Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMarion Bradford Modified over 9 years ago
1
LLNL-PRES-672063 This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC 14 th International Conference on Nuclear Reaction Mechanisms, Varenna, Italy June 15, 2015
2
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES-672063 2 Funding by DOE/SC/NP – Applications of Nuclear Science and Technology (ARRA) Partially supported by DOE/NNSA Office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Research and Development Anna Hayes (LANL), Co-PI Andrii Chyzh (LLNL), most data analysis Roger Henderson (LLNL), target fabrication Collaborators: E. Kwan, J. Gostic (LLNL), J.L. Ullmann, A. Couture, T.A. Bredeweg, R.C. Haight, M. Jandel, H.Y. Lee, J. O’Donnell (LANL)
3
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES-672063 3 “Evidence for the stochastic aspect of prompt emission in spontaneous fission”, PRC 85, 02160(R) (2012) “Systematics of prompt -ray emission in fission”, PRC 87, 034620 (2013) “Total prompt -ray emission in fission of 235 U, 239,241 Pu, and 252 Cf”, PRC 90, 014602 (2014) “A compact gas-filled avalanche counter for DANCE”, NIM Phys. Res. A 694, 78 (2012)
4
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES-672063 4 Carried out in 2010 and 2011 at the Lujan Center of LANSCE using the DANCE array in conjunction with a parallel-plate avalanche counter (PPAC) Prompt ’s detected by DANCE in coincidence with the detection of fission fragments by PPAC for the neutron-induced fission in 235 U, 239,241 Pu with the E n from thermal to ~ 100 keV and the spontaneous fission in 252 Cf
5
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES-672063 5 DANCE (Detector for Advanced Neutron Capture Experiment) is highly segmented and highly efficient -ray calorimeter, consisting of 160 BaF 2 scintillators of equal volume equal- solid angle coverage PPAC designed jointly with LANL and fabricated in LLNL (Inclusive)(Fission)
6
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES-672063 6 Prompt rays (E ) 8 ns window set on the time spectrum between DANCE and PPAC ray detected by the BaF 2 scintillator without any adjacent one triggered 235 U(n,f) 241 Pu(n,f) Prompt total energy (E , tot ) Summed energy of all rays detected by DANCE within a time window of 40 ns Prompt multiplicity (M ) Derived by combining adjacent scintillators if triggered
7
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES-672063 7 Nearly -ray energy independence ( E = 150 keV – 10 MeV) Multiplicity response Detection efficiency ( 85 – 88%) Peak-to-total ratio (~ 55%) Unfolding possible One-dimension -ray energy and multiplicity distribution (iterative Bayesian and singular value decomposition methods) Two-dimension total -ray energy vs multiplicity distribution (iterative Bayesian method) Response matrix simulated numerically using GEANT4 (Measured) (Unfolded) 252 Cf (S.F.) (Brunson)
8
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES-672063 8 Results from both SVD and iterative Bayesian unfolding agree reasonably well Comparison with earlier results Our measurements systematically lower than those of earlier ones by Verbinski (1973) for E 4 MeV (Measured) (Bayesian) (SVD) 235 U(n,f) 239 Pu(n,f) (Verbinski)
9
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES-672063 9 Only iterative Bayesian method available Each grid point in the response matrix is a two-dimension matrix of the same dimension Simulated numerically using GEANT4 Resulting ~ 3,300 such matrices for the response matrix Each matrix varied as a single entity during the iteration (5 MeV, 5) (8 MeV, 10) Multiplicity Total energy
10
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES-672063 10 Mean and width of the projections increases noticeably 235 U(n,f) (Measured) (Unfolded) (Measured) (Unfolded)
11
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES-672063 11 M has a greater mean value and a broader distribution as the Z number of the fissile nucleus increases E , tot has no obvious systematic trend Nearly the same
12
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES-672063 12 ~ 5 – 7% difference between one and two-dimension unfolding < 5% uncertainty for M and similar uncertainty assumed for the E , tot M = 6.95 7.35 M = 7.50 7.93 M = 7.50 7.97 M = 8.16 8.75
13
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES-672063 13 Current E , tot consistently higher than previous measurements by ~ 20% for all fissile nuclei studied Current M consistently higher than previous measurements by ~ 10% except for the most recent ones Consistent with the evaluation made in ENDF/B-VII.1 [1] R. Billnert et al., PRC 87, 024601 (2013) [6] A. Oberstedt et al., PRC 87, 051602(R) (2013) [21] T.E. Valentine, Ann. Nucl. Energy 28, 191 (2001) (MeV)
14
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES-672063 14 Systematics of the prompt emission in fission for 235 U, 239,241 Pu, and 252 Cf has been studied using DANCE The prompt E , tot vs M was derived and unfolded to determine the physical one The E , tot and M distributions, projected from the 2-D spectrum, were measured for the first time E , tot is consistent with the value derived from a model-dependent analysis for 239 Pu [J. Ullmann et al., PRC 87, 044607 (2013)] However, they are about 20% higher than previous measured values using a single -ray detector for all fissile nuclei studied ? E ,tot = E M
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.