1. AGIS 2004 EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 1 The European Arrest Warrant Project A short overview of Project JAI/2004/AGIS/043

2. AGIS 2004 2 EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 Introduction Recognition of existence of a single law enforcement area Recognition of existence of a single law enforcement area  Area of Freedom, Security and Justice Enhancement of judicial cooperation in criminal matters. Enhancement of judicial cooperation in criminal matters. Replace within Europe with open borders existing extradition procedures by surrender procedures Replace within Europe with open borders existing extradition procedures by surrender procedures Introduce “new approach” of mutual recognition based on mutual trust Introduce “new approach” of mutual recognition based on mutual trust Establish direct contacts between “issuing” and “executing” judicial authorities; end involvement of administration Establish direct contacts between “issuing” and “executing” judicial authorities; end involvement of administration

3. AGIS 2004 3 EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 Introduction Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States. Part of a general programme to implement mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal matters Part of a general programme to implement mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal matters Implementation accelerated following events of 11 September 2001 Implementation accelerated following events of 11 September 2001

4. AGIS 2004 4 EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 Introduction Explicit objectives of the Framework Decision: Expedition and simplification of extradition procedures Expedition and simplification of extradition procedures (max. 90 days duration) Establishment of direct contacts between judicial authorities Establishment of direct contacts between judicial authorities Introduction of standard form to obtain surrender Introduction of standard form to obtain surrender  The European Arrest Warrant Suppression of double criminality requirement for 32 categories of crimes Suppression of double criminality requirement for 32 categories of crimes

5. AGIS 2004 5 EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 Introduction Implicit objectives of the Framework Decision: Reduce involvement of national politicians Reduce involvement of national politicians Trust in common level of human rights protection in all Trust in common level of human rights protection in all Member States Abolition of the nationality exception Abolition of the nationality exception

6. AGIS 2004 6 EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 The EAW Project “Triggers” for the project: Framework Decision Framework Decision Handbook European Arrest Warrant Handbook European Arrest Warrant Specific problems addressed by the project: Framework Decision is first instrument to apply the principle of mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal matters Framework Decision is first instrument to apply the principle of mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal matters Radical change in judicial cooperation due to mutual recognition Radical change in judicial cooperation due to mutual recognition Status and enforcement of third pillar legislation Status and enforcement of third pillar legislation

7. AGIS 2004 7 EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 Project partners JUSTICE, London JUSTICE, London Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law, Freiburg Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law, Freiburg Faculty of Law, University of Lund, Lund Faculty of Law, University of Lund, Lund European Criminal Bar Association (ECBA), London/Maastricht European Criminal Bar Association (ECBA), London/Maastricht Amsterdam Centre for International Law (University of Amsterdam), Amsterdam Amsterdam Centre for International Law (University of Amsterdam), Amsterdam Ministry of Justice of Romania, Bucharest Ministry of Justice of Romania, Bucharest T.M.C. Asser Instituut, The Hague T.M.C. Asser Instituut, The Hague Centre of Information Services for MP ’ s of the National Library of Estonia, Tallinn Centre of Information Services for MP ’ s of the National Library of Estonia, Tallinn

8. AGIS 2004 8 EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 Project supporters & experts Supporters: Eurojust, The Hague Eurojust, The Hague International Association of Prosecutors, The Hague International Association of Prosecutors, The Hague Association Internationale de Droit Penal, Vienna Association Internationale de Droit Penal, Vienna Centre of Research in Criminal Sciences Fernand Boulan, Aix- en-Provence Centre of Research in Criminal Sciences Fernand Boulan, Aix- en-ProvenceExperts: Active network of experts in 24 out of 25 Member States (exception: Malta) plus: Active network of experts in 24 out of 25 Member States (exception: Malta) plus: Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia, Norway and Switzerland. Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia, Norway and Switzerland.

