Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCamron Stephens Modified over 9 years ago
1
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme, Grant Agreement 284404. Follow up of powering schemes for IT, Q4 and D1/D2 M. Fitterer, R. De Maria, M. Giovannozzi Acknowledgments: G. Arduini, A. Ballarino, R. Bruce, J.-P. Burnet, E. McIntosh, F. Schmidt, H. Thiesen, E. Todesco and the LHC@Home volunteers
2
21 st HL-LHC TC, Powering schemes for inner triplet, Q4 and D1/D2, 16.04.2015 2 Outline 1.IT powering schemes: a. trim on Q1 b. scaling with β* 2.Update on tolerances from beam dynamics for D1/D2
3
21 st HL-LHC TC, Powering schemes for inner triplet, Q4 and D1/D2, 16.04.2015 3 Trim on Q1 Baseline powering scheme: proposed by WP3 (HL-LHC preliminary Design report) and presented by A. Ballarino, 4 th LHC Parameter and Layout Committee Q1-Q2a Q2b-Q3: proposed by S. Fartoukh -smallest tune shift for current control regime Q1 Q2a Q2b Q3 PC2 17.4 kA PC1 17.4 kA PC3 ±0.2 kA PC4 ±2.0 kA Q1 Q2a Q2b Q3 PC1 17.4 kA PC2 17.4 kA PC3 ±2.0 kA PC4 ±2.0 kA Q1 Q2a Q2b Q3 PC1 17.4 kA PC2 ±2.0 kAPC3 ±0.2 kAPC4 ±2.0 kA Q1-Q2-Q3: -slightly smaller tune shift than Q1-Q2a Q2b-Q3 for current control regime -best compensation voltage control regime => best scheme (for beam dynamics) Ok! PC4 ±2.0 kA move trim at Q3 to Q1 – better for β* measurement with k-modulation
4
21 st HL-LHC TC, Powering schemes for inner triplet, Q4 and D1/D2, 16.04.2015 current control – Baseline powering scheme: closed orbit distortion induced by uniformly distributed random error on current (±1ppm): Using 4 IT powering schemes – dependence on β* Baseline (1ppm) * β* [m]rms((Q z -Q z0 )) [10 -4 ]rms((Q z -Q z0 ))xβ* opt /β* round round0.15/0.151.37 flat0.075/0.301.981.71 sround0.10/0.102.05 sflat0.05/0.202.972.57 * 1 ppm of I max in table on slide 3 and for HLLHCV1.0 optics, β*=0.15/0.15 m
5
21 st HL-LHC TC, Powering schemes for inner triplet, Q4 and D1/D2, 16.04.2015 current control – comparison of powering schemes: closed orbit distortion induced by uniformly distributed random error on current (±1ppm): 5 IT powering schemes – dependence on β* * 1 ppm of I max in table on slide 3 and for HLLHCV1.0 optics, β*=0.15/0.15 m HL-LHC rms((Q z -Q z0 )) [10 -4 ] roundflatsroundsflat IT Baseline 1.371.982.052.97 IT Q1-Q2-Q3 0.670.981.031.46 IT Q1-Q2a Q2b-Q3 0.550.790.831.19 HL-LHC ΔQ z,rms /ΔQ z,rms (IT Baseline) roundflatsroundsflat IT Baselinex1.0 IT Q1-Q2-Q3x0.5 IT Q1-Q2a Q2b-Q3x0.4
6
21 st HL-LHC TC, Powering schemes for inner triplet, Q4 and D1/D2, 16.04.2015 voltage control – comparison of powering schemes: closed orbit distortion induced by uniformly distributed random error on current (±1ppm): 6 IT powering schemes – dependence on β* * 1 ppm of I max in table on slide 3 and for HLLHCV1.0 optics, β*=0.15/0.15 m HL-LHC max((Q z -Q z0 )) [10 -6 ], f=50 Hz roundflatsroundsflat IT Baseline 1.151.431.722.14 IT Q1-Q2-Q3 0.550.680.821.02 IT Q1-Q2a Q2b-Q3 1.101.371.652.05 HL-LHC ΔQ z,max /ΔQ z,max (IT Baseline) roundflatsroundsflat IT Baselinex1.00 IT Q1-Q2-Q3x0.48 IT Q1-Q2a Q2b-Q3x0.96
7
