1. 2/6/01USC - Center for Software Engineering 1 Marrying Software Architecture with Configuration Management Techniques Roshanak Roshandel roshande@usc.edu ARR February 2001

2. 2/6/01USC - Center for Software Engineering 2 Background Software Architecture Elements Components, connectors, configurations, architectural style, architecture description languages (ADL), subtyping Configuration Management Elements Change management at source code level, versioned archive, revisions, locks, branches, version tree, system models, configurations

3. 2/6/01USC - Center for Software Engineering 3 Scenario Word Processor develops Architecture Design Implementation

4. 2/6/01USC - Center for Software Engineering 4 Architecture System Model Based on software architecture concepts ADL and style independent Component, connector, and interface types Component, connector, and interface instances Versioning types to capture architectural evolution

5. 2/6/01USC - Center for Software Engineering 5 System Model Name, Revision, Representation, Ascendant, Descendant, Interface instances, Component instances, Connector instances, Behaviors, Constraints, Subtype, Style ComponentType ConnectorType Name Direction InterfaceType InterfaceInstance Name ComponentType | VariantComponentType ComponentInstance Name Source Interface Destination Interface ConnectorType VariantConnectorType ConnectorInstance VariantComponentType VariantConnectorType Name Revision Representation Ascendant Descendant InterfaceType Name Revision VariantPropertyName Ascendant Descendant Subtype VariantComponentType

6. 2/6/01USC - Center for Software Engineering 6 Mae Architectural evolution environment Instance of the generic system model Mapping onto C2SADEL ADL

7. 2/6/01USC - Center for Software Engineering 7 Implementation Mae Dradel Ménage Expansion and loose integration Environment for supporting architecture based evolution Graphical environment for specifying versioned software architecture

8. 2/6/01USC - Center for Software Engineering 8 Example Application

9. 2/6/01USC - Center for Software Engineering 9 Mae

10. 2/6/01USC - Center for Software Engineering 10 Spell Checker Name = tSpellChecker Revision = 2 Interface = { iSpellCheck } Component = { iTokenizer, iResultCollector} Connector = { iC2bus1, iC2bus3 } Behavior = { iSpellCheck* } Constraint = { } Representation = { > } Ascendant = { tSpellChecker 1 } Descendant = {tSpellChecker 3} Style = { C2 } SubType = { beh \and int } Name = tSpellChecker Revision = 3 Interface = { iSpellCheck } Component = { iTokenizer, iResultCollector, iStatistics, collectStatistics, true } Connector = { iC2bus1, iC2bus2, collectStatistics, true, iC2bus3 } Behavior = { iSpellCheck* } Constraint = { } Representation = { > } Ascendant = { tSpellChecker 2 } Descendant = { } Style = { C2 } SubType = { beh \and int }

11. 2/6/01USC - Center for Software Engineering 11 Benefits of Mae Automated change script generation Architectural level patches Subtyping relationship to suggest candidate versions of components for replacement Multi-version connectors Reliable component upgrade

12. 2/6/01USC - Center for Software Engineering 12 Future work Additional design-time functionality for evolving architectural elements Tight integration of development-time architectural evolution with the evolution of a deployed system, at run-time Enhancing the Mae environment

13. 2/6/01USC - Center for Software Engineering 13 Acknowledgement Andre van der Hoek Marija Rakic Roshanak Roshandel Nenad Medvidovic Additional information: “ Taming Architectural Evolution”, Andre van der Hoek, Marija Rakic, Roshanak Roshandel, Nenad Medvidovic Technical Report: USC-CSE-2000-523