1. A Private Charitable Trust Manage and Distribute Assets from a Natural Resource Damage Settlement

2. HISTORY LARGE PUMPED STORAGE HYDROELECTRIC FACILITY FEDERAL LICENSE AND STATE LEASE REQUIRED MEASURES TO PROTECT FISH

3. LUDINGTON PUMP STORAGE FACILITY

4. LEGAL ISSUES LARGE FISH KILLS NATIONAL/STATE CONSERVATION GROUPS - FERC AND IN FEDERAL COURT ACTIONS STATE FILED IN STATE COURT FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND INDIAN TRIBES CLAIMED DAMAGES

5. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT STATE COURT CONSENT AGREEMENT- CONTINGENT ON FERC SEASONAL NETS - REDUCE FISH LOSSES PAYMENTS FOR PAST AND FUTURE FISH LOSSES TRUST TO PROVIDE MITIGATION

6. WHY A PRIVATE TRUST? NUMEROUS LITIGANTS/CLAIMANTS CASH COMPONENT LARGE NO PARTY TO ACTION WILLING TO VEST SOLE CONTROL TO STATE OR FEDERAL AGENCY

7. WHAT IS THE TRUST? PRIVATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION COURT SETTLEMENT GUIDED BY BOARD AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT / TRUST INSTRUMENT GRANTS TO MITIGATE FISH LOSSES MANAGED BY A PRIVATE FIRM

8. Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians

9. SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY TEAM Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians Chippewa-Ottawa Treaty Fishery Management Authority Michigan Department of Natural Resources United States Fish and Wildlife Service Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians Michigan United Conservation Clubs National Wildlife Federation AND

10. GREAT LAKES FISHERY TRUST Basic Structure

11. SOURCE OF GRANT DOLLARS PAST DAMAGES TO FISH - 10,000 ACRES OF LAND + 10 MILLION DOLLARS ANNUAL PAYMENTS FOR FISH LOSSES (APPROX. 2.5 MILLION/YR) PAYMENTS UNTIL 2019 (FERC LICENSE PERIOD) CURRENT ASSETS ~ 25 MILLION

12. WHO CAN GET GRANTS? LOCAL GOVERNMENTS COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES NON-PROFITS (501c3) STATE & FEDERAL AGENCIES INDIAN TRIBES

13. FISHERIES RESEARCH REHABILITATION OF FISH POPULATIONS GREAT LAKES EDUCATION FISHERIES HABITAT RESTORATION FISHING ACCESS - GREAT LAKES SPECIAL PROJECTS TYPES OF GRANT PROJECTS

14. FISHERIES RESEARCH

15. POPULATION RESTORATION Lake Sturgeon Prototype Spiral Fish Ladder

16. EDUCATION Curriculum, Interpretive Programs, Displays

17. Great Lakes Shore Fishing Access

18. FISHING ACCESS Shore Fishing Facilities

19. SPECIAL PROJECTS –Control of Exotic Species Introductions –Sturgeon Research Conference –Watershed Initiative –Demonstration Dam Removal

21. SUMMARY $25 MILLION IN ASSETS $10 MILLION IN GRANTS (35 Projects) $4-$8 MILLION GRANTS / YEAR INCOME 2.5+ M/YR

22. GREAT LAKES FISHERY TRUST Functional Organization

23. RESPONSIBILITIES OF BOARD APPROVE SALE OF LANDS INVEST / MANAGE ASSETS MITIGATION GRANTS CONTRACT FOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES OTHER FIDUCIARY RESPONSIBILITIES

24. RESPONSIBILITIES OF SAT ADVISE THE GLFT –Grant requests –Land matters (conservation easements) –Strategic planning EXERCISE SEPARATE AUTHORITY –Calculating annual fish damages –Signing-off on FERC requirements –Investigate technologies to minimize fish losses

25. RESPONSIBILITIES OF MANAGER IMPLEMENT STRATEGIC PLAN MANAGE / SELL PROPERTIES SOLICIT / MANAGE GRANTS PROVIDE PUBLIC INFORMATION RECOMMEND POLICY / PROCEDURES RECOMMEND / IMPLEMENT MANAGEMENT CONTROLS

26. WHY DOES THE TRUST WORK? FINANCIAL SECURITY CLEAR MISSION BENEFICIARY PARTICIPATION ENFORCEABLE MANDATE STABILITY

27. FINANCIAL SECURITY INITIAL ASSETS HIGH ANNUAL PAYMENTS - SOURCE OF INCOME FOR 25 YEARS PRUDENT INVESTMENTS - OPPORTUNITY TO INCREASE ASSETS

28. CLEAR MISSION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT - PURPOSE TRUST INSTRUMENT - STRUCTURE / DECISION MAKING STRATEGIC PLAN SETS GOALS/OBJECTIVES

29. BENEFICIARY PARTICIPATION BENEFICIARIES - PEOPLE OF THE STATE WHO USE THE GREAT LAKES STAKEHOLDER ORGANIZATIONS MEMBERS OF THE BOARD / SAT PUBLIC INFORMED OF GLFT ACTIVITIES / FUNDING

30. LEGAL MANDATE ALL PLANTIFFS ON THE BOARD ALL PARTIES ON THE SAT SETTLEMENT ENFORCEABLE BY ANY PARTY INDEPENDENT OF STATE/FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

31. STABILITY GLFT IN PERPETUITY - MANAGED TO BE LIQUIDATED BY 2020 ASSETS MANAGED FOR LONG TERM STAFFING BASED UPON PROGRAM SIZE

32. PRIVATE TRUST APPROPRIATE LTS OF CONTAMINATED SITES? PRIVATE SITES WITH PRPs YES, PROVIDED –Sufficient funding –Clear purpose / legal mandate –Local stakeholder involvement/participation YES, FOR PRIVATE SITES WITH CERCA FUNDING –Same caveats

33. PRIVATE TRUST APPROPRIATE LTS OF CONTAMINATED SITES ? FOR DOE OR DOD SITES? PERHAPS, IF ISSUES CAN BE RESOLVED –Long Term Funding –Public Accountability vs Political Independence

34. CONCLUSIONS PRIVATE TRUSTS CAN PERFORM A VARIETY OF FUNCTIONS –OFTEN MORE EFFICIENT THAN GOV. –CAN BE MORE RESPONSIVE TO STAKEHOLDER CONCERNS –LESS SUBJECT TO PARTISAN OR ECONOMIC CONSTRAINTS –HAS LIMITATIONS