Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAllan McDaniel Modified over 9 years ago
1
Statistics (cont.) Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
2
Announcements Journal Summary 2 assignment Due in class this week (Wednesday, Nov. 13 th ) Group projects Plan to have your analyses done before Thanksgiving break, GAs will be available during lab times to help Poster sessions are last lab sections of the semester (last week of classes), so start thinking about your posters. I will lecture about poster presentations on Monday (a week from today).
3
Samples and Populations 2 General kinds of Statistics Descriptive statistics Used to describe, simplify, & organize data sets Describing distributions of scores Inferential statistics Used to test claims about the population, based on data gathered from samples Takes sampling error into account. Are the results above and beyond what you’d expect by random chance? Sample Inferential statistics used to generalize back Population
4
Statistics 2 General kinds of Statistics Descriptive statistics Used to describe, simplify, & organize data sets Describing distributions of scores Inferential statistics Used to test claims about the population, based on data gathered from samples Takes sampling error into account. Are the results above and beyond what you’d expect by random chance? Sample Inferential statistics used to generalize back Population
5
Inferential Statistics Purpose: To make claims about populations based on data collected from samples What’s the big deal? Example Experiment: Group A - gets treatment to improve memory Group B - gets no treatment (control) After treatment period test both groups for memory Results: Group A’s average memory score is 80% Group B’s is 76% Is the 4% difference a “real” difference (statistically significant) or is it just sampling error? Example Experiment: Group A - gets treatment to improve memory Group B - gets no treatment (control) After treatment period test both groups for memory Results: Group A’s average memory score is 80% Group B’s is 76% Is the 4% difference a “real” difference (statistically significant) or is it just sampling error? Population Sample A Treatment X = 80% Sample B No Treatment X = 76%
6
Testing Hypotheses Step 2: Set your decision criteria Step 3: Collect your data from your sample(s) Step 4: Compute your test statistics Step 5: Make a decision about your null hypothesis “Reject H 0 ” “Fail to reject H 0 ” Step 1: State your hypotheses
7
Testing Hypotheses Step 1: State your hypotheses “There are no differences (effects)” Generally, “not all groups are equal” You aren’t out to prove the alternative hypothesis (although it feels like this is what you want to do) If you reject the null hypothesis, then you’re left with support for the alternative(s) (NOT proof!) This is the hypothesis that you are testing Null hypothesis (H 0 ) Alternative hypothesis(ses) (H A )
8
Testing Hypotheses Step 1: State your hypotheses In our memory example experiment Null H 0 : mean of Group A = mean of Group B Alternative H A : mean of Group A ≠ mean of Group B (Or more precisely: Group A > Group B) It seems like our theory is that the treatment should improve memory. That’s the alternative hypothesis. That’s NOT the one the we’ll test with inferential statistics. Instead, we test the H 0 In our memory example experiment Null H 0 : mean of Group A = mean of Group B Alternative H A : mean of Group A ≠ mean of Group B (Or more precisely: Group A > Group B) It seems like our theory is that the treatment should improve memory. That’s the alternative hypothesis. That’s NOT the one the we’ll test with inferential statistics. Instead, we test the H 0
9
Testing Hypotheses Step 2: Set your decision criteria Your alpha level will be your guide for when to: “reject the null hypothesis” “fail to reject the null hypothesis” Step 1: State your hypotheses This could be correct conclusion or the incorrect conclusion Two different ways to go wrong Type I error: saying that there is a difference when there really isn’t one (probability of making this error is “alpha level”) Type II error: saying that there is not a difference when there really is one
10
Error types Real world (‘truth’) H 0 is correct H 0 is wrong Experimenter’s conclusions Reject H 0 Fail to Reject H 0 Type I error Type II error
11
Error types: Courtroom analogy Real world (‘truth’) Defendant is innocent Jury’s decision Find guilty Type I error Type II error Defendant is guilty Find not guilty
