of alcoholism." At a subsequent state hearing, plant manager Jeff Bruck expressed shock. "This is a fuel alcohol," Bruck testified. "This is an explosive product.“ Neddermeyer argued that his employer shared in the responsibility for the incident because the spill at the plant provided an "opportunity" for him to drink. He also argued that Amaizing Energy was discriminating against him due to his "disease of alcoholism." He asked Hillary whether the protections afforded him under the Americans with Disabilities Act could be applied to his request for unemployment benefits. Hillary denied the request for benefits. "The employer has a right to expect employees not to drink the fuel," Des Moines Register 7.9.06

36 “Undue hardship” means significant difficulty or expense. “Undue hardship” means significant difficulty or expense. Not only financial difficulty Not only financial difficulty Those that would fundamentally alter the nature or operation of the business. Those that would fundamentally alter the nature or operation of the business. Every request for reasonable accommodation should be evaluated separately taking into account: Every request for reasonable accommodation should be evaluated separately taking into account: Nature and cost of the accommodation needed Nature and cost of the accommodation needed Overall financial resources of the business Overall financial resources of the business Number of persons employed by the business Number of persons employed by the business Impact of the accommodation on the business Impact of the accommodation on the business Undue Hardship

37 Record Keeping EEOC requires that employers keep all personnel records for one year after termination. EEOC requires that employers keep all personnel records for one year after termination. Written descriptions of benefits plans (such as pensions) and any seniority or merit system. Written descriptions of benefits plans (such as pensions) and any seniority or merit system. Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and the Equal Pay Act, require employers to keep payroll records for at least three years. Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and the Equal Pay Act, require employers to keep payroll records for at least three years. All records relevant to wages including wage rates, job evaluations, and seniority and merit systems. All records relevant to wages including wage rates, job evaluations, and seniority and merit systems.

38 Employment Information Report (EEO-1) EEO-1 survey is authorized by Title VII and the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972. EEO-1 survey is authorized by Title VII and the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972. All employers with 15 or more employees are required to keep employment records as. All employers with 15 or more employees are required to keep employment records as. Employers are required to file an EEO-1 report on an annual basis if they: Employers are required to file an EEO-1 report on an annual basis if they: Employ 100 or more employees Employ 100 or more employees Employ 50 or more employees and have Federal contracts totaling $50,000 or more. Employ 50 or more employees and have Federal contracts totaling $50,000 or more.

39 EEO vs. Affirmative Action Equal Employment Opportunity Equal Employment Opportunity Collection of laws that apply to all organizations Collection of laws that apply to all organizations Aimed at ending discrimination Aimed at ending discrimination Affirmative Action Affirmative Action Executive Order 11246 Executive Order 11246 Applies only to (1) government and contractors over $10,000 (2) court orders and (3) voluntary programs. Applies only to (1) government and contractors over $10,000 (2) court orders and (3) voluntary programs. NO affirmative action requirements for others. NO affirmative action requirements for others. Written document with targets for minority hiring. Written document with targets for minority hiring.

40 Enforcement Agencies Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)  All private employers with more than 15 employees  EEO – 1 for more than 100 employees Office Of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP)  Government contractors or sub-contractors.  Covers approximately 26 million or nearly 22% of the total civilian workforce.  OFCCP requires a contractor to engage in a self-analysis for the purpose of discovering any barriers to equal employment opportunity.  Investigates complaints of discrimination.

41 Affirmative Action Program (AAP) Develop a written program for each establishment Develop a written program for each establishment Identify potential problems in the participation and utilization of women and minorities. Identify potential problems in the participation and utilization of women and minorities. Gives the specific procedures and the good faith efforts to provide equal employment opportunity. Gives the specific procedures and the good faith efforts to provide equal employment opportunity. If there is underutilization, provides gives targets (not hard quotas) and timetables. If there is underutilization, provides gives targets (not hard quotas) and timetables. Expanded efforts in outreach, recruitment and training. Expanded efforts in outreach, recruitment and training.

42 AAP Statistics Flow Statistics Flow Statistics Examines selection rates by group Examines selection rates by group 4/5 th’s rule / Std. Deviation Rule 4/5 th’s rule / Std. Deviation Rule Availability and utilization analyses Availability and utilization analyses Employee distribution compared with local population Employee distribution compared with local population “Stock Statistics” “Stock Statistics” Concentration Statistics Concentration Statistics Examining placement of women and minorities by job category Examining placement of women and minorities by job category

43 Availability Analysis U.T. System determines minority availability by: The minority population in the surrounding labor market. The minority population in the surrounding labor market. The minority unemployment rate in the surrounding labor market. The minority unemployment rate in the surrounding labor market. The percentage of the minority workforce as compared with the total workforce in the surrounding labor market and Texas. The percentage of the minority workforce as compared with the total workforce in the surrounding labor market and Texas. The availability of promotable and transferable minorities within U. T. System Administration. The availability of promotable and transferable minorities within U. T. System Administration. http://www.eeoc.gov/stats/jobpat/2000/pmsa/2800.html http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/eeoindex.html

44 Utilization Analysis Compares the % percentage of minorities and women in each Job Group with the calculated % availability of minorities and women. Compares the % percentage of minorities and women in each Job Group with the calculated % availability of minorities and women. "Underutilized" is defined as having fewer than would reasonably be expected by their availability. "Underutilized" is defined as having fewer than would reasonably be expected by their availability. Job Category: Management Trainee Current Trainees Availability Non Minority Minority Minority 90%10%70%30%

45 Concentration Statistics

46 This all means…. Make sure that selection criteria are fair. Make sure that selection criteria are fair. Use validated selection tests. Use validated selection tests. Use the same procedure for all applicants. Use the same procedure for all applicants. Collect data and keep records. Collect data and keep records. Only ask job-related questions. Only ask job-related questions. No medical exams before making job offers. No medical exams before making job offers. No business is ever required to hire someone not qualified for a job. No business is ever required to hire someone not qualified for a job.

47 How to Proceed? What can companies do to navigate the differences between targets and preferences (which are legal) vs. quotas and reverse discrimination (which are illegal)? What can companies do to navigate the differences between targets and preferences (which are legal) vs. quotas and reverse discrimination (which are illegal)?


Download ppt "Legal Compliance MANA 5341 Staffing and Performance Management Staffing and Performance Management."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google