9. AGIS 2004 9 EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 Project objectives (1) Set up network of experts in Member States, provide project with systematic analysis of implementation of Framework Decision on European Arrest Warrant, relevant national case law, and practice Set up network of experts in Member States, provide project with systematic analysis of implementation of Framework Decision on European Arrest Warrant, relevant national case law, and practice Present systematic overview (in English) of relevant national (implementation) legislation and practice in Member States, candidate countries, and Schengen partners Present systematic overview (in English) of relevant national (implementation) legislation and practice in Member States, candidate countries, and Schengen partners Create platform for discussion and exchange of information Create platform for discussion and exchange of information

10. AGIS 2004 10 EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 Project objectives (2) Increase knowledge regarding Increase knowledge regarding  implementation of the Framework decision on the European Arrest Warrant in the Member States  preparations in candidate countries  relations with Schengen partners (esp. Norway, Iceland) Increase knowledge regarding functioning of surrender procedures based on European Arrest Warrant in the 25 Member States Increase knowledge regarding functioning of surrender procedures based on European Arrest Warrant in the 25 Member States

11. AGIS 2004 11 EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 Project means Acquisition and publication of relevant legislation, official documents, case law, articles and commentaries Acquisition and publication of relevant legislation, official documents, case law, articles and commentaries Send out standard Questionnaire to correspondents, resulting in country reports Send out standard Questionnaire to correspondents, resulting in country reports Provide standard form for reporting and publishing of case law Provide standard form for reporting and publishing of case law Provide tools for comparative law analysis Provide tools for comparative law analysis

12. AGIS 2004 12 EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 Project results Website www.eurowarrant.net with: www.eurowarrant.net Country-reports received from 19 out of 25 Member States Country-reports received from 19 out of 25 Member States National implementation legislation for 25 Member States National implementation legislation for 25 Member States Official documents Official documents Case law from several Member States and the European Court of Justice Case law from several Member States and the European Court of Justice Articles and commentaries Articles and commentaries

13. AGIS 2004 13 EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 General observations (1) Surrender procedures based on a European Arrest Warrant are in place in 24 out of 25 Member States Surrender procedures based on a European Arrest Warrant are in place in 24 out of 25 Member States In some Member States constitutional issues have arisen, resulting in necessary changes of the Constitution or annulment of national implementation legislation In some Member States constitutional issues have arisen, resulting in necessary changes of the Constitution or annulment of national implementation legislation In practice executing judicial authorities in certain Member States varify whether box was correctly ticked In practice executing judicial authorities in certain Member States varify whether box was correctly ticked

14. AGIS 2004 14 EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 General observations (2) Two main goals of Framework decision on the European Arrest Warrant, that is to Two main goals of Framework decision on the European Arrest Warrant, that is to  Simplify procedures  Expedite procedures prove a success with average duration of procedure reduced from 9 months to 1,5 months Some Member States limit the scope of sensitive list items. For instance, no surrender for ‘murder’ in case of abortion. Some Member States limit the scope of sensitive list items. For instance, no surrender for ‘murder’ in case of abortion.

15. AGIS 2004 15 EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 General observations (3) Direct contacts between judicial authorities but administration seems to remain involved in certain Member States at least Direct contacts between judicial authorities but administration seems to remain involved in certain Member States at least The double criminality requirement is abolished in the legislation of most Member States The double criminality requirement is abolished in the legislation of most Member States In practice however, a double criminality check is reintroduced regarding nationals and maintained for sensitive list items In practice however, a double criminality check is reintroduced regarding nationals and maintained for sensitive list items

16. AGIS 2004 16 EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 General observations (4) The legislation and practice of certain Member States suggest less than unconditional trust in the warranting of human rights in the requesting Member State The legislation and practice of certain Member States suggest less than unconditional trust in the warranting of human rights in the requesting Member State There now exists an almost complete collection of documents and information, including some otherwise sometimes very difficult to find There now exists an almost complete collection of documents and information, including some otherwise sometimes very difficult to find

17. AGIS 2004 17 EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 Tendencies & Expectations Problems remain but in general the EAW procedure is functioning Problems remain but in general the EAW procedure is functioning Second Commission report on the implementation of the Framework Decision expected this month Second Commission report on the implementation of the Framework Decision expected this month The project website will be maintained and updated, also after project ends The project website will be maintained and updated, also after project ends New proposal made under AGIS 2006. Builds on existing project, continued collaboration with network of experts New proposal made under AGIS 2006. Builds on existing project, continued collaboration with network of experts > new proposal will be “real” research project

18. AGIS 2004 18 EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 The European Arrest Warrant - The Reality of a Vision 16 & 17 June 2006