12
Error types Type I error ( α ): concluding that there is an effect (a difference between groups) when there really isn’t. Sometimes called “significance level” We try to minimize this (keep it low) Pick a low level of alpha Psychology: 0.05 and 0.01 most common Type II error (β): concluding that there isn’t an effect, when there really is. How likely are you able to detect a difference if it is there Related to the Statistical Power of a test
13
Testing Hypotheses Step 3: Collect your data from your sample(s) Step 4: Compute your test statistics Descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations, etc.) Inferential statistics (t-tests, ANOVAs, etc.) Step 5: Make a decision about your null hypothesis Reject H 0 “statistically significant differences” Fail to reject H 0 “not statistically significant differences” Step 1: State your hypotheses Step 2: Set your decision criteria
14
Statistical significance “Statistically significant differences” When you “reject your null hypothesis” Essentially this means that the observed difference is above what you’d expect by chance “Chance” is determined by estimating how much sampling error there is Factors affecting “chance” Sample size Population variability
15
Sampling error n = 1 Population mean x Sampling error (Pop mean - sample mean) Population Distribution
16
Sampling error n = 2 Population mean x Population Distribution x Sampling error (Pop mean - sample mean) Sample mean
17
Sampling error n = 10 Population mean Population Distribution Sampling error (Pop mean - sample mean) Sample mean x x x x x x x x x x Generally, as the sample size increases, the sampling error decreases
18
Sampling error Typically the narrower the population distribution, the narrower the range of possible samples, and the smaller the “chance” Small population variability Large population variability
19
Sampling error These two factors combine to impact the distribution of sample means. The distribution of sample means is a distribution of all possible sample means of a particular sample size that can be drawn from the population XAXA XBXB XCXC XDXD Population Samples of size = n Distribution of sample means Avg. Sampling error “chance” More info
20
Significance “A statistically significant difference” means: the researcher is concluding that there is a difference above and beyond chance with the probability of making a type I error at 5% (assuming an alpha level = 0.05) Note “statistical significance” is not the same thing as theoretical significance. Only means that there is a statistical difference Doesn’t mean that it is an important difference
21
Non-Significance Failing to reject the null hypothesis Generally, not interested in “accepting the null hypothesis” (remember we can’t prove things only disprove them) Usually check to see if you made a Type II error (failed to detect a difference that is really there) Check the statistical power of your test Sample size is too small Effects that you’re looking for are really small Check your controls, maybe too much variability
22
Summary to this point Real world (‘truth’) H 0 is correct H 0 is wrong Experimenter’s conclusions Reject H 0 Fail to Reject H 0 Type I error Type II error Example Experiment: Group A - gets treatment to improve memory Group B - gets no treatment (control) After treatment period test both groups for memory Results: Group A’s average memory score is 80% Group B’s is 76% Example Experiment: Group A - gets treatment to improve memory Group B - gets no treatment (control) After treatment period test both groups for memory Results: Group A’s average memory score is 80% Group B’s is 76% XAXA XBXB 76%80% Is the 4% difference a “real” difference (statistically significant) or is it just sampling error? Two sample distributions H 0 : there is no difference between Grp A and Grp B H 0 : μ A = μ B About populations
23
“Generic” statistical test Tests the question: Are there differences between groups due to a treatment? One population Real world (‘truth’) H 0 is correct H 0 is wrong Experimenter’s conclusions Reject H 0 Fail to Reject H 0 Type I error Type II error H 0 is true (no treatment effect) XAXA XBXB 76%80% Two possibilities in the “real world” Two sample distributions
24
