Download presentation
1
NUPIC Organization Presented By Fawaz Jabali
NUPIC Region IV Representative Senior Engineer Arizona Public Service Company (APS) Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station August 28, 2006
2
What is NUPIC? Nuclear Procurement Issues Committee
Formed in 1989 as a result of the merger between the utility members of: Coordinating Agency for Supplier Evaluation (CASE) Nuclear Section Nuclear Supplier Quality Assurance Committee (NSQAC)
3
Mission NUPIC was established to provide:
Cooperative program for the evaluation of Supplier Performance Forum for discussion of Supplier Quality Assurance (QA) Issues Interface for Procurement QA activities
4
NUPIC Charter Defines the Organization Establishes Membership Criteria
Establishes Member Responsibilities Establishes Member Commitment Levels Requires 80% majority Vote to modify
5
Criteria for Participation
Membership in the NUPIC organization includes: Member: Utility/corporation that holds a nuclear operating license. Possession Only Member: Utility/corporation that holds a nuclear possession only license International Member: Utilities operating commercial nuclear facilities outside the USA
6
Overall Participation
Domestic utilities: 33 International utilities: 12 Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)
7
Organizational Structure
NUPIC consists of a designated representative from each member utility NUPIC is governed by a Steering Committee
8
Steering Committee Chairman: Sherry Grier (DPC)
Vice Chairman: Byron Lowery (SNC) Secretary/Treasurer: Conway Kehoe (DOM) Region I Rep. – Charlie Brown (PPL) Region II Rep. – Steve Lusk (TVA) Region III Rep. – Ken Pinkowski (AEP) Region IV Rep. – Fawaz Jabali (APS)
9
Steering Committee Charter
Defines the Responsibilities of: Chairman Vice Chairman Secretary Treasurer Regional Representatives Establishes Election Criteria & Terms of Office
10
Steering Committee Action Request
Audit problem not properly resolved Significant non-conformance Results from self-assessments Negative trend results
11
NUPIC Meeting Location determined by the Hosting Member
Meeting frequency (3 times per year) February (includes Auditor Training) June (includes Suppliers) October Attended by utility representatives, utility Management, NRC, EPRI, NEI, and Suppliers
12
Basis/Approach Audit checklist is based on 10CFR50 Appendix B requirements Audits & Surveys are conducted with an approved standardized checklist
13
Basis/Approach The Audit verifies effective implementation of the supplier’s QA program Audit frequency (12, 24, or 32 months) is based on supplier’s performance
14
Areas of Focus Evaluation of Suppliers who furnish:
Nuclear Safety Related Items and Services Commercial Grade Items (CGI) used in Nuclear Safety Related applications Nuclear Fuels Dry Cask Storage Containers
15
NUPIC Facts Secure website database for the joint Audit/Surveys information About 2000 Suppliers in the database by locations About 170 Audits/Surveys performed annually
16
NUPIC Process Members identify their suppliers in Database
Schedule Audits of suppliers with 5 users Solicit Supplier performance information from users prior to the audit
17
NUPIC Process Typical Audit teams include 1 team lead, auditors and 1 technical specialist Lead utility is responsible for posting of results and notification of major issues Lead utility is responsible for follow-up and closure of Audit issues
18
Auditor Requirements Audit Team Member (ATM)
Qualified lead auditor under their utility Completed at least one NUPIC audit under guidance Documented annual auditor recertification
19
Auditor Requirements Audit Team Leader (ATL)
Direct employee of domestic member company Qualified lead auditor under their utility Served as an ATM on one previous Audit Performed all functions of ATL under guidance Documented annual auditor recertification
20
Current Activities NRC Audit Observations
Vendor Performance Monitoring NUPIC Performance Monitoring Audit/Survey Checklist Improvements Procedure Review Working Group 2007 Self-Assessment Planning Long Range Planning
21
NUPIC Performance On-going Peer Reviews Independent Self-Assessment
Supplier Feedback NUPIC Team Evaluation Monitoring Process & Corrective Action
22
Standing Committees & Working Group Leads
Process Management – Jim Johns (FEC) NUPIC Performance – Darlene Stimart (NMC) Vendor Performance – John Larson (NPP) Vendor Interface – Earl Mayhorn (AUE)
23
Standing Committees & Working Group Leads
Information Technology - Mark Coren (DPC) Nuclear Fuel - Stan Mitchell (EXL) Long Range Planning – Bob McWey (SCE)
24
Standing Committees & Working Group Leads
Auditor Training – Tom Dougan (WCN) Audit Scheduling – John Simmons (TXU) Transportation Security – Mike Rose (PPL) Procedure Review – Ken Pinkowski (AEP)
25
Standing Committees & Working Group Leads
Vendor Performance Improvements: Jeff Baysinger (FPL) Bob McWey (SCE) Jeff Wright (ENT) Mark Coren (DPC)
26
Key benefits Industry-wide standardized approach
Diverse audit teams from different utilities Technical Specialist participation Sharing of industry issues Leverage resolution of supplier problems
27
Key benefits Quick database access to supplier audits
Quick ability to review and qualify suppliers Minimizing Operating & Maintenance costs Minimizing impact to supplier’s schedule Increased Nuclear regulatory confidence
28
NUPIC Organization QUESTIONS?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.