1. 1 Underground Asset Management Jonathan Mongie

2. 2 Asset Management ► Improved Asset Condition l Increased System Efficiency ► Prolonged Asset Life l Reduced Operating Costs and Optimized Capital Expenditures l Reduced Overall Life-Cycle Costs ► Reduced Risk of Environmental Non- Compliance l Improved Customer Services

3. 3 Asset Management Stages

4. 4 Typical Methods of Data Management: ► All Paper Survey Results and Work Orders Filed Away in a Cabinet or Binder. ► Video in difficult to use formats ► Most Data in the Heads of “Long-Term” Personnel

5. 5 Consequences of Old Methods ► Associating Survey Information with the Asset is Labor Intensive, thus Costly. ► No Effective Tools for Sorting and Querying Historical Data. ► High Risk of Actually Losing Important System Data at Any Moment:

6. 6 Master Plan GIS Flow Monitoring Outputs Hydraulic Conditions Hydraulic Model Software Inputs Field Attribute Collection System Expansion UGAM Database Preventative Maintenance Program Work Management Corrective Maintenance Program Predictive Maintenance Program Work/Status Management Reporting CCTV Software Camera Truck Mobile Applications Data Management

7. 7 Purpose Built Network Database

8. 8 Inventory of Assets ► From GIS or manhole inspections

9. 9 Data Validation ► Assess System Connectivity Situation

10. 10 Criticality Assessment – Impact of Failure ► “Impact of Failure” Query. l Personalized for the Individual Collection System (Highway Names, MH Depths, etc.). l Assigns Scores Depending on Proximity to Geospatial Areas of Interest (Water, Rail, Public Services, Bridges, Schools, etc.). l Then Sums Up the Scores and Sorts Critical Pipes and Manholes to Prioritize for Condition Assessment Surveys.

11. 11 Criticality Assessment – Impact of Failure

12. 12 CMMS/Work Planning

13. 13 Scheduling and Dispatch

14. 14 Field Mobile Application

15. 15 O&M Services for Sanitary and Storm ► CCTV data is collected using NASSCO standard PACP protocol ► Manhole inspections completed using NASSCO standard MACP protocol ► Sewer Cleaning ► Customer complaint response ► SSO data collection ► Repair and Replacement Services

16. 16 Condition Assessment

17. 17 Condition Assessment Pipe View

18. 18 SSES Services ► Smoke Testing ► Dye Testing ► Dye Flooding ► Flow Isolation ► Property Inspections ► Vacuum/Pressure Testing

19. 19 SSES Services – Smoke Testing

20. 20 Smoke Defect Observation

21. 21 Smoke Defect Observation

22. 22 Criticality Environmental Impact within 100' within 200' within 300' within 400' within 500' within 1000' within 100' within 200' within 300' within 400' within 500' (receiving Waters) Of water Supply Water Body 1009080706050403020101 PACP Structural Rating5500450400350300250200150100505 PACP Structural Rating440036032028024020016012080404 PACP Structural Rating33002702402101801501209060303 PACP Structural Rating2200180160140120100806040202 PACP Structural Rating11009080706050403020101

23. 23 Prioritization for Capital Planning

24. 24 Results – Eliminated 10% of Total Flow CITY OF TAUNTON, MASSACHUSETTS SUMMARY OF I/I REMOVAL VEOLIA - 2008 (gpd) VEOLIA - 2007 (gpd) VEOLIA - 2006 (gpd) PHASE 2 - 2006 (gpd) PHASE 1 - 2005 (gpd)TOTAL INFLOW41835052981527,36253,116108,2301,136,873 INFILTRATIO N 12154318713671,81772,317220,464673,277 TOTAL53989371695199,179125,432328,6941,810,149 Inflow calculated as 4.8 gpm per 1" diameter hole or volume as calculated based on 0.87 inches per hour based on a duration of 6 hrs (1730 gpd) Inflow for downspouts removed estimated at 1000 gpd Estimates per DEP's Guidelines for Performing, Infiltration/Inflow Analyses and Sewer System Evaluation Survey, Revised Jan 1993 (Table 7) I/I removed estimated at 4224 gpd/in/diam mile for line replaced or relined

25. 25 Combined Sewer Overflow Reduction

26. 26