“Generic” statistical test XAXA XBXB XAXA XBXB H 0 is true (no treatment effect) H 0 is false (is a treatment effect) Two populations Real world (‘truth’) H 0 is correct H 0 is wrong Experimenter’s conclusions Reject H 0 Fail to Reject H 0 Type I error Type II error 76%80% 76%80% People who get the treatment change, they form a new population (the “treatment population) People who get the treatment change, they form a new population (the “treatment population) Tests the question: Are there differences between groups due to a treatment? Two possibilities in the “real world”
25
“Generic” statistical test XBXB XAXA Why might the samples be different? (What is the source of the variability between groups)? ER: Random sampling error ID: Individual differences (if between subjects factor) TR: The effect of a treatment
26
“Generic” statistical test The generic test statistic - is a ratio of sources of variability Observed difference Difference from chance = TR + ID + ER ID + ER = Computed test statistic XBXB XAXA ER: Random sampling error ID: Individual differences (if between subjects factor) TR: The effect of a treatment
27
Sampling error The distribution of sample means is a distribution of all possible sample means of a particular sample size that can be drawn from the population XAXA XBXB XCXC XDXD Population Samples of size = n Distribution of sample means Avg. Sampling error “chance”
28
“Generic” statistical test The generic test statistic distribution To reject the H 0, you want a computed test statistics that is large reflecting a large Treatment Effect (TR) What’s large enough? The alpha level gives us the decision criterion Distribution of the test statistic α-level determines where these boundaries go Distribution of sample means Test statistic TR + ID + ER ID + ER
29
“Generic” statistical test Distribution of the test statistic Reject H 0 Fail to reject H 0 The generic test statistic distribution To reject the H 0, you want a computed test statistics that is large reflecting a large Treatment Effect (TR) What’s large enough? The alpha level gives us the decision criterion
30
“Generic” statistical test Distribution of the test statistic Reject H 0 Fail to reject H 0 The generic test statistic distribution To reject the H 0, you want a computed test statistics that is large reflecting a large Treatment Effect (TR) What’s large enough? The alpha level gives us the decision criterion “One tailed test”: sometimes you know to expect a particular difference (e.g., “improve memory performance”)
31
“Generic” statistical test Things that affect the computed test statistic Size of the treatment effect The bigger the effect, the bigger the computed test statistic Difference expected by chance (sample error) Sample size Variability in the population
32
Significance “A statistically significant difference” means: the researcher is concluding that there is a difference above and beyond chance with the probability of making a type I error at 5% (assuming an alpha level = 0.05) Note “statistical significance” is not the same thing as theoretical significance. Only means that there is a statistical difference Doesn’t mean that it is an important difference
33
Non-Significance Failing to reject the null hypothesis Generally, not interested in “accepting the null hypothesis” (remember we can’t prove things only disprove them) Usually check to see if you made a Type II error (failed to detect a difference that is really there) Check the statistical power of your test Sample size is too small Effects that you’re looking for are really small Check your controls, maybe too much variability
34
Some inferential statistical tests 1 factor with two groups T-tests Between groups: 2-independent samples Within groups: Repeated measures samples (matched, related) 1 factor with more than two groups Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) (either between groups or repeated measures) Multi-factorial Factorial ANOVA
35
T-test Design 2 separate experimental conditions Degrees of freedom Based on the size of the sample and the kind of t-test Formula: T = X 1 - X 2 Diff by chance Based on sample error Observed difference Computation differs for between and within t-tests
36
T-test Reporting your results The observed difference between conditions Kind of t-test Computed T-statistic Degrees of freedom for the test The “p-value” of the test “The mean of the treatment group was 12 points higher than the control group. An independent samples t-test yielded a significant difference, t(24) = 5.67, p < 0.05.” “The mean score of the post-test was 12 points higher than the pre-test. A repeated measures t-test demonstrated that this difference was significant significant, t(12) = 5.67, p < 0.05.”
