Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Sustainable urban transport Fred Lee Department of Geography The University of Hong Kong March 15, 2012.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Sustainable urban transport Fred Lee Department of Geography The University of Hong Kong March 15, 2012."— Presentation transcript:

1 Sustainable urban transport Fred Lee Department of Geography The University of Hong Kong March 15, 2012

2 Why reduce automobile dependence? How to reduce automobile dependence? What are automobile-dependent cities?

3 The automobile-dependent city The transit city The walking city 8,000 BC - mid 19 C 1,870s - 1,940s -

4 2.5 km

5 20-30 km

6 50-80 km

7 What are auto-dependent cities? ~ walking cities: 100-200 person/ hectare ~ transit cities: 70-100 person/ hectare ~ auto-dependent cities: 10-20 person/ hectare ~automobile-dependent city > automobile: priority in urban development & infrastructure investment > assumption: automobile use will predominate

8 What are auto-dependent cities? ~ high levels of private auto ownership > wealthy Asian cities: 88 cars per 1,000 person > European cities: 328 > Australian cities: 453 > US cities: 533 ~all three types can co-exist in one city [examples?]

9 Why automobile-dependent cities appear? ~support from int’l development assistance agencies ~national development programs (national car project) ~road agencies more powerful than transit agencies ~road agencies backed by powerful lobbies ~no single agency can promote comprehensive solution ~auto-dependent model: self-reinforcing

10 From “transit city” to “auto-dependent city”

11 From “cycling city” to “auto-dependent city”

12 Why need to reduce automobile dependence? ~environmental costs ~health costs ~economic costs ~social costs

13 Environmental costs ~air pollution ~noise ~greenhouse gases Health costs ~road traffic accidents: # 1 cause of young adult death ~# of people killed in traffic accidents each year? ~¾ of traffic accidents occur in LDCs

14 Economic costs ~traffic congestion  economic loss (billions of dollars) ~congestion  lose new investments ~lack public transport  high transport costs for poor > 20 % income; 3 – 4 hrs Social costs ~“transfer of costs”: from car users to whom? ~impact of public transport decline: gender biases? ~freeway construction destroys communities

15 How to reduce automobile dependence? ~invest in public transit infrastructure > encourage “walking cities” around transit stations ~provide space for walking & cycling > efficient, equitable & human form of transport ~land-use planning to limit low-density sprawl > encourage high-density urban communities ~resist auto dependence thru’ planning & control > priority: access to city services for all people

16 International Best Practice ~Bus rapid transit (BRT) (Curitiba, Brazil)

17 Challenge for Curitiba’s BRT ~how to minimize cost of public transit; & ~make it a viable alternative to private auto use

18 Express buses on exclusive busways

19 High-density residential development along axis

20 “Boarding tubes” cut boarding time

21 Platform same height as bus floors

22 Lessons from Curitiba?

23

24

25

26 Why automobile-dependent cities persist? ~automobile dependence: institutionalized > transportation priorities: automobiles > residential development priorities: low-density > cultural priorities: “ideal home” as a separate house

27 Why transportation priorities favor automobiles? ~transportation system: demand-responsive; not demand-management-oriented ~funding for road: economic, normal & necessary; $ for rail: uneconomic, outdated, unnecessary ~subsidy to automobiles: hidden; subsidy for transit: fully public ~ funding for road: government grants; $ for transit: special loans, private money ~transport agencies & planning agencies independent; no transited-oriented land use planning

28 Why residential development priorities favor auto? ~zoning regulations favor greenfield sites/ low density; gov’t planning resources commit to fringe areas ~infrastructure subsidies favor greenfield sites; redevelopment projects not supported ~lack of strategic planning to facilitate redevelopment; institutional framework does not integrate land-use planning and transport planning

29 Why cultural priorities favor automobiles? ~public aspire to the “ideal home”  other options: second-rate ~50s/60s: high-density projects neglect env quality  “density”: a bad image ~building bylaws: “space” = “health”  no regard for transport implications ~some city planners: countryside better than cities  they facilitate ex-urban development

30 Priorities in overcoming automobile-dependence in cities:

31 What is the future prospect of auto-dependent cities?


Download ppt "Sustainable urban transport Fred Lee Department of Geography The University of Hong Kong March 15, 2012."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google