Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMichael McCormick Modified over 9 years ago
1
16.451 Lecture 19: The deuteron 13/11/2003 Basic properties: mass: mc 2 = 1876.124 MeV binding energy: (measured via -ray energy in n + p d + ) RMS radius: 1.963 0.004 fm (from electron scattering) quantum numbers: (lectures 13, 14) magnetic moment: = + 0.8573 N electric quadrupole moment: Q = + 0.002859 0.00030 bn ( the deuteron is not spherical!....) Basic properties: mass: mc 2 = 1876.124 MeV binding energy: (measured via -ray energy in n + p d + ) RMS radius: 1.963 0.004 fm (from electron scattering) quantum numbers: (lectures 13, 14) magnetic moment: = + 0.8573 N electric quadrupole moment: Q = + 0.002859 0.00030 bn ( the deuteron is not spherical!....) Important because: deuterium is the lightest nucleus and the only bound N-N state testing ground for state-of-the art models of the N-N interaction. 1
2
Because the deuteron has spin 1, there are 3 form factors to describe elastic scattering: the “charge” (G c ), “electric quadrupole” (G q ) and “magnetic (G M ) form factors. (JLab data) Because the deuteron has spin 1, there are 3 form factors to describe elastic scattering: the “charge” (G c ), “electric quadrupole” (G q ) and “magnetic (G M ) form factors. (JLab data) Electron scattering measurements: 2
3
Interpretation of quantum numbers: Of the possible quantum numbers, L = 0 has the lowest energy, so we expect the ground state to be L = 0, S = 1 (the deuteron has no excited states!) The nonzero electric quadrupole moment suggests an admixture of L = 2 (more later!) introduce Spectroscopic Notation: with naming convention: L = 0 is an S-state, L = 1 is a P-state, L = 2: D-state, etc... the deuteron configuration is primarily 3
4
Isospin and the N-N system: (recall lecture 13) The total wavefunction for two identical Fermions has to be antisymmetric w.r.to particle exchange: Central force problem: with symmetry (-1) L given by the spherical harmonic functions Spin and Isospin configurations: S = 0 and T = 0 are antisymmetric ; S = 1 and T = 1 are symmetric state can only be T = 0 ! 4
5
Understanding “L” -- the 2-body problem and orbital angular momentum: Classical Mechanics: CM set origin at the center of mass, and let the CM be fixed in space particles orbit the CM with angular speed Kinetic energy for each particle and angular momentum L = I : Total angular momentum: L = L 1 + L 2 with I = I 1 + I 2 Total kinetic energy: K = L 2 /2I 5
6
Equivalent one-body problem: CM Particles orbit the center of mass because of an attractive potential V(r) with no external force, particle kinematics are related in the CM system and the 2-body problem is equivalent to a 1-body problem: Total energy: Moment of inertia can be written: Note: L = total angular momentum of the 2-particle system. 6
7
Quantum mechanics version: H = total energy operator, E = eigenvalue) Angular derivatives define an orbital angular momentum operator: wave function in the relative coordinate has this generic form, where R(r) depends on V(r): Analog of L 2 /2 r 2 in the classical problem! lowest energy state has minimum total L! 7
8
Deuteron Magnetic Moment: d = 0.857 N In general, the magnetic moment is a quantum-mechanical vector; it must be aligned along the “natural symmetry axis” of the system, given by the total angular momentum: But we don’t know the direction of, only its “length” and z-component as expectation values: in a magnetic field, the energy depends on m J via Strategy: we will define the magnetic moment by its maximal projection on the z-axis, defined by the direction of the magnetic field, with m J = J Use expectation values of operators to calculate the result..... 8
9
Calculation of : Subtle point: we have to make two successive projections to evaluate the magnetic moment according to our definition, and the spin and orbital contributions enter with different weights. mJmJ 1. Project onto the direction of J: 2. Project onto the z-axis with m J = J: Next, we need to figure out the operator for 9
10
spin and orbital contributions: We already know the intrinsic magnetic moments of the proton and neutron, so these must correspond to the spin contributions to the magnetic moment operator: For the orbital part, there is a contribution from the proton only, corresponding to a circulating current loop (semiclassical sketch, but the result is correct) p I r For the deuteron, we want to use the magnetic moment operator: 10
11
Details: 1. because m n m p 2. L = 0 in the “S-state” ( 3 S 1 ) but we will consider also a contribution from the “D-state” ( 3 D 1 ) as an exercise 3. The proton and neutron couple to S = 1, and the deuteron has J = 1 Trick: use and write the operator as: But the proton and neutron spins are aligned, and so the second term has to give zero! 11
12
continued.... So, effectively we can write for the deuteron: Trick for expectation values: 12
13
Comparison to experiment: This is intermediate between the S-state and D-state values: Suppose the wave function of the deuteron is a linear combination of S and D states: Then we can adjust the coefficients to explain the magnetic moment: b 2 = 0.04, or a 4% D-state admixture accounts for the magnetic moment ! 13
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.