37
Analysis of Variance Designs More than two groups 1 Factor ANOVA, Factorial ANOVA Both Within and Between Groups Factors Test statistic is an F-ratio Degrees of freedom Several to keep track of The number of them depends on the design XBXB XAXA XCXC
38
Analysis of Variance More than two groups Now we can’t just compute a simple difference score since there are more than one difference So we use variance instead of simply the difference Variance is essentially an average difference Observed variance Variance from chance F-ratio = XBXB XAXA XCXC
39
1 factor ANOVA 1 Factor, with more than two levels Now we can’t just compute a simple difference score since there are more than one difference A - B, B - C, & A - C XBXB XAXA XCXC
40
1 factor ANOVA Null hypothesis: H 0 : all the groups are equal X A = X B = X C Alternative hypotheses H A : not all the groups are equal X A ≠ X B ≠ X C X A ≠ X B = X C X A = X B ≠ X C X A = X C ≠ X B The ANOVA tests this one!! Do further tests to pick between these XBXB XAXA XCXC
41
1 factor ANOVA Planned contrasts and post-hoc tests: - Further tests used to rule out the different Alternative hypotheses X A ≠ X B ≠ X C X A ≠ X B = X C X A = X B ≠ X C X A = X C ≠ X B Test 1: A ≠ B Test 2: A ≠ C Test 3: B = C
42
Reporting your results The observed differences Kind of test Computed F-ratio Degrees of freedom for the test The “p-value” of the test Any post-hoc or planned comparison results “The mean score of Group A was 12, Group B was 25, and Group C was 27. A 1-way ANOVA was conducted and the results yielded a significant difference, F(2,25) = 5.67, p < 0.05. Post hoc tests revealed that the differences between groups A and B and A and C were statistically reliable (respectively t(1) = 5.67, p < 0.05 & t(1) = 6.02, p <0.05). Groups B and C did not differ significantly from one another” 1 factor ANOVA
43
Factorial ANOVAs We covered much of this in our experimental design lecture More than one factor Factors may be within or between Overall design may be entirely within, entirely between, or mixed Many F-ratios may be computed An F-ratio is computed to test the main effect of each factor An F-ratio is computed to test each of the potential interactions between the factors
44
Factorial ANOVAs Reporting your results The observed differences Because there may be a lot of these, may present them in a table instead of directly in the text Kind of design e.g. “2 x 2 completely between factorial design” Computed F-ratios May see separate paragraphs for each factor, and for interactions Degrees of freedom for the test Each F-ratio will have its own set of df’s The “p-value” of the test May want to just say “all tests were tested with an alpha level of 0.05” Any post-hoc or planned comparison results Typically only the theoretically interesting comparisons are presented
45
Distribution of sample means The following slides are available for a little more concrete review of distribution of sample means discussion.
46
Distribution of sample means Distribution of sample means is a “theoretical” distribution between the sample and population PopulationDistribution of sample meansSample Mean of a group of scores –Comparison distribution is distribution of means
47
Distribution of sample means A simple case Population: –All possible samples of size n = 2 2468 Assumption: sampling with replacement
48
Distribution of sample means A simple case Population: –All possible samples of size n = 2 2468 2 4 62 2 82 2 44 4 6 8 28 8 8 8 8464 6 6 6 6 4 6 8 242 mean 2 3 4 5 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 7 5 6 7 8 There are 16 of them
49
Distribution of sample means 2 4 6 8 2 4 6 8 2 46 2 6 2 6 46 4 6 8 28 8 8 8 4 4 4 6 8 2 2 mean 2 3 4 5 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 7 5 6 7 8 means 2345678 5 2 3 4 1 In long run, the random selection of tiles leads to a predictable pattern
50
Properties of the distribution of sample means Shape If population is Normal, then the dist of sample means will be Normal Population Distribution of sample means N > 30 –If the sample size is large (n > 30), regardless of shape of the population
51
Properties of the distribution of sample means The mean of the dist of sample means is equal to the mean of the population PopulationDistribution of sample means same numeric value different conceptual values Center
52
Properties of the distribution of sample means Center The mean of the dist of sample means is equal to the mean of the population Consider our earlier example 2468 Population μ = 2 + 4 + 6 + 8 4 = 5 Distribution of sample means means 2345678 5 2 3 4 1 2+3+4+5+3+4+5+6+4+5+6+7+5+6+7+8 16 = = 5
53
Properties of the distribution of sample means Spread Standard deviation of the population Sample size Putting them together we get the standard deviation of the distribution of sample means –Commonly called the standard error
54
Standard error The standard error is the average amount that you’d expect a sample (of size n) to deviate from the population mean In other words, it is an estimate of the error that you’d expect by chance (or by sampling)
55
All three of these properties are combined to form the Central Limit Theorem –For any population with mean μ and standard deviation σ, the distribution of sample means for sample size n will approach a normal distribution with a mean of and a standard deviation of as n approaches infinity (good approximation if n > 30). Central Limit Theorem
56
Distribution of sample means Keep your distributions straight by taking care with your notation Sample s X Population σ μ Distribution of sample means Back
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.