21 st HL-LHC TC, Powering schemes for inner triplet, Q4 and D1/D2, 16.04.2015 current control: closed orbit distortion induced by uniformly distributed random error on current (±1ppm) – trims not taken into account but expected to be negligible: 7 D1/D2 powering schemes class 1 (1ppm) *rms((z-z 0 )) at IP [μm]rms((Q z -Q z0 )) [10 -4 ] D1L-D2L-D1R-D2R 0.0400.027 D1LD2L-D1RD2R 0.0150.010 D1LD2LD1RD2R 0.0110.013 * 1 ppm of I max in table on slide 3 and for HLLHCV1.0 optics, β*=0.15/0.15 m D2L D1L D1R D2R D2L D1L D1R D2R D1L-D2L-D1R-D2R D2L D1L D1R D2R D1LD2L-D1RD2RD1LD2LD1RD2R - better in terms of orbit deviation and tune shift - D1LD2L-D1RD2R and D1LD2LD1RD2R are equivalent worse in terms of orbit deviation and tune shift main PCtrim PC
8
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme, Grant Agreement 284404. Thank you for your attention!
9
21 st HL-LHC TC, Powering schemes for inner triplet, Q4 and D1/D2, 16.04.2015 9 Tolerances Voltage Control Regime (2) current control “determination of the dangerous frequencies” (orange bar) “frequency spectrum” (orange line) Voltage control Q1Q2a Q2bQ3 line superimposed over Baseline ** for SixTrack slhcv31b x1 the IT magnet parameters from 17.02.2014 (e.g. L Q1/Q2/Q3 =10.8 mH/m), the baseline powering scheme and L tot,circuit =L Q1 =L Q3 =L Q2a =L Q2b tune shift: layout HLLHCV1.1, β*=0.15/0.15 m, magnet parameters see slide 5 ** tolerance: minimum limit over all beam constellations with only IT ripple
10
21 st HL-LHC TC, Powering schemes for inner triplet, Q4 and D1/D2, 16.04.2015 10 Tolerances Voltage Control Regime Q1Q2a Q2bQ3 line superimposed over Baseline Baseline + Q4 superimposed over SixTrack slhcv31b x1 due to its small inductance Q4 contributes as much as the IT in the voltage control regime PS, f=50 HzΔQ(Q4)/ΔQ(PS) Baseline0.68 Q1-Q2-Q31.41 Q1-Q2a Q2b-Q30.71 SixTrack slhcv31b x10.49 tune shift: layout HLLHCV1.1, β*=0.15/0.15 m, magnet parameters see slide 5 tolerance: minimum limit over all beam constellations with only IT ripple
11
21 st HL-LHC TC, Powering schemes for inner triplet, Q4 and D1/D2, 16.04.2015 Option to use a trim for one of the Q4 apertures instead of powering each aperture individually: assume: k=const * I with const = k max /(15.65 kA) with k max =(115 T/m)/Brho(7 TeV) and assume trim for Beam 2 aperture: I B2 =I B1 +I trim -> minimum 2 kA trim necessary for the present optics (which is not the final one) 11 Imbalance Q4 apertures Promising idea, but: -The whole squeeze sequence from the pre-squeeze β* to the VDM to has to be re-evaluated for new layout -imbalance between apertures has to be evaluated for alignment optics (to be developed)
12
21 st HL-LHC TC, Powering schemes for inner triplet, Q4 and D1/D2, 16.04.2015 from WP3 page 31/03/2015 * values scaled from 132.6 T/m gradient to 140 T/m gradient for HLLHCV1.1 optics version (16.47x140/132.6 kA =17.4 kA) 12 Magnet parameters Q1/Q3Q2a/Q2bQ4D1D2 length [m] 2x4.06.83.836.277.78 I max [kA] 17.4 *15.56 12 I [kA] (T itok ) 11.812.0 B (T ItoB ) 140 T/m115 T/m6.6 T5.1 T L [mH/m] 8.210.774.013.51 R [mΩ] 1.144
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.