1. Classifying higher education institutions: why and how? EAIR Forum ‘Fighting for Harmony’, Vilnius 23-26 August 2009 Frans Kaiser Christiane Gaehtgens

2.  Diversity and transparency European Classification of HEIs  European classification of HEIs: dimensions and profiles  Implications and next steps

3.  The context of the project European Classification of HEIs  Description of the classification  Part two: the role of stakeholders in the process (Christiane)

4.  Diversity Diversity and transparency  Institutional /programme  Vertical /horizontal  Diversity is a strength…  …but it needs to be transparent

5.  Ranking  Classification Transparency instruments

6. Ranking

7. ranking

8. ranking

9. Ranking  1 overall score  Position on the list characterises HEI  Mainly research and prestige driven

10.  inclusive for all European HEIs  a posteriori information  multi-dimensional Classification Classification  non-hierarchical Transparency instruments

11.  Find the relevant characteristics  Organise the characteristics: six dimensions Classification

12. U-Map dimensions 1. Educational profile 2. Student profile 3. Research involvement 4. Involvement in knowledge transfer 5. International orientation 6. Regional orientation Classification

13.  Find the relevant characteristics  Organise the characteristics: six dimensions  Measure the characteristics: indicators Classification

14. Dimensions and indicators 1. Degree level focus 2. Subject areas covered 3. Program orientation focus Educational profile

15. Dimensions and indicators 1. Adult learners 2. Part-time students 3. Students in distance learning 4. Total enrolment (size) Student profile

16. Dimensions and indicators 1. Peer reviewed publications 2. PhD production 3. Expenditure on research 4. Time spent on research Research involvement

17. Dimensions and indicators 1. Patents 2. Licensing income 3. Start-up firms 4. Income from priv funded research contracts 5. Concerts, performances and exhibitions 6. Income from copyrighted products Involvement in knowledge transfer

18. Dimensions and indicators 1. Foreign degree seeking students 2. Exchange program students; incoming 3. Exchange program students; sent out 4. Income from international research programs 5. International academic staff 6. Importance of international sources of income International orientation

19. Dimensions and indicators 1. Importance of local/ regional sources of income 2. Academic staff time to community services 3. New entrants from the region 4. Graduates working in the region Regional orientation

20. Using the classification 1. On each dimension HEI is categorised in a descriptive category 2. User may select for each dimension the categories to be included 3. A selection of ‘comparable’ HEIs is presented Finding benchmark institutions

21. Using the classification Presenting an institutional profile

22. The data  Questionnaire based  Voluntary sample (67 HEIs)  Pre-filling to be explored Tentative results

23. What does a profile look like?

24. Results: tentative profiles

25. Case 54

26. Results: tentative profiles Case 27

27. Results: tentative profiles Case 66

28. Results: tentative profiles Case 59

29. Results: tentative profiles Case 57

30. Results: tentative profiles Case 55

31. Results: tentative profiles Case 18

32. A European Classification of Higher Education Institutions Thank you for your attention! Thank you for your attention! This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This presentation content reflects the views only of the author. The Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. www.u-map.eu www.u-map.eu The role of stakeholders in the process: Chistiane The role of stakeholders in the process: Chistiane

33. All profiles are equal but some are more equal then others Classification profiles and rankings Reflection

34. Reflection

35. Reflection Classification as a cradle in which ranking instruments are embedded