Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byOswin Owen Modified over 9 years ago
1
1 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 13 Building an Evidence-Based Nursing Practice
2
2 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Evidence-Based Practice Conscientious integration of best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values and needs in delivery of quality cost- effective health care Has a broader focus than research use Goal is implementation of quality cost- effective care to promote positive outcomes
3
3 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Barriers to EBP Practical Conceptual May create a “cookbook” approach to care
4
4 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Benefits to EBP Improved patient outcomes for patients, providers, and agencies Leads to best treatment (Gold Standard) plan An integral part of the Magnet Status process
5
5 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Evidence-Based Sources Systematic reviews Meta-analyses Integrative reviews Metasummaries Metasyntheses
6
6 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Developing Evidence-Based Practice for Nursing Findings from a study are different from research evidence. Research evidence is a synthesis of quality, relevant studies to form a body of empirical knowledge for selected area of practice.
7
7 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Synthesis of Research Findings Knowledge comes from quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research. Content clustering: integration of findings from scientifically sound research to determine what is currently known or not known Accomplished through: Integrative reviews Systematic reviews Meta-analyses, metasummaries, metasyntheses
8
8 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Integrative Reviews Identifies, analyzes, and synthesizes results from independent quantitative and qualitative studies to determine current knowledge Includes multiple types of research designs and literature types A complicated review, but gives breadth and depth to conclusions Annual Review of Nursing Research publishes integrative reviews.
9
9 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Qualitative Research Contributions to Integrative Reviews Identifies and refines questions and outcomes Identifies types of participants and interventions Augments and provides data for research synthesis Highlights inadequacies in methods Explains findings and interpretation of findings Helps make recommendations
10
10 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Systematic Reviews of Research A narrowly focused synthesis of research findings from quantitative studies Looks at studies of similar methodology Has same standards of clarity, rigor, and replication as primary research studies
11
11 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Steps in Systematic Reviews Formulate purpose and identify scope. Develop specific questions or hypotheses. Establish criteria for inclusion/exclusion of studies. Conduct extensive literature search of all sources. (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2005; Whittemore, 2005)
12
12 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Steps in Systematic Reviews (cont’d) Develop questionnaire and contact authors to gather data. Critique studies for scientific merit and data analysis. Analyze and interpret data. Report the review. (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2005; Whittemore, 2005)
13
13 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Meta-analyses of the Research Literature Statistically pools results from previous studies into single quantitative analysis Allows for application of scientific criteria For example, sample size, level of significance, variables
14
14 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Results of Meta-analysis A large, diverse sample that is more representative of target population Determination of overall significance of probability of pooled data Indication of the efficacy of the intervention from the average effect size determined from several quality studies Strength of relationship between variables
15
15 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Metasummaries in Qualitative Research Definition: a synthesis of multiple primary qualitative studies to produce a narrative about a selected phenomenon Expands our knowledge base
16
16 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Metasynthesis of Qualitative Research Synthesizes qualitative research with a critical analysis of primary studies and synthesis of findings into a new theory
17
17 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Best Evidence for Use in Practice The strength of the evidence is on a continuum from high-quality results to lower- quality results. Evidence-based guidelines are essential in developing evidence-based practice for nursing.
18
18 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Continuum of Strength of Research Evidence
19
19 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Strength of Evidence Strongest evidence 1. Meta-analysis 2. Integrative reviews 3. Experimental studies Weakest evidence 1. Descriptive surveys 2. Qualitative studies 3. Correlational studies 4. Quasi-experimental studies
20
20 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Stetler Model of Research Utilization Phase I: Preparation Phase II: Validation Phase III: Comparative Evaluation/Decision Making Phase IV: Translation/Application Phase V: Evaluation
21
21 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice Provides direction for development of evidence-based practice in an agency Looks at triggers for change, such as: Risk management data Financial data Organizational standards Philosophy of care
22
22 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice (cont’d)
23
23 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Application of the Iowa Model What are effective strategies for implementation? What are outcomes from using the research findings? Do the data support the change? Is the proposed change an agency priority?
24
24 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Scientific Merit Critique According to the Iowa model, research should be examined for: 1. Conceptualization and internal consistency of the study 2. Methodological rigor of the design, sample methods, data, and analysis 3. Generalizability of the findings 4. Number of replications
25
25 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Determining Agency Compatibility with the Change in Practice Who needs to approve the change in the agency? What steps are needed to get the change approved in the institution? Do physicians support the change? Do nurses support the change? Who are the leaders and will they support the change?
26
26 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Instituting the Change in Practice Will the implementation take a long time? What support is needed to make the change? Are there barriers to instituting change in the agency?
27
27 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Utilization Barriers Administration barriers Research not valued Limited change in agency or change not based on research Limited resources to make research-based change
28
28 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Utilization Barriers (cont’d) Clinician barriers Do not read research reports Lack education about research process Do not believe research findings Do not know how to implement findings
29
29 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Monitoring Outcomes After the change is effected, the outcomes must be monitored for effectiveness. Change should be documented regarding improved quality of care, decreased costs, saved nursing time, and improved access to care. Feedback is needed.
30
30 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. The Cochran Collaboration P – Population or participant of interest I – Intervention needed for practice C – Comparison of interventions to determine best practice O – Outcomes needed for practice
31
31 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Development of Evidence-Based Guidelines AHRQ helps with guidelines through development of an expert panel. The group designates the scope of the guidelines. They synthesize the findings to develop recommendations for practice. Guidelines developed are presented at meetings and published.
32
32 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Examples of AHRQ Practice Guidelines Pain management Decubiti prediction/prevention Cataract treatment in adults Depression treatment Screening, diagnosis, management of sickle cell disease in newborns and infants Otitis media treatment in children Availability of cardiac rehabilitation services
33
33 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Access to Evidence-Based Guidelines Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC) Academic Center for Evidence-Based Nursing American College of Physicians American Academy of Pediatrics
34
34 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Implementing a Model of Evidence- Based Practice Identify practice problem. Search for best research evidence. Determine quality of guideline by assessing: Authors Significance of problem Strength of evidence Link to national standards Cost-effectiveness of guideline
35
35 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Translational Research An evolving concept defined by the NIH as the translation of basic scientific discoveries into practical application Encouraged by nursing and medicine to increase the implementation of evidence- based interventions in practice and determine if these interventions are effective
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.